Bolling Baker was the son of Andrew Baker Sr. (see DNA below).
Revolutionary War
Applied for his Revolutionary Pension, 22 Oct 1832 Clay Co., KY aged 69.[citation needed]
Bolling lived Wilkes Cty, NC at enlistment;[citation needed] his brother was George Baker of Morgan County, Indiana,formerly of Clay County, Kentucky.[citation needed]
George Baker testified in Morgan Co., Indiana that he knew his brother Boling Baker was drafted in the year 1780 and was in the Battle of Gates Defeat. He served a three-months term in 1781, stationed at Salibury under command of Gen. Green. signed: George (+) Baker. 17 Sep 1832.[citation needed]
R. P. Letcher stated he knew George Baker when he lived in Clay Co., Kentucky and that he was a man of truth.[citation needed]
Elisha Williamson Bowman, a clergyman, and William Morris, certified the deposition of Boling Baker. Abner Baker was clerk of the court. He is believed to be a different Baker family.[citation needed]
The descendants of Bolling Baker have matching Y-DNA with the descendants of his brothers John Renta Baker, Rev. Andrew Baker and Morris Baker.
None of the descendants show proof of Native American ancestry in their autosomal DNA.[citation needed]
Research Notes
Mother: Deed and survey records for his father, Andrew Baker, show that his wife was Susannah. Some unsourced trees suggest Andrew was married to Mary Bolling but no records found to support that.
"Kentucky, County Marriages, 1797-1954," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/V5ZC-2X3 : accessed 13 August 2016), Bolen Baker and Mary Rogers, 20 Mar 1798; citing Madison, Kentucky, United States, Madison County Courthouse, Richmond; FHL microfilm 183,304.
Is Bolling your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Bolling by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
I'm commenting here in my role as project coordinator of WikiTree's Native Americans project. My co-coordinator, Kathie Forbes, and I have been working on https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Baker-52864, which basically is a mythical person that has "attracted" some of the facts of this Bolling Baker. In the process of researching what is actually known and what is mythical, we learned of THIS Bolling Baker, and a very likely son. We've noted, with sources (some of which I think will help THIS profile) what we've found.
We are going to make Baker-52864 represent the mythical man, but wanted to be sure that the real Bollings were accurately represented and distinguished from the myth. You've got the father, but not the son. Any objections to us adding the son?
(And in case you're curious: the NA project allows the retention of "mythical" people because there are descendants out there who believe they are real; if we merge them away or otherwise delete them, someone will come along and recreate them.)
Baker-17325 and Baker-1653 appear to represent the same person because: Intended to repResent same North Carolinian. Higher numbered profile is completely unsourced. Use and retain data in lower numbered profile. Thank you.
I'm commenting here in my role as project coordinator of WikiTree's Native Americans project. My co-coordinator, Kathie Forbes, and I have been working on https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Baker-52864, which basically is a mythical person that has "attracted" some of the facts of this Bolling Baker. In the process of researching what is actually known and what is mythical, we learned of THIS Bolling Baker, and a very likely son. We've noted, with sources (some of which I think will help THIS profile) what we've found.
We are going to make Baker-52864 represent the mythical man, but wanted to be sure that the real Bollings were accurately represented and distinguished from the myth. You've got the father, but not the son. Any objections to us adding the son?
(And in case you're curious: the NA project allows the retention of "mythical" people because there are descendants out there who believe they are real; if we merge them away or otherwise delete them, someone will come along and recreate them.)