no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Budd II (bef. 1625)

John Budd II
Born before in Whitechapel, Stepney, London, Englandmap
[sibling(s) unknown]
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] in Englandmap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 25 Oct 2012
This page has been accessed 2,032 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
John Budd II is currently protected by the Puritan Great Migration Project for reasons described in the narrative.
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: PGM
A previous version of this profile claimed that this John Budd (baptized 12 May 1625 in Stepney, England) was the same as the John Budd-1458, son of the immigrant John Budd to New Haven and Rye. However, there is no proof that the Stepney family emigrated, and far more evidence that it was the Chichester Budd family that emigrated (including the John Budd baptized 22 February 1630[/31] at the Church of Saint Andrew-in-the-Oxmarket in Chichester, Sussex, England. This profile has been updated to reflect this. Because of the confusion about his origins and relations, this profile is being protected and co-managed/tracked by the Puritan Great Migration project.

Biography

John Budd, son of John Budd and Katherin [no maiden name given] was baptised: May 12, 1625 St. Mary Whitechapel, Stepney, London, England.[1]

Other possible birth/ bp exist as shown on Free Reg: https://www.freereg.org.uk/search_queries/5a4b0d73f493fd0c29a8175e

There is no evidence that this John or his parents left Stepney for New England. See the profile of John Budd who emigrated.

There is no further record yet found of what became of the Stepney Budd family.

Sources

  1. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NBCW-S36 : 11 February 2018, John Budd, 12 May 1625); citing , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 94,691.

See also:

  • Jack Harpster, John Ogden, the Pilgrim (1609-1692), Madison Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickensian University Press (2006), pages 10-12.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 16

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
See the documentation for John Budds of Stepney and Chichester

See https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PI-RdQQNwSw8NVv1WmJHCTg7cyvUcN8Wo7bpnCwGAC4/edit# for details.

posted by Anne X
edited by Anne X
This profile has now been updated to distinguish him from son of the immigrant to Connecticut, Southold and Rye.
posted by Jillaine Smith
If it is accurate that John Budd-142 and John Budd-1458 are *not* matches, this bio for -142 needs to be updated.

Thanks.

Budd-1458 and Budd-142 do not represent the same person because: John budd born 1630 Chichester is not the same as John Budd born Stepney b. 1625. Different birth dates and places.

See G2g feed. [1].

posted by Anne X
Budd-1458 and Budd-142 appear to represent the same person because: Suggesting a rejected match as put forth by John B. In Feb 2019. If we’re going to consider John Budd and Katherine Browne a separate couple from Lt. John Budd II and Katherine Butcher we need to indicate it with some note for all to understand. I’m still confused about each couples children. Both sets appear to have the same children Sarah and Joseph. A note is needed to clarify the uncertainty of their parents and explain why showing as half siblings or 3 different profiles for similar names.
I understand the Stepney Budds are being separated from the Chichester Budds; however, something needs to be done with all the duplicate children (especially Sarah and Joseph). If these children are all separate and distinct they can’t ALL be linked to Mary Horton and/or John Budd as their parents. Please also add notes at the top of the Katherine Butcher vs. Browne profiles to let people know they are being viewed as 2 different people. Thanks.
FYI- I’ve submitted 2 merger requests to solve the problem of 3 Sarah Budd’s. Budd-1616 will merge with 269. And Budd-686 will merge with 269. The father, John Budd- on 1616 will need to be removed and merged with Lt John Budd II (Budd-142).
I agree with Anne. Whereas we have now agreed to split the Stepney Budds from the Chichester Budds, it would seem that a further split between the Stepney Budds and the 'emigrating Lieutenants' of Southold may be on the cards. Any evidence for the Stepney Budds' emigration at all - I may have missed something? Have you guys already done this anyway? If not, it might be a good idea to split, then set up a rejected match and say why... A bit devious perhaps but it will help to keep the two lots of data separate and tidy.
posted by David Barrington
I've relinked the baptism image that was here to Budd-1458, the profile it applies to (baptised 22 Feb 1630/1 at Chichester)
posted by [Living Horace]
Asserting that he is the son of John Budd of Stepney is just that - an assertion. An evidential link between the John Budd of Stepney and the John Budd of Southold has not been demonstrated.
posted by Anne X
Since there is now a different John Budd II established as the son of John Budd & Katherine Butcher, would it be okay to clean up the Bio to assert that this John Budd II is the son of John Budd of Stepney? Perhaps move the old discussion of the other John Budd to a different section, such as research notes? What do you think?
posted by Bill Catambay

B  >  Budd  >  John Budd II

Categories: Puritan Great Migration Adjunct