no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Unknown) Belden (abt. 1635 - 1677)

Mary Belden formerly [surname unknown]
Born about in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut Colonymap [uncertain]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1655 in Wethersfield, Hartford, Connecticut Colonymap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 42 in Hatfield, Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 9 Mar 2017
This page has been accessed 1,009 times.
Massachusetts state seal
Mary (Unknown) Belden is a part of Massachusetts history.
Join: Massachusetts Project
Discuss: massachusetts

Contents

Disputed Origins

Some Internet sources and at least one modern source list her as “Mary Hastings”. [1] This is likely due to confusing this Mary, or her daughter Mary, with Mary Burt Belden Hastings (1676-1734); they are not the same.

Biography

Samuel Belding and Mary were married about 1654[2] or 1655, Wethersfield, Hartford County, Connecticut.[3]

Their children are:

  1. Mary BELDING, born on 10 July 1655.[4]
  2. Samuel BELDING
  3. Sachen BELDEN
  4. Stephen BELDING (our line)
  5. Sarah BELDING
  6. Elizabeth BELDING
  7. Ann BELDING (BELDEN)
  8. Ebenezer BELDING
  9. John BELDING

The following child is not listed as a child of Samuel and Mary by Savage's Genealogical Dictionary, Stiles' History of Wethersfield, Judd's History of Hadley, Wells' History of Hatfield or the Vital Records of Hadley, Hatfield or Wethersfield. Do this child belong to a different family?

Elizabeth b. Feb 1662/63 [5]

Mary, the first wife of Samuel Belden, was killed in an Indian attack on 19 Sept 1677[6][7] at Hatfield, Massachusetts. [7][8][9]

Sources

  1. Scott, Fred W. Clifton William Scott and Mildred Evelyn Bradford Scott of Ashfield, Mass: Ancestors, Descendants and New England Heritage. iUniverse, 2004
  2. Ancestry.com. U.S., Craftperson Files, 1600-1995 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2014.
  3. Torry, Clarence A. New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Baltimore, MD, USA: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2004.
  4. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F776-P3R : 7 January 2020), Marry in entry for Marry Beldin, 1655.
  5. "Massachusetts Marriages, 1695-1910, 1921-1924", database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHH9-8XY : 28 July 2021), Elisabeth Belding in entry for Henry Gilbert, 1682.
  6. Savage, James. A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England Showing Three Generations of Those Who Came Before May, 1692. Vol. I-IV. Boston, MA, USA: 1860-1862.
  7. 7.0 7.1 Stiles, Henry Reed. Families of Ancient Wethersfield Connecticut; Consisting of the History of Ancient Wethersfield, Comprising the Present Towns of Wethersfield, Rocky Hill, and Newington; and of Glastonbury Prior to Its Incorporation in 1693, from Date of Earliest Settlement Until the Present Time, with Extensive Genealogies and Genealogical Notes on Their Families. Vol II. 1904.
  8. Torrey, Clarence Almon. New England Marriages to 1700. Volume 1, Page(s): 125.
  9. "Massachusetts Deaths and Burials, 1795-1910", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FC9C-CPK : 17 January 2020), Mary Belding, 1677.

Other Sources

See also:

  • Lucius Boltwood, "Genealogies of Hadley Families."
  • Baildon History England, By Kinnexion family

Research Notes

  • Richard Belding was born to Sarah Curtiss Belding, not Mary Unknown Belding: "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001", database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q29L-LHKV : 10 November 2020), Richard Belding, 1672.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Burt-1008 and Unknown-359005 are not ready to be merged because: fixing stuck proposed merge - needs to be rejected
posted by Susan McNamee
Unkown-1471 and Unknown-359005 appear to represent the same person because: Same husband, same date of death, no conflicting info
Traditionally the first wife of Samuel Belden is Mary Unknown. Hastings has come along in more modern times, and so far I have discovered no reason or proof, why she is believed to be Mary Hastings.
posted by Anne B
Traditionally the first wife of Samuel Belden is Mary Unknown. Hastings has come along in more modern times, and so far I have discovered no reason or proof, why she is believed to be Mary Hastings.
posted by Anne B
Wells-1728 and Hastings-885 are not ready to be merged because: there's nothing obvious here apart from the similarity of the names of the husbands.
posted by Brian McCullough

[Do you know Mary's family name?]  |  B  >  Belden  >  Mary (Unknown) Belden

Categories: King Philip's War | Massachusetts Project-Managed