Thomas Burgess
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Burgess (abt. 1604 - 1685)

Thomas Burgess aka Burge, Burges
Born about in Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1628 in Englandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 81 in Sandwich, Plymouth Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 1 Jun 2010
This page has been accessed 14,407 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Thomas Burgess migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See The Directory, by R. C. Anderson, p. 50)
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Contents

Disputed Origins

A christening of 16 Aug 1601[1] in Truro, Cornwall, England has been assigned to Thomas Burgess, the emigrant, but this infant seems to have died the following month.

Supposedly a will of Thomas Burgess, merchant of Cornwall, dated 20 Sep 1619, probated 12 Dec 1622 (PCC 127 Swann = Waters, Gleanings 992) mentions a son Thomas.[2]

But if the emigrant was he who married Dorothy Wayne way across England in York, it's not likely these were the same men.

Bottom line: The origins of Thomas Burgess remain unknown.

Distinguishing him from another Thomas Burgess

An examination of early New England colonists at sea identifies one Thomas Burgess who may have been a contemporary of Thomas of Sandwich:

"Borges R[iver] shows up for Thomas Burges (d. 1683) of Charlestown and later Concord. About 1645, Burges had been back to Northamptonshire as attorney in land matters for Thomas James (d. 1666) of Salem, whose own estate was finally settled in Salem although he had died in Albermarle, Carolina. Thomas Burges made a will on 9 August 1662 'being Now Bound A voiage to Sae," and five days later the exploratory expedition sailed southward. Just before the migratory expedition, on 20 January 1662/3, Buges sold 20 acres in Woburn, a git from Mr. George Bunker."[3]

Disputed Wives

That his wife's name was Dorothy is supported by a 1654 land deed:

This Bargane and sale acknowlidged by Thomas Burgis senir and Dorathy his wife this 5t of Aprill 1654 before mee Myles Standish The Marke of Tho T Burgis.[4]

Winifred Lovering Holman's "Burgess Lineage, 1957-1958," a typescript in the New England Historic-Genealogical Society library, gives Dorothy Phippen as being the wife of this Thomas Burgess.

It has been suggested that he was the Thomas Burgess who married a Dorothy Wayne in Tanfield, York, England, in 1628.[5]

A marriage license was found for Thomas Burgess and Dorothy Waynes for 1628 at Tanfield, England, parish of Chester-Le-Street, Durham County. The ancestry of Thomas Burgess is not certain. Research indicates several possible roots. On January 12, 1995, Paul F. Burgess, author of "The Burgess History Tree", wrote a letter to "The Burgess Bulletin" and stated that he had hired a researcher in England. The researcher indicated several possible connections but did state that he was not the Thomas born in 1601 in Truro, which is the one with the Pye/Phippen connections. Other possible connections include: Thomas Burgess baptized 2 Oct 1603, son of Thomas Burgess and Elizabeth Seddon of Lancashire; Another Thomas Burgess was baptized 4 Nov 1603 and his wife, Dorothy Goodman, baptized in 1613 at Coffinswell, Devonshire, England. This leads to speculation since Thomas was known as "The Goodman Burgess" in early New England records.

An additional name, Goodman, has also been suggested, evidence unknown. Note that "goodman" was a title frequently used in colonial times.

Disputed Children

  1. Ruth (who supposedly married Richard Taylor, of the Rock, of Yarmouth): "Various records exist about these family members, yet none refer to an additional daughter named Ruth nor a son-in-law Richard Taylor. No other Burgess of appropriate age to be father of a Ruth is found in the records. Further working against [the theory that Ruth (______) Taylor was daughter of Thomas Burgess] is that none of [her] children... had Burgess family given names."[6]
  2. Deborah (who supposedly married Nathan Fish), but subsequent research has associated her as likely daughter of this Thomas' son Jacob by the latter's wife Mary Nye.[7]

The will of Thomas Burgess named four sons -- Thomas, Jacob, John and Joseph -- and one son-in-law, Ezra Perry (who is also named in the above land deed).[8],[9] Ezra Perry married Elizabeth Burgess 12 Feb 1651/2.[10]

Biography

Thomas Burgess and his family immigrated to Salem, MA, about 1630 and settled in Lynn.[8]

That he is not included in Robert C. Anderson's Great Migration Begins series (which covers immigrants from 1620-1635) suggests he did not emigrate this early (1630). The Great Migration Directory gives his arrival as about 1637.[11]

On July 3, 1637 a section of land was assigned to him in Duxbury. In 1638 he forfeited his land in Duxbury and moved to Sandwich in the section called Sagamore. In 1640 he served as Grand Juryman. In 1642, 1645, 1648, 1654, 1660, 1662, and 1668 he served as Deputy to Plymouth General Court. In August 1643 he was on the list of men "able to bear arms". In 1645, 1662, 1663, and 1678 he served as Surveyor of Highways. In 1667 and 1672 he served as Selectman. On August 18, 1645 Thomas and 4 other men from Sandwich began 13 days of service in hostilities with the Narrangansett Indians. On March 3, 1654 Thomas received a grant of land in Manomot as reward for his service.[citation needed]

He is mentioned in many of the early records of Sandwich.

Thomas Burgess died in Sandwich on 23 February 1685. This record is a copy made from the ancient originals in 1869 by the town clerk.[12][13] It was also recorded in the published volume of vital records as 23 February 1685.[14][15] The year was recorded as 1685, though it may have been 1685/6. A replacement gravestone erected by his descendants can be found in the Old Town Cemetery in Sandwich, Massachusetts.[13]

Property

He was granted a tract of land purchased for him by Miles Standish of Indian Josiah Dwelling.[16]

THOMAS BURGE, SR., TO EZRA PERRY 1663 Prence Govr: The 10th of July 1663 Memorand: That Thomas Burge senr of the Towne of Sandwich in in the Jurisdiction of Plymouth in New England plantor Doth acknowlidg that for and in Consideration of a valluable sume; to him already payed by his son in law Named Esra Perrey of the Towne aforsaid in the Jurisdiction aforsaid plantor; hee hath bargained and sold enfeofed and Confeilmed and by these prsents Doth bargaine allianate sell enfeof and Confeirme unto the said Esra Perrey the one halfe of a Certaine tract of land lying and being att a place Called Mannomett in the Jurisdiction aforsaid; which said Tract of land was purchased by Captaine Standish by the appointment of the Court of Josias of Nausett an Indian Sachem; in the behalfe of the said Thomas Burge as appeers by a Deed bearing Date the third Day of march Anno Dom 1652 and is That Thomas Burgis of Sandwidge hath absolutly barganed and sold to ffrancis Allen of Sandwidge to him and heires for ever a pcell or tract of land being within a ffence which said upland I the said Thomas Burgis senr bought of Thomas Boardman. as also a pcell of meadow bought of the said Thomas Boardman as aforsaid this meadow bounded with 2 Creekes lying before or Joyning to the aforsaid upland to the said ffrancis Allen to have and to hold to him and his heires forever;
This Bargane and sale acknowlidged by Thomas Burgis senir and Dorathy his wife this 5t of Aprill 1654 before mee Myles Standish The Marke of Tho T Burgis.[17]

Children

  1. Thomas Burgess Jr., the eldest, of Rhode Island
  2. John
  3. Jacob
  4. Joseph[18]
  5. Daughter who married Ezra Perry

NO DAUGHTER RUTH.

Last Will & Testament

Will of Thomas Burgess "of Sandwich", dated 4 Apr 1684.[8][19] In his Will, he names:

Wife
Sons:
  • Thomas the eldest, of Rhode Island
  • John
  • Jacob
  • Joseph
  • "my son" Ezra Perry
Grandsons:
  • Thomas, son of Jacob
  • Thomas, son of John

The Executors were Ezra Perry and Jacob Burgess, and the witnesses were Thomas Tupper and Martha Tupper.

Martha Tupper swore before the Governor and Magistrate on 02 March 1684/5 to Thomas Burg's will. Thomas Tupper made oath in court on 05 March 1684/5 to Thomas Burg signing, sealing & declared his last will.[19]

Sources

  1. LDS International Genealogical Index
  2. "Ancestry of President Ruther B. Hayes," in The American Genealogist, 56(1980):234
  3. "New Englanders at Sea," in NEHGR, 124(1970):93
  4. "Plymouth Colony Deeds," in The Mayflower Descendant, 8(1906):73, citing page 122
  5. "Paver's Marriage Licenses," in Yorkshire Archaeological Journal, 20 (1909):74
  6. Jillaine S. Smith, "Two Richard Taylor Families of Yarmouth," in NEHG Register, 165(2011):191
  7. "The Wife of Nathan Fish of Falmouth," in NEHGR 138(1984):132
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 Ebenezer Burgess. Burgess genealogy. Boston: Press of T. R. Marvin & son, 1865. Open Library Page 9-12
  9. Lydia B. (Phinney) Brownson and Maclean W. McLean, "Ezra Perry of Sandwich, Mass. (c. 1625-1689)," Register, 115(1961):86-99
  10. Kardell and Lovell, Vital Records of Sandwich, 1:12
  11. Anderson, Robert Charles, The Great Migration Directory, (NEHGS, 2015) page 50.
  12. "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:33SQ-GRSY-8F3?cc=2061550&wc=Q4DM-JWP%3A353349701%2C353349702%2C353359201 : 22 October 2020), Barnstable > Sandwich > Births, marriages, deaths 1803-1842 > image 286 of 295; citing Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston. Sandwich Town Records, volume marked "Births 1803-1942, Deaths 1803-1842, Intentions of Marriages & Marriages 1813-1837"
  13. 13.0 13.1 Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/38446827/thomas-burgess: accessed 14 August 2023), memorial page for Thomas Burgess Sr. (16 Aug 1601–13 Feb 1685), Find A Grave: Memorial #38446827 citing Old Town Cemetery, Sandwich, Barnstable County, Massachusetts, USA; Maintained by G R Wise Gittens (contributor 47132213). at findagrave.com, with photos of a gravestone erected in 1917 by descendants.
  14. Vital Records of Sandwich, Massachusetts to 1885. Volume One. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1996. p. 10. Link to page at archive.org.
  15. See image of certified death record attached to this profile, which is taken from the Volume shown as "Births 1803-1942, Deaths 1803-1842, Intentions of Marriages & Marriages 1813-1837"
  16. "Plymouth Colony Deeds," in Mayflower Descendant, 2(1900):29, citing 37 (1652)
  17. "Plymouth Colony Deeds," in The Mayflower Descendant, 8(1906):73, citing page 122
  18. "Plymouth Colony Deeds," in The Mayflower Descendant, 18(1916):89, citing p. 125: a 1663 land deed made by Thomas Burgess Sr. to his son Joseph Burge.
  19. 19.0 19.1 "Massachusetts, Plymouth County, Probate Records, 1633-1967," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-897D-VSB1 : 16 march 2023), Wills 1633-1686 vol 1-4 > image 583 of 616; State Archives, Boston.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Thomas's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 33

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I am a direct decendant. Jacob (Jake) Burgess. I would appreciate if someone could reach out to educate me on my family history. My Best
posted by Jacob Burgess
I am also a direct descendant. If you can get a copy of Ebenezer Burgess's book: ", Burgess Genealogy: Memorial of Thomas and Dorothy Burgess, who were settled at Sandwich in the Plymouth Colony in 1637", Press of T. R. Marvin & Son 1865, it has a lot of interesting information in it.
posted by Kay Burgess
The LNAB is set to Burgess, causing his, his children and his grandchildren to have the same LNAB. The spelling "Burgess" for this family was normalized in the 19th century, which is why so many people use it as a default for all the generations of Thomas's family. For the earlier generations it's anachronistic, and it's not even obvious that the name had an "s" at the end until some people (evidently not family members) started to add it in the 17th century in Plymouth Colony. It's phonetically similar to the names "Birch" (also Burch), and "Burrage," so assuming the "s" or "ss" belong there is debatable. Thomas was illiterate, but his sons Jacob and Joseph signed "Burg," and the spelling used by clerks or literate stand-ins in contemporary records was phonetic and fluid (Burg, Burge, Burgis, Burges, Birg, Birge and even Borg). The Sandwich Town Clerk in the 1650s spelled it "Burgis." In the 1670s in Sandwich records it was "Birg" or "Birge." I don't know how to solve this, but it would be better to pick one of the contemporary spellings for the LNAB and do an aka and add a few more (but not Burgess!). I suggest Burg or Burge. Either of those would be an improvement. At some point more of Thomas's descendants became literate and chose a spelling, which makes it easier. Thanks.
posted by Doug Sinclair
I think we use the Burgess 'normalized spelling' partly because one of the earliest records is in 1654, where it was written "This Bargane and sale acknowlidged by Thomas Burgis senir and Dorathy his wife this 5t of Aprill 1654 before mee Myles Standish The Marke of Tho T Burgis." His will was written using the Burg spelling, but then he signed his mark, so had no say in the spelling. So I think we've decided on the Burgess spelling as a compromise to hope we avoid the creation of duplicate profiles, then use the OLN for additional spellings found in the contemporary documents. If we ever find his birth/baptism/marriage records, I expect we'll then change the spelling based on that document.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
I understand, but what triggered my broader question was the profile of his son Joseph saying "Joseph Burge" formerly "Burgess." I see there is an "aka" for alternate names, which in this case is more accurate. I don't know what is a default in the wikitree program or what's chosen by the person creating the profile, but in either case I didn't see a way to change it.
posted by Doug Sinclair
There is not a "default" per se, one makes a choice when creating each profile. But when one adds a child to an existing profile, the assumption by the system is that the surname is the same as the parent, but that can be overridden. Only a profile manager can *change* the LNAB on an existing profile, or when a merge of duplicates is worked, so one must collaborate on a request to change it. If it can be documented that there is a contemporary birth or baptism record, or a record created by the person themselves where they knowingly spelled their name a certain way, then I would consider a change in the LNAB. Our Thomas apparently was not literate, he signed by a mark. We don't make LNAB changes lightly, see: Help: correcting a LNAB.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
You're referring to changes specifically to the LNAB. It was the "formerly" vs "aka" that I was wondering about. Thomas has "Burgess aka Burge, Burges." Joseph has "Burge formerly Burgess," which I assume is the default from Thomas's LNAB. But "formerly" indicates a name change, which isn't correct. If "aka" and "formerly" are tethered to the LNAB and changing those requires modification of the LNAB, then the correction seems pretty straightforward in this case to someone not familiar with the process. LNAB itself doesn't change, but "formerly" is changed to "aka," which, for Joseph, would read "Burgess aka Burge" (Burge is debatable, but that's beside the current question). I looked for this answer in the G2G forum, but found a sea of threads that didn't address it. Thanks for your response(s).
posted by Doug Sinclair
Joseph's profile name fields should probably be discussed with the profile managers for that profile. There are specific rules for each name field. If you can explain your position to the PMs of that profile, I would expect they'll understand your points.
posted by Bobbie (Madison) Hall
Burgess-9731 and Burgess-548 appear to represent the same person because: same name, spouse in process of merge, son Joseph in process of merge. Thank you for reviewing. Teresa (WikiTree Arborist)
posted by Teresa Downey
This is from a book form I believe this is the book it came from This is information from the Ebenezer Burgess book:

BURGESS GENEALOGY, MEMORIAL OF THE FAMILY OF THOMAS AND DOROTHY BURGESS, WHO WERE SETTLED AT SANDWICH, IN THE PLYMOUTH COLONY, IN 1637. BOSTON: PRESS OF T. R. MARVIN & SON, 42 CONGRESS STREET. 18 6 5.

posted by Andrea (Stawski) Pack
Lorretta, please read the disputed wives section and the profile of his Unknown wife. There is no proof that she was Dorothy Waynes.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Joe, I don't know if the disputed wife got changed but it currently does suggest she was a Wayne. It's confusing. And does not conclude anything.
posted by Jillaine Smith
Burges-75 and Burgess-548 appear to represent the same person because: Same person. Minor spelling variation.
posted by Joe Cochoit
Thanks Darell. Unless I'm missing something, the only mention of his wife is her first name and death date. And the list of children match other records (and exclude Ruth and Deborah, aligning with what's here.) Looks like there is good info about subsequent generations.
posted by Jillaine Smith
I think there is some clarifications with regard wife and his disputed wives, I wasn't referring to origins. It does give a list of the children.
posted by Darrell Parker
Darrell, that 1865 book points out that his origins are not known. Was there something in particular you found that adds to what we have here already?
posted by Jillaine Smith
This might be a good source to help sort out the confusion

https://archive.org/stream/burgessgenealog00burggoog#page/n26/mode/2up

posted by Darrell Parker

B  >  Burgess  >  Thomas Burgess

Categories: Puritan Great Migration