no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Eva Bennet (bef. 1733)

Eva Bennet
Born before in New Utrecht, Kings County, Long Island, Province of New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: New Netherland Settlers WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 25 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 292 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Eva Bennet was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Name

Eva /BENNET/[1]

Birth

1733[2]

Church records

  • 1733 Jul 29 Eva; parents: William Bennett, Sara s.v. Wit.: Wynant Bennet, Eva Bennet. [3]

Sources

  1. Source: #S32 Page: Database online. Data: Text: Record for Jan Bennet
  2. Source: #S32 Page: Database online. Data: Text: Record for Jan Bennet
  3. "Records of the Reformed Church of New Utrecht, Long Island", New York Genealogical and Biographical Record Vol.112-113 (1981-1982). via Chris Chester, "The Brouwer Genealogy Database".
  • Source: S32 Author: Ancestry.com Title: Public Member Trees Publication: Name: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006; Repository: #R2

Acknowledgements

  • WikiTree profile Bennet-283 created through the import of Johnson Family Tree 2011-08-24.ged on Aug 24, 2011 by Rosemary Palermo. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Rosemary and others.






Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Eva's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Eva seems to be a later child of Jan and Eyda, who is also not in your list. But Eyda was certainly still young enough by this 1733 date. So I am going to move Eva over to the father who is husband of Eyda, Jan Janse Bennet. No patronymic here to prove it, so it needs study.
posted by Steven Mix