↑ Alvan Talcott, Families of Early Guilford, CD-Local and Family Histories: CT, 1600's - 1800's,, Produced in collaboration with the Genealogical Publishing Company, 2000, vol 2, p 1248.
↑ Donald Lines Jacobus, Families of Ancient New Haven ([CD]Baltimore, Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 1981[originally]Rome, N.Y. and New Haven, Conn., 1922-1932), vol 1, p 150.
↑ Rev. Hollis A. Campbell, William C. Sharpe and Frank G. Bassett, Seymour Past and Present (Seymour, Connecticut, W. C. Sharpe, 1902), p. 447.
↑ Donald Lines Jacobus, History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield, CD-Local and Family Histories: CT, 1600's - 1800's, (Produced in collaboration with the Genealogical Publishing Company, 2000), vol 1, p 41; vol 1, p 196.
↑ Donald Lines Jacobus, Families of Ancient New Haven, vol 1, p 150.
↑ Alvan Talcott, Families of Early Guilford, vol 2, p 1248.
Orcutt, Samuel, Rev. (1886) A History of the Old Town of Stratford and the City of Bridgeport, Connecticut, Part II Genealogies. Published by the Fairfield County Historical Society. vol. 2, pages 1123, 1198
The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records (NEHGS, Boston, 2011) Vol. Stratford, Page 30. Marriage record.
Is Hannah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hannah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hannah:
Black-245 and Beach-356 appear to represent the same person because: Going to try this again. The person MHNV-P5M identified in the bio, has been deleted at Family Search. Hannah Black Fairchild has been identified by the unreliable IGI as the wife of Zachariah Fairchild, who actually had a wife Hannah Beach. Obviously an error was made and this profile should be Hannah Beach.
Well, I'm not sure what's "clear" about it given the lack of information here, and I'm merely working on cleanup, but if this is rejected as a match, then this profile should just be deleted.
Beach-356 and Black-245 appear to represent the same person because: A search for Hannah Black online marrying a Fairchild returns only references to Hannah Beach/Black m. Zachariah Fairchild, who died 1726 in Stratford, and was born before 1680 -- which fits the dates on the Hannah Black profile, reversed. Even if not true, there is no other information on the Black profile and it hasn't been substantively edited in years.
could she have been born in 1665? I see a marriage in 1681 in Stratford, Fairfield, Connecticut between Zechariah Fairchild (1651-1703) & Hannah BEACH (1665-)?