no image

George (Boon) Boone I (1625 - 1676)

Privacy Level: Open (White)
George Boone I formerly Boon
Born in Exeter, Devon, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
[children unknown]
Died in Exeter, Devon, Englandmap
Boon-22 created 1 Nov 2010 | Last modified
This page has been accessed 3,304 times.

Categories: Boone Name Study.

The Boone Society and other “expert” researchers agree that any ancestors of George Boon(e) I is pure conjecture. Anyone finding definitive resources to prove any of the parentage should post that information in G2G.
12:49, 16 June 2014 (EDT)Lee-5956

1st Generation

“GEORGE BOONE I. (that is the first that we have heard of) was born in England.” The Boone Society, working with the Devon Record Office and other hired British genealogists, have not been able to find a birth, marriage or death record for this George Boone of England. Important: No source has ever been found for the name of Ann Fallace or her alleged connection to George Boone 1st or any George Boone. The Boone Society will refrain from using this name until it can be proven, and we suggest you do the same


I Robin Lee have removed all the sources except for the one above, as all of the trees referenced and all of the sites referenced were circular. As stated on the Boone Society Website, no definitive proof of the parents of George Boone II have been found.


Thanks to all that have contributed to this profile.

More: Family Tree & Genealogy Tools

Sponsored by MyHeritage

Searching for someone else?
First: Last:

Do you have a GEDCOM? Login to have every name in your tree searched. It's free (like everything on WikiTree).

Sponsored by MyHeritage

No known carriers of George's ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA have taken yDNA or mtDNA tests.

Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Family Tree DNA.


On 3 Apr 2016 at 17:11 GMT Robin Lee wrote:

I would like to reduce the number of profile managers on this profile, you can stay on the trusted list, but, right now this profile is a subject of a lot of discussion and not a lot of participants.

On 2 Apr 2016 at 15:18 GMT Robin Lee wrote:

Note sent to Patricia Weaver asking for the sources she has for the parents as the Boone Society indicates that the parents are UNPROVEN

On 27 Jun 2015 at 21:41 GMT Dave Patrick wrote:

Boon-22 and Boon-836 appear to represent the same person because: The dates have been corrected. I looked at what I had down there and realized it didn't match with the other dates I had in my tree. I would like to merge these individuals and help clean up the Boon/Boone tree with real data. Thanks.

On 23 Jun 2015 at 01:11 GMT Herbert Wolfe Jr. wrote:

Boon-836 and Boon-22 are not ready to be merged because: Birth/Death dates are way too far about to merge at this time.

On 22 Jun 2015 at 23:33 GMT Dave Patrick wrote:

Boon-836 and Boon-22 appear to represent the same person because: I believe that these two George Boon/Boones represent the same individual.

On 19 Jan 2015 at 16:00 GMT Robin Lee wrote:

Thanks Janna for agreeing with the write up on this profile.

On 19 Jan 2015 at 10:00 GMT Janna Morrison wrote:

Wait... so...About George Boone I - the dates obviously don't work out:

His wife is born in 1571 and died in 1618 George was born in 1625 ...... 7 years after his wife died....... and 9 years after his son was born?

Their kids were born in 1616, 1635 and 1646 ..... 30 years apart? and to a mother that was dead since 1618.


George's father was born in 1516 His mother was born in 1519 Making both of them over 109 years old when they had him... I think not.

On 27 Oct 2014 at 21:27 GMT Robin Lee wrote:

Boone-1940 and Boon-836 appear to represent the same person because: same family and dates

On 14 Apr 2014 at 18:22 GMT Robin Lee wrote:

An incorrect merge was done on this profile. 6 January 2013 21:30: Ed Burke edited the data for Joane Dole. (Merged Fallace-1 into Healle-1) These were two distinctly different people and should not have been merged. I am in the process of cleaning up the issues that were created.

On 1 Apr 2014 at 00:36 GMT Hans Nielsen wrote:

Boone-1716 and Boon-22 do not represent the same person because: one is jr one is sr

more comments

B  >  Boon  |  B  >  Boone  >  George (Boon) Boone I