no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Davis Bennehan (abt. 1782 - aft. 1847)

Davis Bennehan [uncertain]
Born about in Wake, North Carolina, United Statesmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died after after about age 65 [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Michelle Detwiler private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 Feb 2022
This page has been accessed 32 times.
This enslaved ancestor's profile has a preliminary Last Name At Birth (LNAB) until a surname can be determined. Please see the US Black Heritage Naming Conventions for Slaves before merging or changing the LNAB.

Biography

US Black Heritage Project
Davis Bennehan is a part of US Black heritage.

Davis lived in Wake Co, NC on the Fish Dam Plantation. He was a slave owned by Thomas D. Bennehan. Davis was listed in Thomas Bennehan's probate papers in 1847.[1]

Slave Owners

See Fish Dam Plantation for more information.

Sources

  1. Cameron Family Papers https://finding-aids.lib.unc.edu/00133/#d1e5584 Southern Historical Collection, Louis Round Wilson Special Collections Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
    • Subseries 2.6. Estate Papers, 1804-1942 Folder 2154 image 26




Is Davis your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Davis's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Bennehan-111 and Bennehan-8 do not represent the same person because: These persons were enslaved, their last names are unknown, their ages are unknown, but their first name is the same. These are different persons. Please do not merge!
Bennehan-229 and Bennehan-8 do not represent the same person because: These persons were enslaved, their last names are unknown, their ages are unknown, but their first name is the same. These are different persons. Please do not merge!
Bennehan-230 and Bennehan-8 do not represent the same person because: These persons were enslaved, their last names are unknown, their ages are unknown, but their first name is the same. These are different persons. Please do not merge!
Bennehan-399 and Bennehan-8 do not represent the same person because: These persons were enslaved, their last names are unknown, their ages are unknown, but their first name is the same. These are different persons. Please do not merge!
Bennehan-410 and Bennehan-8 do not represent the same person because: These persons were enslaved, their last names are unknown, their ages are unknown, but their first name is the same. These are different persons. Please do not merge!