Hugh (Bigod) le Bigod

Hugh (Bigod) le Bigod (abt. 1185 - 1225)

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Sir Hugh "5th Earl of Norfolk" le Bigod formerly Bigod
Born about in Suffolk, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married about (to about ) [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died in Thetford, Norfolk, Englandmap
Profile last modified | Created 14 Apr 2010 | Last significant change: 8 Apr 2019
02:22: Liz (Noland) Shifflett edited the Biography for Hugh (Bigod) le Bigod (abt.1185-1225). (changed project box to sticker) [Thank Liz for this]
This page has been accessed 17,297 times.
Magna Carta Surety Baron
Hugh le Bigod was one of the twenty-five medieval barons who were surety for Magna Carta in 1215.
Join: Magna Carta Project
Discuss: magna_carta



Hugh (Bigod) le Bigod was a member of aristocracy in England.

Name andTitles

Hugh le Bigod, 5th Earl of Norfolk
Hereditary Steward of the Household.
Hereditary Warden of Romford Forest.
Surety to the Magna Carta signed by King John in 1215.
Son and heir. [1]

Birth and Parentage

"Hugh Bigod, 5th Earl of Norfolk[2] the eldest son, was born before 1195. He was the hereditary steward of the king's household, and hereditary bearer of the Barons of St. Edmund. Not many particulars of this Baron's life have been preserved, as he enjoyed for only a few years the title of Earl of Norfolk and Suffolk, and his father's estates and honors, to which he had succeeded in the 5th year of King Henry III. [3]

Marriage and Children

He married probably before Lent 1207 Maud Marshal. [1]
He married Maud Marshal, eldest daughter of William Marshal, 3rd Earl of Pembroke, and his wife, Isabel Clare, daughter of Richard de Clare, the Strongbow, 2nd Earl of Pembroke, and his wife, Eva, daughter of Dermot MacMurcha, King of Leinster, Ireland. She was also the sister of the Surety William Marshal & she married (2) William, Earl of Warren/Warrenne and Surrey" [4]
Children Hugh le Bigod and Maud Marshall:
  1. Roger, Knt, 6th Earl of Norfolk
  2. Hugh, III, Knt
  3. Ralph, Knt
  4. William (possibly)
  5. Isabel married Fitzgeoffrey
Some sources show an additional son Simon. Richardson [5] has termed such a connection "quite doubtful" and that a descent of Simon from a different branch of the Bigod family is more likely.
No documentation has been found regarding John, another purported son.


Died: Between 11 February and 18 February 1224/5. [1]


Magna Carta
In 1215, he and his father joined the confederacy of the barons against the king.[1]


Footnotes and citations:
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Richardson. Royal Ancestry. (2013): vol. 1 p. 363-364.
  2. Royal Ancestry, Vol I, page 364 - Hugh was the 5th Earl of Norfolk, (not the 3rd)
  4. McBride2 citing Burke's p53, cited by Rootsweb.
  5. "Modern Bigod family sources...such as C. P. 10 (1945) 590, Paget, Baronage of England (1957) 65:1, and Morris, Bigod Earls of Norfolk in the 13th Century (2005) do not include a son, Simon, in the family of Earl Hugh le Bigod, earl of Norfolk. As such, the alleged connection to Earl Hugh le Bigod seems quite doubtful. Anstis has suggested, alternatively, that the Felbrigg family of Norfolk was probably descended from a cadet banch of Ralph le Bigod, the Domesday tenant [see Anstis, Reg of the Order of the Garter, 2 (1724): 169, which descent may well be more likely. Whatever the case, the matter deserves further study." Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry (2013), Volume II, pp. 552-553, footnote.
Source list:
  • Richardson, Douglas. Royal Ancestry: A Study In Colonial And Medieval Families, in 5 vols. (Salt Lake City, Utah, 2013): vol. 1 p. 363-364.
  • Richardson, Douglas. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study In Colonial And Medieval Families, exp. 2nd ed. in 4 vols, (Salt Lake City, Utah, 2011): vol. I p. 200-202, 421.
  • Medieval Lands, database online, author Charles Cawley, (Foundation for Medieval Genealogy, 2006-2013), England, Earls of Norfolk, Link


This page has been edited according to Style Standards adopted by January 2014. Click the Changes tab to see edits to this profile; from that list, click WikiTree IDs other than Bigod-1 to see changes to those profiles prior to being merged.

Thank you to everyone who contributed to this profile.

Magna Carta Project

As a surety baron, Sir Hugh le Bigod's profile is managed by the Magna Carta Project. See Bigod-1 Descendants for profiles of his descendants that have been improved and categorized by the Magna Carta project and are in a project-approved trail to a Gateway Ancestor. See this index for links to other surety barons and category pages for their descendants. See the project's Base Camp for more information about Magna Carta trails.

More Genealogy Tools

Sponsored Search

Sponsored Search by

No known carriers of Hugh's Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA have taken yDNA or mtDNA tests.

Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Images: 2
Magna Carta template
Magna Carta template

Hugh le Bigod coat of arms
Hugh le Bigod coat of arms


On 14 Apr 2018 at 17:37 GMT Joe Cochoit wrote:

Tim, methods of counting can vary which leads to confusion. This is especially difficult in very early creations of a title. You can say he was the 3rd earl of the 3rd creation of the title, or that he was the 5th earl of Norfolk overall. In this case actually, it is clear the the old title was settled on his grandfather (3rd earl) by Henry II so it was not a true new creation as we think of it in modern terms. As a way of standardizing such things, we follow Complete Peerage as the definitive source which makes this Hugh Bigod the 5th earl.

On 14 Apr 2018 at 15:55 GMT Tim (Moore) Schaeffer wrote:

A quick internet search shows Hugh Bigod born abt 1186, is the 3rd Earl of Norfolk

On 27 Jan 2018 at 23:25 GMT April (Dellinger) Dauenhauer wrote:

Good catch, Liz. The "III" should be removed from this Hugh le Bigod.

Looking in Royal Ancestry, Vol I, under Bigod starting on page 362, I can't even find any Hugh the third - (this Hugh's father is Roger). This Hugh le Bigod had a son Hugh BUT that son did not have a son Hugh (who would have been Hugh III, but no such person).

Thanks Liz!

On 27 Jan 2018 at 06:45 GMT Liz (Noland) Shifflett wrote:

Nothing in the text indicates he was "Hugh III" in his lifetime, so it seems odd that it's in the preferred name field. OK to delete "III" from that field?

On 6 Jan 2018 at 05:27 GMT Andrea (Stawski) Pack wrote:

Trail Hugh III Bogod-1 is the 16th great grandfather of George Yate-17
1. George is the son of John Yate [confident]
2. John is the son of Thomas Yate [unknown confidence]
3. Thomas is the son of Jane (Tichborne) Yate [unknown confidence]
4. Jane is the daughter of Nicholas Tichborne Esq [unknown confidence]
5. Nicholas is the son of Ann (White) Tichborne [unknown confidence]
6. Ann is the daughter of Robert White [unknown confidence]
7. Robert is the son of Eleanor (Hungerford) Garth [confident]
8. Eleanor is the daughter of Robert Hungerford [confident]
9. Robert is the son of Walter Hungerford KG [confident]
10. Walter is the son of Joan (Hussey) Hungerford [confident]
11. Joan is the daughter of Edmund Hussey [confident]
12. Edmund is the son of Reginald Hussey [unknown confidence]
13. Reginald is the son of Reginald Hussey [unknown confidence]
14. Reginald is the son of Unknown (Verdun) Hussey [unknown confidence]
15. Unknown is the daughter of Theobald (Verdun) de Verdun [unknown confidence]
16. Theobald is the son of Margery (Lacy) de Verdun [unknown confidence]
17. Margery is the daughter of Isabel (Bigod) FitzGeoffrey [unknown confidence]
18. Isabel is the daughter of Hugh (Bigod) le Bigod [confident]

On 1 Mar 2017 at 07:09 GMT April (Dellinger) Dauenhauer wrote:

The Comment by Chase Ashley regarding the use of "Sir" motivated me to look up Hugh le Bigod's biography in Richardson's Royal Ancestry, Vol I, page 364. Hugh le Bigod is written by Douglas Richardson without the honorific of SIR, as:

"Hugh le Bigod, 5th Earl of Norfolk, died between 11th Feb. and 18 Feb. 1224/5."

Regardless that there may be more to it than can be covered here, and this era produces conflicting opinions among experts, it is my opinion WikiTree should continue to use "SIR" unless a question in G2G produces changes in the guidelines.

Hugh's son also named Hugh is written by Richardson with the honorific "SIR". A survey of other lords shows some with, others without.

On 28 Feb 2017 at 23:48 GMT Chase Ashley wrote:

Unless an original record can be produced that shows he was called "Sir", it should be deleted as a prefix since "Sir" supposedly wasn't used as an honorific in England until 1297 and, in any event, was for lesser mortal like knights and baronets.

On 3 Jun 2016 at 09:05 GMT J (Schmeeckle) S wrote:

Deborah, Martha (Yonge) Moore is not a gateway ancestor. The problem is with her father's false father. George Young-3414, b. 1517 in Shropshire, was NOT the father of Christopher Yonges-9, b. 1575(!) in faraway Suffolk. That link should be detached.

On 2 Jun 2016 at 18:40 GMT Deborah (Hoffman) Weiner wrote:

In reference to the previous message:

Martha (Yonge) Moore's ID # is Yonges-8, not Yonge-8. The relationship link to Hugh Bigod is through Hugh's daughter Isabel. Thank you.

On 2 Jun 2016 at 18:30 GMT Deborah (Hoffman) Weiner wrote:

My gateway ancestor is not listed on Hugh's information. I am a 23rd G granddaughter and would want to pursue this further. I have a gateway ancestor Martha (Yonge) Moore, ID # YONGE-8 as a possible candidate. What is the next step? Thank you

more comments

Hugh is 25 degrees from Amy Gilpin, 21 degrees from Joshua Slocum and 11 degrees from Henry VIII of England on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.

B  >  Bigod  |  L  >  le Bigod  >  Hugh (Bigod) le Bigod

Categories: House of Bigod | Earls of Norfolk | Magna Carta | Surety Barons | Bigod-2 Descendants