no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jane (Cree) Taylor (abt. 1776 - 1844)

Jane Taylor formerly Cree aka Bruce [uncertain]
Born about [location unknown]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1797 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 68 in St. Andrews, Manitoba, Canadamap
Profile last modified | Created 21 Sep 2021
This page has been accessed 793 times.

Contents

Biography

There is no known documentation surrounding Jane's dates of birth and death. Jane was apparently the daughter of a chief. She was Cree, and most likely Swampy Cree, or Lowland or Homeguard Cree. [1]

Marriage

Jane was united with the Sloop Master Captain George Taylor II circa 1797.[2] Jane 'formally' married George Taylor on January 11,1828 at Saint-Johns, Red River Settlements.[3]

Children

George Jane had nine children. There is no record of the baptisms of George and Jane Taylor's children in Rupert's Land, so we really don't know the order of their births. Their first children, George III., Peter and Thomas were reportedly born between 1798 and 1802.

  1. George III, born between 1798-1800 at York Factory, married: Jan 11, 1828 at St. John's, Red River Settlement, died: Nov 15, 1844; spouse: Jane Prince
  2. Peter, born between 1799 and 1802, died: Dec 12, 1839 in the Arctic, while on the Dease-Simpson Expedition.
  3. Thomas, born between 1800 and 1802, Red River Settlement, baptized: Aug 12, 1821, at: Norway House; married: Aug 16, 1831; spouse: Mary Keith. Death: 18 Dec 1879 in Pembroke, Ontario
  4. John, born circa 1804. His death September 5, 1809 as a youth is noted in the post records.
  5. Mary, born circa 1796, spouses: John Stuart & John Smith. Mary is mentioned in several books as being married to John Stuart when her sister Margaret arrived at their residence in 1829. Mary was abandoned by John Stuart in 1835. In 1837, Mary went to England, but returned in 1839. She married John Smith in 1847
  6. Margaret 'Peggy', born 1805 on the "Polar Sea", married: March 24, 1831 at Red River Settlement; spouse(s) Governor George Simpson & Louis Amable Hogue.
  7. Jane married in Saskatchewan to MacDougal.
  8. Ann "Nancy", born 1811, married: Aug 17, 1831; spouses: William Harper & John Cox
  9. Robert, born 1815. He reportedly accompanied his father to England and never returned. He had been in communication with his family until 1837 when he was a mate on a coaler belonging to either Sheilds or Newcastle.

Death

Jane's Last Will stated "When I die, if I leave any money, I wish it to be divided share and share alike among my four Daughters - Peggy married to Hogue, Mary living with her brother Thomas - Nancy married to Cox - and Jane married in the Saskatchewan." HBCA, A16/13

Sources

  1. "As Canadian As Can Be" [1]
  2. "Red River Ancestry" [2]
  3. Douglas N. Sprague, R. P. Frye., The Genealogy of the First Metis Nation 1820 - 1900.

See Also:

  • Captain George Taylor - HBC Record - Sloop Master [3]
  • Family Tree [4]
  • Roots Web Tree [5]

Acknowledgements

  • Thank you to Ellen for her patience and research




Is Jane your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Jane by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Jane:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Bruce-1157 married George Taylor II 11 Jan 1828 at St. Johns, Red River Settlement. They had 9 children, i.e.

George b. 1829+ Isabelle Cooper Edward b 1840 + Mary Sabiston Victoire b. 1837 + Alexander Thomas Robert b. 1837 + Elise Valeur Thomas b. 1843 + Marianne Young. Source : Douglas N. Sprague, R. P. Frye., The Genealogy of the First Metis Nation 1820 - 1900

posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Ellen Honeysett
Bruce-11122 and Bruce-1157 appear to represent the same person because: accidentally created a duplicate, sorry
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Laura (Karsky) Gerwood
Bruce-11122 and Bruce-1157 do not represent the same person because: Jane Bruce is the daughter-in-law of Jane. She married her son, George, the surveyor.
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Ellen Honeysett
Bruce-11122 and Bruce-1157 appear to represent the same person because: same persons
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Maggie N.
Bruce-11122 and Bruce-1157 do not represent the same person because: These are not the same women . Jane is the mother-in-law of Jane Bruce.
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Ellen Honeysett
Bruce-1157 and UNKNOWN-6612 appear to represent the same person because: Clearly the same people, same death date, despite LNAB Bruce (unclear why that's a thing)
posted on UNKNOWN-6612 (merged) by Alex Adkins-Langen
Cree-386 and UNKNOWN-6612 do not represent the same person because: We should use the Tribe Name of which she originated
posted on UNKNOWN-6612 (merged) by Darrell Parker
I would agree however, as I state in my comment on the other profile, I am not aware of any record explicitly identifying her as Cree. It is very likely that she was Cree, but we can't say for certain, which is why I think Unknown remains the most appropriate surname
posted on UNKNOWN-6612 (merged) by Alex Adkins-Langen
Bruce-1157 and Cree-386 appear to represent the same person because: similar dates, same spouse
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Laura (Karsky) Gerwood
Bruce-1157 and Cree-386 do not represent the same person because: Jane, the native wife of George Taylor, the sloopmaster was probably Honeguard Cree and not the same person as Jane Bruce who became her daughter-in-law.
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Ellen Honeysett
Bruce-1157 and Cree-386 appear to represent the same person because: Kindly review - References indicate Jane 'Cree' had a son who married Jane 'Prince'

Thank you

posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Mary (Traversy) Peterson
Bruce-1157 and Cree-386 do not represent the same person because: The woman whom George Taylor called Jane who has been identified as Jane Cree in various family trees has an unknown birthdate. Her son, George Taylor Jr. married Jane Price sometimes called Bruce. b. 1808 at Albany House on 11 Jan 1828 at Red River.
posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Ellen Honeysett
Bruce-1157 and Cree-386 appear to represent the same person because: Kindly review

Thank You

posted on Bruce-1157 (merged) by Mary (Traversy) Peterson
Cree-386 and UNKNOWN-6612 appear to represent the same person because: Though info doesn't necessarily match both profiles represent the same Jane who was the country wife of George Taylor
posted on UNKNOWN-6612 (merged) by Alex Adkins-Langen
Could we possibly change her family name from "Amerindian" to simply "Unknown"? Amerindian is an outdated term, and wikitree guidelines state that if the last name is unknown that it should be written as such. Alternatively, as per the Native American project guidelines, her last name could be changed to "Cree", as records seem to indicate that she was, in fact, Cree. I wouldn't go for this option though, seeing as there is no definitive proof linking her to any particular first nation.
posted on Amerindian-6 (merged) by Alex Adkins-Langen

C  >  Cree  |  T  >  Taylor  >  Jane (Cree) Taylor

Categories: Cree