Isabella Elisabeth b. 10 Nov 1801 d.v Philip Rudolph Botha gedoopt 20 September 1772, burger te Graaff-Reinet, gehuwd 5 November 1791 met Maria Elisabeth Kruger[1]
Marriage
2 November 1829
1829, this second day of November 1829
Lucas Willem Bekker
marital status: Bachelor
residence: of this District
and
Isabella Elizabetha Bootha
marital status: Spinster
residence: of this District
were married here by banns
this second day of November 1829 by William Carlisle, Chaplain
This marriage was solemnized between us
groom signature: [Lukas Willem Bekker]
bride signature: [Isabella Botha]
witnessed by: Ocker Johnnis Gosen , Dorothear [ ]
Transcriber remarks: the ink of the sigantures has faded badly - largely guesswork to read them[2]
Death
Will
Sources
↑ Source: Genealogies of Old Cape Families, by C.C.de Villiers, revised, augmented and rewritten by C.Pama, A.A.Balkema, Cape Town, 1966. The original edition of 1894, compiled by G.M. Theal from the work of C.C. de Villiers Vol 1 Botha p94 [1]. Added by Alta Bekker Dec 1, 2015.
↑ Source: Grahamstown - St George (Anglican), Grahamstown, Eastern Cape. marriage register, 1826-1836, page 51, entry no 221. Repository: Cory Library, MS 14 879-1. Transcribed by Lynn MacLeod as part of the eGGSA Project, from photographs by William Jervois, and proofread by Sue Mackay Added by Alta Bekker Dec 1, 2015.
Is Isabella your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Isabella by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Isabella:
Botha-7544 and Botha-2303 are not ready to be merged because: Although they appear to be the same person, I have a problem with the supposed 2nd marriage to Lucas Bekker. The marriage record indicates she was a spinster - not a widow. The SAG Register only refers to one marriage. This needs further research & sorting out before the merge can go ahead.