no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Roger Bruce (abt. 1670 - 1733)

Roger Bruce
Born about in Sudbury, Middlesex, Massachusettsmap
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Husband of — married 1690 in Marlborough, Middlesex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 63 in Southborough, Worcester County, Massachusettsmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Rick Parrott private message [send private message] and Donovan Smith private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 27 May 2011
This page has been accessed 1,578 times.

Contents

Biography

This biography is a rough draft. It was auto-generated by a GEDCOM import and needs to be edited.

Name

Name: Roger /Bruce/[1]

= Probate

The will of Roger Bruce of Southborough was dated 8 December 1733 and proved on 7 February 1733/34 in Worcester. He mentioned his wife Elizabeth, and his children, Abijah Bruce, David Bruce, Daniel Bruce, Thomas Bruce, Sarah Bruce, Hannah Bruce, and Elisha Bruce (executor).[2]

Sources

  1. Source: #S165 Page: Ancestry Family Trees Data: Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=17838154&pid=581168722
  2. "Probate records v. 1 1731-1739, 1778-1814, 1863-1870" database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3Q9M-C9Y5-BDGB  : 31 January 2024), Film# 00774407, Worcester, Massachusetts, image 75, Vol 1, Page 110-111.
  • WikiTree profile Bruce-533 created through the import of Lent_Vise_2011-05-11aa.ged on May 26, 2011 by Bryan Sypniewski. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Bryan and others.
  • Source: S165 Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Name: Name: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members.;; NOTEThis information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created.

http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~nyschoha/brucefamily.html

  • 1-3. Roger Bruce b? 1670 d. Sept. 16, 1733?? signed will Dec. 8, 1733, proved Feb. 7, 1733/
  • m.? 1690 Elizabeth Forbush b. Mar. 16, 1669 Cambridge, Mass. dau. of Daniel Forbush & Rebecca Perriman

Ref: "The Identification of Elizabeth, Wife of Roger Bruce of Marlborough & Southborough, Mass." by Catherine R. Fahey, Winifred Fahey Pelley, and Miriam Fahey Rudd, 1981. 1-3-1. Samuel Bruce b. Mar. 24, 1691 Marl. b. Dec. 16, 1741 Holden, Mass. m. Marl. 1720 or 1721 Elizabeth Townshend d. Mar. 10, 1746 1-3-2. Abijah Bruce b. Nov. 22, 1693 Marl. d. Dec. 2, 1774 Marl. m. Marl. Jan. 14, 1718/9 Mary Woods, b. Mar. 13, 1686/7 Marl. 1-3-3. Elisha Bruce b. Sept. 14, 1695 Framingham m. Marl. June 18, 1718 Silence Newton b. Sept. 15, 169x, dau. of Saml. Newton & Rebecca 1-3-4. Rebecca Bruce b. Feb. 22, 1698 Framingham d. ?<1733 1-3-5. Sarah Bruce b. mar. 2, 1700 Framingham m. James Miller 1-3-6. Daniel Bruce b. Feb. 22, 1701 Marl. m. Marl. Bathsheba Bowker 1-3-7. Thomas Bruce b. Jan. 5, 1704 Marl. d. Mar. 2, 1743/4 Bolton, Mass. m. Sarah 1-3-8. Hannah Bruce b. Feb. 18, 1706 Marl. m. May 3, 1731 Joseph Townsend 1-3-9. Deliverance b. Sept. 9, 1709 Marl. d. ?<1733 1-3-10. David Bruce b. June 9, 1711 Marl. d. > 1772

NEHGR Oct. 1982 p. 301/3 History of Framingham, Mass. by Wm. Barry, 1847





Is Roger your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Roger by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Roger:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Bruce-752 and Bruce-533 appear to represent the same person because: Dates, parents, spouse match.
posted by Bob Keniston Jr.

B  >  Bruce  >  Roger Bruce