no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Baker (abt. 1616 - abt. 1669)

William Baker
Born about in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1633 in Colchester, Essex, Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 53 in Rhode Islandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Puritan Great Migration Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 19 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 1,838 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
William Baker migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Biography

He was born about 1616 and his parents were Mary Frances (Ingram) and Nicholas Thomas Baker.

William BAKER married about 1633 in Colchester, Essex, England to Mary EVERSHAM and their children included ...

  1. Thomas BAKER, b: 1638 in Dedham, Essex, England; d: 1710; m: Sarah CARR
  2. Mary BAKER, b: c1640, m: Mark ROBERTS
  3. Sarah BAKER, b: c1642, m: Peter ROBERTSON

In 1635 Roger Williams went to Aquidneck Island which is the old name for Rhode Island on which Newport, RI is now situated.

In 1638 "he and others were admitted to be inhabitants of Aquidnect Island, having submitted themselves to the government that is or shall be established".

On 23 August 1638 "he had a lot granted him and was to build on it the following spring at farthest, or else his lot was to be disposed of".

On 13 July 1654 he "was one of the witnesses to the deed from Cheif Toccamanen to the Warwick purchases of a tract called "Potawomut".

On 01 April 1669 he and his wife Mary gave a receipt to Abiah Carpenter for a yearling heffer.

Research Note

Anderson in "Great Migration Begins" says there were 5 men who migrated to New England by the name of William Baker. [1]

  1. William Baker in Plymouth by 1632, hiding with Pequots in 1637,38. 1 child among the Indians.
  2. William Baker of Charlestown in 1633, then Billerica. Wife name Joan.
  3. William Baker of Watertown 1636 - 1638 then Plymouth. no names for wife & children.
  4. William Baker of Portsmouth 1638. Wife Mary.
  5. William Baker of Boston after 1651. Wife Mary Eddington, wife Pilgrim Eddy.

This profile most closely matches the William Baker of Portsmouth who Anderson says was listed as a freeman in 1638. Anderson, however, does not give surname of wife or parents; and does not list children. Great Migration Directory entry: Baker, William: Unknown; 1638; Portsmouth [RICR 1:59, 91, 92; GMB 79; Austin 10].

Sources

  1. Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2010), (Originally Published as: New England Historic Genealogical Society. Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England 1620-1633, Volumes I-III, 3 vols., 1995). Pages 79-80link for subscribers
  • International Genealogical Index at Family History Library for William BAKER b: c1616, m: 1633 Colchester, Essex, England to Mary EVERSHAM






Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with William by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I am confused on the timeline. These are direct ancestors of mine. Here it has William Baker b.1616 in America before his child Rev. Thomas Baker b. 1638 was born in England. I also have Thomas not immigrating until 1653. Any info that anyone has that can help me connect these two would be greatly appreciated.
posted by Hollie Baker
He was not born in America in 1616. He was born in England.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Sorry I guess I was not clear... William Baker that was born in 1616 in England was placed in America prior to the supposed birth of his son Rev. Thomas Baker that was born in England abt 1638. How would that be possible.
posted by Hollie Baker
edited by Hollie Baker
Hollie, This profile needs some additional research, but just quickly glancing at Austins RI genealogical dictionary, I'm not sure that Thomas b 1638 should be attached as a son. Austin only lists the two daughters as possible descendants of William. There is a separate entry for Thomas, on the same page, so I assume that Austin found no evidence that they were related.
posted by M Cole
Baker-8986 and Baker-505 appear to represent the same person because: same person
posted by [Living McQueen]