"United States Census, 1810," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XH2S-RXF : accessed 5 October 2020), James Baker, Burksville, Cumberland, Kentucky, United States; citing p. 166, NARA microfilm publication M252 (Washington D.C....
"United States Census, 1830," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XHPL-B6S : 12 August 2017), James Baker, North of Cumberland River, Cumberland, Kentucky, United States; citing 150, NARA microfilm publication M19, (Washington D...
Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:
Baker-23533 and Baker-13989 are not ready to be merged because: I know they're both married to the same woman and the death dates are somewhat similar, but the birthdates are WAY off, their parents are different people, and they don't share any children. I'm not confident these are the same person. Baker is a very very common name. More research needed.