no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Anthony Browne (1552 - 1591)

Anthony Browne
Born in Cowdray, Sussex, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married about 1572 in Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 38 in Riverbank House, Cowdray Park, Easebourne, Sussex, Englandmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Magna Carta Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 21 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 6,081 times.
Magna Carta Project logo
Magna Carta Surety Baron Descendant (see text).
Join: Magna Carta Project
Discuss: magna_carta

Contents

Biography

Anthony Browne, son and heir apparent of Anthony Browne, K.G., K.B., 1st Viscount Montague, and his first wife Jane Radcliffe,[1] was born on or before 22 July 1552,[2][3] (the date his mother died "in childbed") at Cowdray, Sussex.[4] He may be the Anthony, son of Anthony, that was baptized 30 July 1553 in Easebourne, Sussex.[5]

Many online trees and sources incorrectly attribute the title "1st Viscount Montagu" to the Anthony of this profile, however that title belonged to Anthony's father (also named Anthony). This Anthony Browne died five months before his father and was not named in his father's will;[6] so he never inherited the title. His son Anthony inherited it on the death of his grandfather and was styled "2nd Viscount Montagu" in 1592.[4]

Marriage and Children

Anthony married Mary Dormer, daughter of William Dormer,[1] K.B., and his second wife, Dorothy Catesby.[2][4] They had at least two sons and three daughters:

  • Anthony Maria, 2nd Viscount Montagu,[2] married Jane Sackville[7] and had issue;[1] he was born 1 February 1573/4 and died 23 October 1629; was heir to his grandfather in 1592[4]
  • John,[2] married ____ Gifford and had issue[1][7]
  • possibly William: Richardson names only two sons, Anthony and John; however other sources name a third son, William Browne (d. 1637)[8] who died without issue[7]
  • Dorothy, married first to Edmund Lee, Esq.,[1][7] second to Robert Wolverstone, Gent., and third to William Ascue[2]
  • Jane, wife of Sir Francis Englefield[1][2][7]
  • Katherine,[7] wife of ______ Throckmorton (according to Sussex Visitations and Richardson),[1][2] but more likely wife of John Tregonwell of Milton Abbas[8] as evidenced by her will (see the research notes on Katherine's profile

Death

According to Richardson and Cokayne, Anthony Browne died on 29 June 1592 at Riverbank House in Cowdray Park, Easebourne, Sussex,[2] and was buried on 1 August 1592.[4] The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography entry for his father gives the death year as 1592.[9] However, his burial record gives the burial date as 1 August 1591 at Midhurst, Sussex. He is described in it as the "right worshipfull Sir Anthoney".[10][11]

A death year of 1591 is confirmed by the deed of settlement by Anthony's father of 20 January 1592 (the date given in the West Sussex Record Office catalogue entry) for the intended marriage of his (the father's) grandson and heir apparent Anthony Browne, son and heir to his late son Anthony Browne.[12] (Since Anthony's father died in October 1592, the 20 January 1592 date given in the catalogue entry for the settlement cannot be January 1592/3.)

Anthony's widow remarried first to Sir Edmund Uvedale, who died in 1606. She married third to Sir Thomas Gerard, as his third wife.[2][4] Thomas died in 1621. She had no issue with either of these husbands.[2] Mary died between 20 July 1637 and 23 November 1637. Her will requested her burial near her first husband, Anthony Browne, at Midhurst, Sussex.[2]

Research Notes

Data in Unsourced Online Trees

In some family trees uploaded to Ancestry and elsewhere, Anthony Browne is named Hackaliah Anthony Browne. There appears to be no evidence for his ever having the name Hackaliah.

Some trees also give his birth/death location as "Beachworth, Sussex", but without sources.

This Anthony has also been described as Sheriff of Surrey and Kent in 1580, but there is no source found for that information.

Prefix "Sir"

The prefix Sir was removed from this profile. Although his burial record refers to him as Sir, the January 1592 deed of settlement entered into by his father for the marriage of his son, cited above, describes him as Esq. Douglas Richardson does not say he was a knight. Nor does the Browne pedigree in the Harleian Society edition of the Sussex Visitations.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Thomas Benolte, et al. The Visitations of the County of Sussex: 1530 and 1633-4. London: The Harleian Society, 1905. Vol LIII, p. 84. Archive.org.
  2. 2.00 2.01 2.02 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.07 2.08 2.09 2.10 Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, Vol. V. Salt Lake City, UT: the author, 2013, pp. 137-138, TEMPLE 16: Anthony Browne.
  3. Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 2nd ed., vol. III. Salt Lake City, UT: the author, 2011, pp. 228-229, NELSON 15. Google Books.
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 George Edward Cokayne and H.A. Doubleday, et. al, eds. Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Vol. IX: Moels to Nuneham, 2nd ed. London, 1936, pp. 99-100. FamilySearch.
  5. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975", database, (FamilySearch: 19 September 2020), Entry for Anthoney Browen, 1553.
  6. West Sussex Record Office, ref. SAS-BA/67, catalogue entry
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 William Berry. County Genealogies: Pedigrees of the Families in the County of Sussex. London: Sherwood, Gilbert & Piper, 1830, p. 254. Google Books
  8. 8.0 8.1 Michael C. Questier. Catholicism and Community in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 2006, p. 521
  9. J.G. Elzinga. "Browne, Anthony, first Viscount Montagu (1528–1592), nobleman and courtier" in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. 23 Sep 2004. ODNB: his father.
  10. Sussex Burials, transcribed by Sussex Family History Group, FindMyPast
  11. "England Deaths and Burials, 1538-1991". FamilySearch and linked image made available by West Sussex Record Office
  12. West Sussex Record Office, ref. SAS-BA/65, catalogue entry, Deed of Settlement

Acknowledgements

Magna Carta Project

This profile was rereviewed and updated/expanded or the Magna Carta Project on 1 August 2022 by Thiessen-117.
Anthony Browne appears in a trail that was identified and badged by the Magna Carta Project from Gateway Ancestors John Nelson and Margaret Nelson to Magna Carta Surety Baron Saher de Quincy in 2015. Other trails were later identified and badged from the Nelsons to surety barons John de Lacy, Gilbert de Clare, Richard de Clare, Hugh le Bigod, Roger le Bigod, Robert de Vere and John FitzRobert. All these trails were re-reviewed/updated/badged in July/August 2022.They can be viewed in the Magna Carta Trails section of John Nelson's profile.
See Base Camp for more information about identified Magna Carta trails and their status. See the project's glossary for project-specific terms, such as a "badged trail".




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Anthony by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA test-takers in his direct paternal line. Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 16

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I have now added a short research note about the name Hackaliah. Feel free to edit this!
posted by Michael Cayley
I think your suggestion is a good one Michael.

Also, anyone up for working on the Browne-202#Montague Family Catalog information section?

posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
A merge has been proposed with the unsourced Hackaliah Anthony Browne, Browne-3345. Dates are the same, birth and death places different but in the same county, no family are given for Hackaliah Anthony Browne. This profile used to have Hackaliah as a forename, and it has rightly been removed. I would suggest the merge be approved. There seems to be a bit of a history of problems with the forename Hackaliah being added to this Anthony Browne. Do we need to think about adding a research note warning there is no evidence for him having the name Hackaliah?
posted by Michael Cayley
I looked at the history of changes for Anthony Browne, Browne-202 and see that Liz Shiflett removed the first name Hackaliah from that profile in September 2018. I suspect the same should be done here, and then the merge of the 2 profiles should go ahead, with birth and death places being those given in Browne-202. A quick websearch shows some unsourced trees uploaded to the web with Hackaliah as one forename, but there is no good evidence for it, and evidence suggests it was not one of his names. See for instance Helen Ford’s comment on Browne-202 dated 16 Sep 2018.
posted by Michael Cayley
Browne-202 and Browne-3345 appear to represent the same person because: The unsourced Browne-3345 has borrowed the Title and exact birth and exact death dates from profile Sir Anthony Browne (Browne-202). If they are not the same individual then that information should be removed from Browne-3345. For any questions please turn this issue over to a pre-1500 expert due to the famous nature of Sir Anthony Brown's line. Thanks.
Richardson's Royal Ancestry has Mary Dormer's line in Vol IV, pp 243-245 NEWDIGATE (with a ref to Temple 16 for Anthony)
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Browne-202 and Browne-3723 appear to represent the same person because: These have the same relatives.

The two birth locations are equivalent.

posted by David Barrington
Browne-202 and Browne-3345 do not represent the same person because: Apart from dates plucked form nowhere it seems, this really does not look like the same person.
posted by David Barrington
Second comment by Helen Coleman Ford. I think Browne-202 and Browne-3723 need to be merged.
posted by K. Stromsted
There is a probable duplicate https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Browne-3723.It was rejected at creation.I would think it probably occurred because the creator didn't recognise the name Hackaliah

I've asked again on G2G (bumped a 2016 post not answered) .If he had an odd baptismal name then obviously it has to be used for the proper name but there is no evidence for this. Richardson calls him Anthony. More importantly, his mother's memorial mentions that he was buried in the same place as her and was called Anthony. http://www.publicsculpturesofsussex.co.uk/object?id=274

Ah just realised that the proper name was changed back to Hackaliah on 15 January 2018 thus causing the problem.

posted by Helen (Coleman) Ford