no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hepzibah (Buell) Belden (1649 - aft. 1704)

Hepzibah Belden formerly Buell
Born in Windsor, Hartford County, Colony of Connecticut, British Colonial Americamap
Wife of — married 12 Jan 1673 [location unknown]
Wife of — married 17 Feb 1699 in Deerfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts Baymap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 54 in Deerfield, Franklin, Massachusetts Bay, British Colonial Americamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Merilee Burton private message [send private message] and Michael Campbell private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 21 Dec 2010
This page has been accessed 1,459 times.

Biography

Hepzibah (Buell) Belden aka Wells was born in 1649. She was the daughter of William Buell and Mary Buell. She passed away in 1704. She was first in 1699 partially scalped and survived only to be captured in the French and Indian raid in 1704 with 104 men women and children. It is called Queen Anne's War. A List of captives can be found at Deerfield Captives of Deerfield.

She married Thomas Welles Junior on January 12, 1673. He passed away in 1691.

"June 6, 1693. The Widow Hepzibah Welles' three daughter were knock'd in the head and scalp'd; two of them died, but the other lived."

She married Daniel Belden/Belding on February 17, 1699. Daniel Belding had already lost a wife in an Indian raid.

"In the desolation which befell Deerfield, by an incursion of the French and Indians, February 29, 1703/4, Mrs. Welles herself, then Mrs. Belden, together with Rev. Mr. John Williams and his wife and children, and about one hundred and twenty of the neighbors, were by them taken captive and marched for Canada: but, horrible to relate, Mrs. Belden together with Mrs. Williams and several other women, were most cruelly put to death on the way."

  • Fact: Christening (11 December 1649) Windsor, Hartford, Colony of Connecticut, British Colonial America
  • Fact: Vital Records (11 December 1649) Connecticut births and christenings Windsor, Hartford, Connecticut, British Colonial America
  • Fact: Burial (1704) Deerfield, Franklin, Massachusetts Bay, British Colonial America
  • Fact: URL Http://Www.Utw.Com/~lmadams/D0002/G0000098.Html#i1101
  • Fact: URL Http://Www.Surnames.Com/Gedcom/Stalzer_arlene/I0000910.Htm
  • Fact: http://familysearch.org/v1/LifeSketch -Hepzibah, dau. of William Buel of Windsor, she married 1rst, Lieutenant Thomas Wells and was his widow, when in 1693 the Indians attacked her house. Two daughters were killed and, says Stephen Williams, a third daughter and she, herself, were also "knocked on the head and scalped." The next year she asked aid from the congregations of Connecticut. In 1699 she married Daniel Belding, was captured in 1704 and killed on the journey to Canada. (Possible death on route to Quebec, Canada)

From Windsor, Thomas and Hepzibah moved to Hadley, MA, in 1673; then to Deerfield in 1684. In June 1693, Hepzibah and 3 of her daughters were scalped by Indians in Deerfield. She and one daughter survived. From The History of the Buell family in England, p 17.

  • Fact: URL Http://Www.Nstep.Net/Dorgon/Martincom/Anc13.Htm
  • Fact: URL Http://Www.Vitrex.Net/~chenille/Humphrey.Wbg/Wga4.Html#i459
  • Fact: URL Http://Www.Flash.Net/~robt/D0001/G0000029.Html#i1482


Sources






Is Hepzibah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Hepzibah's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Buel-210 and Buel-3 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate
posted by Carolyn Adams
Buel-210 and Buell-21 appear to represent the same person because: This is a clear duplicate. The daughter Hepzibah was named for the mother. There is good documentation for this family. Request that LNAB for Buel-210 be edited to Buell prior to merge.
posted by Carolyn Adams
Buel-97 and Buel-3 appear to represent the same person because: The only impediment to their not being the same person is the birth date. There is no viable source for the birth date for Buel-97 and it is unreasonable to assume that Daniel Belden would marry someone 30 years younger than he. In addition, his third wife was born in 1655, which would indicate that he would have married someone of about the same age as he as his second wife.
posted by Jess Wallace

B  >  Buell  |  B  >  Belden  >  Hepzibah (Buell) Belden

Categories: Raid on Deerfield