10 March 1717 born in Pomfret, Windham, Connecticut to Samuel and Hannah Carpenter[1]
2 January 1741/2 banns were posted in Rehobeth, Connecticut for the marriage of Samuel Carpenter of Rehobeth and Keziah Carpenter of Pomfret. The marriage was solemnized in another town[2][3]
Children
Children of Samuell and Kezia (Unknown) Carpenter:
"In the CM on page 133 is an extract of a deed whereas Samuel & Keziah Carpenter sells for 190 pounds 1/5th of the lands to brother William Carpenter, husbandman, of Cumberland, Providence, colony of Rhode Island in New England. This land belonged to their father, deceased (Keziah's father also mentioned as deceased) of Attleboro, but the Royal authority now says that part of land is now annexed to RI so the sale was done. Signed and dated 10 Nov. 1748."[4]
Sources
↑ "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F74K-YV3 : 11 February 2018), Samuell Carpenter, 10 Mar 1717; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
↑ Arnold, James Newell. Vital Record of Rehoboth, 1642-1896: Marriages, Intentions, Births, Deaths, Volumes 3-4. Providence, RI: Narragansett Historical Publishing Company, 1897. Page 437.
↑ "Massachusetts Marriages, 1695-1910," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FHG8-4LJ : 9 February 2018), Samuel Carpenter and Keziah Carpenter, 02 Jan 1742; citing reference ; FHL microfilm 1,987,644.
Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Carpenter-16272 and Carpenter-3830 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate. Profiles linked to Carpenter-3830 (wife, parents) currently Unsourced and may not be accurate.