no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah Bartlett (1761)

Sarah Bartlett
Born in Kingston, Rockingham, New Hampshiremap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 4 Dec 2015
This page has been accessed 148 times.

Biography

This profile is part of the Bartlett Name Study.

Nathan Bartlett and Joanna Flanders were m. at Kingston March 15, 1741.
Joanna, b. Kingston, Jan. 4, 1742.
John, b. Kingston, July 31, 1743.
Mary, b. Kingston, Sept. 5, 1745.
John, b. Kingston, Dec. 31, 1747.
Ebenezer,b. Kingston, April 23, 1750.
Nathan, b. Kingston, Feb. 25, 1752; m. Mary Blaisdell.
Zipporah,b. Kingston, March 6, 1754.
Jeremiah, b. Kingston, Dec. 6, 1757.
Sarah, b. Kingston, April 19, 1761[1]


Sources

  1. Page 18, Eastman, John R. (John Robie),History of the town of Andover, New Hampshire : 1751-1906. Volume pt. 2. Publisher Concord, N.H. : Printed by the Rumford Print. Co. Published 1910. Pages 474. https://archive.org/details/historyoftownofa02east




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.

B  >  Bartlett  >  Sarah Bartlett

Categories: Bartlett Name Study