John was born before 1776.
John Bruce married Sarah Butler on 11 April 1789 at St Mary's Lambeth, by license. They were bachelor and spinster, were both "of the parish", both signed the register, and witnesses were David Bruce and Elizabeth Phillips.[1] John Bruce was a brickmaker according to the marriage license.[2]
Sarah was admitted into the British Lying-In Hospital, Holborn, on 6 August 1791, her son James was born the same day, baptised on 18 August, and they were discharged from the hospital on 23 August. Hospital records had the information that Sarah was 29, her husband John was a brickmaker, and they lived at Lambeth. [3]
According to his son James's death certificate, James was born in Scotland and his parents were John Bruce, a baker, and Sarah Butler. James himself said in his convict indent, that he was from Arbroath, which is in Angus
So far there has only been one possibility found for his birth: There was a James Bruce whose birth was recorded in London in 1791 to parents John Bruce and Sarah Butler. (see above). However this john Bruce was a Brickmaker, not a Baker.
Why did James say he was born in Scotland if he was actually born in London?
Name | Registration Number | Father's Given Name(s) | Mother's Given Name(s) | District |
BRUCE JAMES | 3722/1874 | JOHN | SARAH | BATHURST |
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: John is 20 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 16 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 20 degrees from George Catlin, 21 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 29 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 19 degrees from George Grinnell, 26 degrees from Anton Kröller, 23 degrees from Stephen Mather, 18 degrees from Kara McKean, 23 degrees from John Muir, 17 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 33 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
I think the simple answer to this was that James was, to put it mildly, not the best or most honest of people. I suspect he claimed his birth was in Scotland so as to make more plausible a claim that he was descended from Robert THE Bruce - certainly my family thought he was, so he presumably made that claim during his lifetime. It's been a real eye-opener to find out what the REAL story was, I can tell you! :)