no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

William Brock (abt. 1743)

William Brock
Born about [location unknown]
Ancestors ancestors
Son of [father unknown] and
Husband of — married 15 Jun 1772 [location unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Laura Harlow private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 18 Jan 2017
This page has been accessed 107 times.

Biography

The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
  1. 159 Damaris married _____ Brock. She was living when her uncle Paul (32) made his will, 3 February 1747/8. After all possible researches, the writer has been unable to find her husband's first name. Several Wentworths report that in olden time there were several Brocks, who professed to be related to them; among them John, Frances and Simeon. The names of the children of Damaris Brock are learned from the manuscript record of "Master Tate" which is preserved in Rollinsford, N.H. It says: Widow Damaris Brock, who was Damaris Wentworth had: Elizabeth, married John Kenny, John, Margaret, married Zaccheus Varney, Celia, William, Simeon, Martha, Frances, Sarah. William Brock who married 15 June 1772, widow Elizabeth Mason and had Elizabeth, born 23 May 1773; Martha, born 8 July 1776 and William, born 19 March 1782. Sally Brock married 10 February 1772, John Griswold. [1]

Sources

  1. "The Wentworth Genealogy comprising The Origin of the name, the Family in England and a particular account of Elder William Wentworth, the Emigrant and of his descendants". By John Wentworth, LL.D., of Chicago, Ill. In Two Volumes, Volume 1. 1870 Press of Alfred Mudge & Son, Boston, Mass. pages 117-118




Is William your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of William's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Osborne-1309 and Brock-3075 appear to represent the same person because: Merge of Osborne-1309 into Brock-3075
posted by Robin Rohlmann
Why would you propose a merge of two very different people?
posted by Laura (Marland) Harlow
Thank you Laura, however when i viewed from what i viewed they look similar, I was sent in my email a message to merge
posted by Robin Rohlmann
I am not sure what you are viewing, but they have different first names, different last names (and the ids are not similar Brock vs. Osborne), they have different parents, different spouses, and different children. They also lived in different areas. What about the profiles made them look similar? I am very baffled.
posted by Laura (Marland) Harlow
edited by Laura (Marland) Harlow
Brock-3075 and Osborne-1309 do not represent the same person because: None of the details are remotely similar.
posted by Laura (Marland) Harlow

B  >  Brock  >  William Brock

Categories: Estimated Birth Date