John Barker Sr.
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Barker Sr. (1610 - 1652)

John Barker Sr.
Born in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 1632 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died in Marshfield, Plymouth Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Sep 2009 | Last significant change: 23 Jul 2021
14:20: Jeanie (Thornton) Roberts edited the data for John Barker Sr. (1610-1652). (Merged Barker-14636 into Barker-10: Clear duplicate.) [Thank Jeanie for this | 2 thank-yous received]
This page has been accessed 6,582 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
John Barker Sr. migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1620-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Disputed Origin

According to The Great Migration Directory: Immigrants to New England, 1620–1640 the parents and origins of this person are not known.[1]

See Records of the colony of New Plymouth, in New England', Nathaniel B. Shurtleff and David Pulsifer, eds., 12 volumes in 10 (Boston 1855-1861) 1:101, 3:28-37; Note-Book Kept by Thomas Lechford, Esq., Lawyer, in Boston, Massachusetts Bay, from June 27, 1638, to July 29, 1641, Edward Everett Hale, Jr., ed. (Cambridge 1885; rpt. Camden, Maine, 1988) 194; Mayflower Descendants 11:156-57, 17:109, 111; NEHGR 53:426-7[2];

Earlier treatments of John Barker stated his was son of Sir Robert Baker and Catherine Ackworth, giving him descendancy from Magna Carta Surety barons Saher de Quincy and Richard de Clare..[3] However, no evidence has been found to support this.

Apparently, though, there is DNA evidence to suggest some sort of relationship. See below.

We do know he was brother of Robert Barker who came to Plymouth in 1632.[4]

Biography

He married Anne Williams between 1632 & 1638 in Scituate, Massachusetts.

He died in the town of Jones in Plymouth Colony.

He was memorialized on a ceneotaph of First Settlers of Marshfield at Old Winslow Cemetery.

Spouse:

Anna Williams Barker (____ - 1657)

Children:

Deborah Barker Barden (1639 - 1721)

He drowned at his ferry over the Jones River.

He arrived with his brother Robert to the Plymouth colony in about 1628-30. According to Barker, he and his brother "set out from Plymouth colony to make homes for themselves, going by boat along the coast until they came to the North River (near Cape Cod) sailing down this, they reached what is now part of Pembroke, Mass. known as Herringbrook.

Here they camped for the winter and the following spring ground was broken and the house built.

John lived in that part of Plymouth which was set off in 1637 as Duxbury. He was a brickmason and agreed to teach Wm. Barden the trade of a bricklayer, as the end of his time giving him (Wm) ‘20 bushels of corn, 2 suits of apparel and an ewe goat's lamb.'

In 1628 he moved to Marshfield, Mass. and bought a ferry at the Jones River, where he covenanted to keep it ‘at two pence a person until a bridge is built.' In 1643 he was a member of the Marshfield Military Co. under Lt. Nathaniel Thomas; in 1648, he had some disagreement with a neighbor about a buildary line. The court requested John Alden and Miles Standish to ‘set at rights such differences as are betwixt them'" (231).

According to Deane, "He was drowned, 1652. [He had purchased the ferry (now [1850] Little's Bridge] of John Brewster, son of Elder Brewster, 1641, and was there drowned]." [1, 3]

DNA Evidence

Male paternal-line descendants of John Barker and his alleged father, Sir Robert Barker, are reported to share the same Y-DNA haplogroup.[5]

Research Notes

There is a John Barker (UK) created that shows his parents as Catherine (Acworth) Barker and Robert Barker. It is possible that John Barker (US) and John Barker (UK) are the same person but the relationship is not proven. This note has been added to acknowledge the uncertainty and to prevent further confusion. If it turns out in the future that these two can be merged, sobeit!

Sources

  1. Robert Charles Anderson, The Great Migration Directory: Immigrants to New England, 1620–1640 (Boston, Massachusetts. New England Historic and Genealogical Society. 2015)
  2. NEHGR 53:426-7
  3. Elizabeth Frye Barker, Barker Genealogy (New York 1927) 231
  4. Please see Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to N.E. 1620-1633, Vols. I-III p 92-97
  5. Barker DNA [1]

See also:



More Genealogy Tools



Sponsored Search




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Sponsored by Ancestry ®

Family History Search.

Simplified.

Enter a grandparent's name. Just one grandparent can lead you to many discoveries.

Comments: 7

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hi All,

Please can you check out new data on Catherine Acworth (Acworth-322) and Robert Barker (Barker-11). Catherine married Robert Barker - not Robert Baker. Catherine's origins are now fairly well established. Maybe we can sort out this long standing poblem. It seems that Catherine and Robert had had nine children viz: John, Robert, William, Thomas, George, Mathew, Marye, Bridgett and Johanne.

posted by Ian Acworth
Robert barker and Catherine Ackworth had sons Robert and John, but there is no reason to think they are the same as the immigrants. So, this identification is not accepted. Is there any new data?
posted by Joe Cochoit
I would say that there is no reason to Not think they are related to the immigrants either. Surely this is a strong possibility, if not actually proven.

What data would be considered acceptible to prove the relationship? They probably lost their boarding passes! Seriously though, how do we make the link back through 400 years? Or is this simply not possible?

You ask about new data - the detailed biography of Catherine's father George is new to this discussion. So a better appreciation of the Shropshire Visitation entry of 1623 is now possible.

I would agree that the early versions that suggested Catherine was some sort of Lady with Royal origins is patently untrue. I have seen a "Lady Catherine Acworth of Southwell Kent" in some profiles. Southwell is not in Kent and Catherine was not a Lady. But it seems that Catherine may have been born in Kent and her father was a prebendary at Southwell Minster in Nottinghamshire for a small period. Out of such scraps - mythologies grow!

posted by Ian Acworth
I don't know a lot about DNA either but. They didn't do a DNA test on Sir Robert Barker. So what I see is a person who tested his DNA, and then submitted his faulty pedigree. I think, once again we should disconnect. His brother Robert is disconnected. Even the Geni profile notes that they have disconnected from the alleged parents.
posted by Anne B
But there is now a claim of dna connection. The link provided though is iffy. And I don’t know enough about dna to judge.
posted by Jillaine Smith
No objection to detaching parents since Bio text shows reasoning.
posted by Sandy Culver
Objections to disconnecting these unproven parents?
posted by Anne B

Rejected matches › John Parker (1609-)

B  >  Barker  >  John Barker Sr.

Categories: Puritan Great Migration