NOTICE: This profile is protected by the Acadian Project because of relationship confusion and attempts to add unsourced parents. Please contact the Acadian Project before making any substantive changes. Thanks for helping make WikiTree the best site for accurate information.
Guillaume Blanchard was born about 1650 in Port-Royal, Acadie, Nouvelle-France, son of Jean Blanchard (abt. 1611–abt. 1686) and Radegonde Lambert (abt. 1621–aft. 1686).[1]
Guillaume and Huguette lived with his parents in 1678.[3]
In 1686, at Port Royal, Guillaume BLANCHARD, aged 35, was living with his wife, Huguette GOUJONNE [sic], aged 27, and their five children: Marie, aged 12, Rene, aged 8, Antoine, aged 6 1/2, Jeanne, aged 5, and Anne, aged 2. They owned 4 guns and were living on 5 arpents of cultivable land with 16 cattle and 20 sheep.[4]
By 1693, his parents had died and Guillaume and Huguette had quite a large property of 30 arpents, 30 cattle and 40 sheep. They also had 8 of their unmarried children, and their daughter Marie and her husband and child living with them.[5]
In 1695, he signed the Loyalty Oath with his mark, indicating he did not know how to write. [6]
By 1698, their last baby was just 6 months old, and they were still living in Port Royal. Their daughter Marie and her husband had moved out. They had acquired a little more property.[7]
With Pierre Thibodeau he started "Village des Blanchard," which became Shipodie (Chipoudy) currently Hillsborough NB in 1698-99. He established two of his sons and a daughter with her husband at Petitcodiac. But there was controversy, and in the end, the Blanchards had possession, but Michel Leneuf de la Valliere (the elder) was granted seigneurial rights, a disappointment to the Blanchards.[8]
Aug 1695: Guillaume Blanchard took the oath of allegiance to the King of England at Port-Royal; he made his mark on the document.
1 Nov 1699: Extract from a letter from Mathieu de Goutin concerning the founding of Chipoudy: "Guillaume Blanchard and other settlers from Port-Royal came here two days ago to take up grants ..."
27 Dec 1699: Chartering of a ship by Guillaume Blanchard to his associates Jean Labat and Christophe Cahouet, at a rate of thirty livres per month.
2 Oct 1702: Extract from a report by Mathieu de Goutin concerning the founding of Les Mines, requesting that Guillaume Blanchard be granted a half league on either side of the Petitcoudiac River: "the said Blanchard has a sailing vessel, and grown sons, sons-in-law and nephews, who will put the Pecoudiak the land along the Petitcoudiac River to use and will settle there many people, and in three years the colony will draw support from them ..."
1707 Port-Royal: Guillaume BLANCHARD and his wife, 2 boys 14 or older. 2 younger boys. 2 girls 12 or older; 25 arpents, 32 cattle, 38 sheep, 14 hogs, 6 guns. [12]
1714 Port-Royal: Guillaume BLANCHARD and wife, 2 sons. [13]
Guillaume died about 1716 in Port-Royal, Acadie,[8]
Sources
↑ 1.01.11.21.3 Stephen A. White, Dictionnaire généalogique des familles acadiennes. (Moncton, N.-B.: Centre d'études acadiennes, Université de Moncton, 1999), Print. p.143 & 146
Jean BLANCHARD, 60, wife, Radegonde LAMBERT 42; Children (married): Martin 24, Madeline 28, Anne 26; (unmarried): Guillaume 21, Bernard 18, Marie 15; cattle 12, sheep 9.
↑ 3.03.1 Tim Hebert; 1678 Port Royal Acadian Census noting that the correlations for this census were done by Rev. Clarence J. d'Entremont, Fairhaven, Massachusetts.1678 Census
at Port Royal: Guillaume BLANCHARD 35, Huguette GOUJONNE 27; children: Rene 8, Antoine 6 1/2, Marie 12, Jeanne 5, Anne 2; 4 guns, 5 arpents, 16 cattle, 20 sheep. In the 1686 census at Port Royal, Gougeon was listed as Goujonne.
Guillaume BLANCHARD 48; Huguette GOUJON (wife) 47; Rene 22; Antoine 19, Jeanne 17; Anne 15; Jean 13; Elisabeth 11; Guillaume 9; Madeleine 6; Pierre 3; Charles 1/2; 26 cattle, 24 sheep, 12 hogs, 34 arpents, 12 fruit trees, 3 guns.
↑ 8.08.1 Maud Hody, “BLANCHARD, GUILLAUME,” in Dictionary of Canadian Biography, vol. 2, University of Toronto/Université Laval, 2003–, accessed August 10, 2020, Guillaume Blanchard
at Port-Royal: Guillaume BLANCHARD and his wife, 2 boys 14 or older. 2 younger boys. 2 girls 12 or older; 25 arpents, 32 cattle, 38 sheep, 14 hogs, 6 guns.
at Port-Royal: Guillaume BLANCHARD and wife, 2 sons.
See Also:
Stephen A. White, English Supplement to the Dictionnaire Généalogique des Familles Acadiennes, Moncton NB: Centre d'Etudes Acadiennes, Universite de Moncton, 1999, p. 33.
Web: International, Find A Grave Index Record Millennium File U.S. and Canada, Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 GODBOUT, PERE ARCHANGE. "Le role du Saint-Jehan et les origines acadiennes." In Memoires de la Societe Genealogique Canadienne-Francaise, vol. 1 (1944), pp. 19-30.
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Guillaume by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA test-takers in his direct paternal line.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Blanchard-173 and Richard-386 appear to represent the same person because: Guillaume Richard is a non-existent person. He married Huguette but we believe he really matches with Guillaume Blanchard. as she didn't have two husbands. The Acadian project leaders are in agreement on this merge despite some factual differences. Use everything from the Blanchard profile, nothing from the Richard profile.
I am currently doing research for a friend of mine who is related through a great-grandfater to Guillaume Richard. While researching I felt there was someone else who matched this same information and found Guilllaume Blanchard in a search.
I would be glad to reach out to her and try to explain this complicated situation.
Blanchard-4691 and Blanchard-173 appear to represent the same person because: Although the dates are wildly different, the names and connections are similar. The unconnected and orphaned Blanchard-4691 may be safely merged into Blanchard-173. Please keep the info from Blanchard-173 and read Bea's note posted on Blanchard-173. Thanks!
Blanchard-4688 and Blanchard-173 appear to represent the same person because: Although the dates are wildly different, the names and connections are similar. The unconnected and orphaned Blanchard-4688 may be safely merged into Blanchard-173. Please keep the info from Blanchard-173 and read Bea's note posted on Blanchard-173. Thanks!
Blanchard-2396 and Blanchard-173 appear to represent the same person because: Prior request by Bea Timmerman to merge rejected - this is the same person - check previous comment for notes on changes made
Richard-1346 and Richard-386 appear to represent the same person because: they cite the same life event data and are connected to the same (duplicate) spouses who also need to be merged:
Blanchard-1721 and Blanchard-173 appear to represent the same person because:
Hi ,
These are the same and can be merged , added some (research note ) and info , sources to the duplicates, also connected the duplicate to the parents already . Thanks :)
I would be glad to reach out to her and try to explain this complicated situation.
Perhaps DNA could be done.
Keep in contact if you have further insterest.
http://www.francogene.com/index.php Famille 44152
Blanchard-4688, Blanchard-4691 and Blanchard-173 are in fact duplicates, but set as unmerged matches now, see also this G2G where things are explained a bit more.
Greets from the Netherlands,
Bea :)
Blanchard-173 and Blanchard-4691 are in fact duplicates, but set as unmerged matches now, see also this G2G where things are explained a bit more.
Greets from the Netherlands,
Bea :)
Blanchard-4688, Blanchard-4691 and Blanchard-173 are in fact duplicates, but set as unmerged matches now, see also this G2G where things are explained a bit more.
Greets from the Netherlands,
Bea :)
Huguette Foirier-2 Huguette Foirier-1
Hi ,
These are the same and can be merged , added some (research note ) and info , sources to the duplicates, also connected the duplicate to the parents already . Thanks :)