no image

Sarah (Churchill) Blakey

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Sarah Blakey formerly Churchill
Born [date unknown] [location unknown]
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Mother of
Died about [location unknown]
Profile last modified | Created 21 Feb 2011
This page has been accessed 383 times.

This person was created through the import of Acrossthepond.ged on 21 February 2011. The following data was included in the gedcom. You may wish to edit it for readability.


Date: ABT 1690

Removed ABT from Death Date and marked as uncertain.

User ID

User ID: 1E9A982C3E0648548DB0125B76E98B2F1FA3

More Genealogy Tools

Sponsored Search

Searching for someone else?
First: Last:

No known carriers of Sarah's mitochondrial DNA have taken an mtDNA test and no close relatives have taken a 23andMe, AncestryDNA, or Family Tree DNA "Family Finder" test.

Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


On 8 Mar 2017 at 14:38 GMT Mikey Anonymous wrote:

My question is still why does this profile even exist? No sources, no birth date, only an estimated death date that generates a db_error. No profile improvement since being imported from gedcom 6 years ago.

We have solid evidence (the family Bible pages that include entries by Sarah George) that Churchill Blakey's mother was Susannah - why is Sarah attached instead w/o evidence? I know *how* it happened: I had Susannah on the other profile before the merge, but Sarah was chosen during the merge. What I don't get is *why*.

I'm not a PM here but it shows up as an error in my list because of the son being attached. I'd like to resolve it before some data doctor unfamiliar with the family comes along and starts changing the wrong things to make the error go away.

Can start G2G if need

On 26 Jun 2016 at 01:30 GMT Cheryl (Stone) Caudill wrote:

Churchill Blakey could not have been born a year after his mother died.

On 31 Jan 2016 at 22:23 GMT Mikey Anonymous wrote:

Apparently we lost a connection from the merge. I have Churchill son of Thomas Blakey and Catherine Susannah Churchill rather than her sister Sarah. I am aware that there are sources that say it was Sarah. Even though they're sisters, I'd like to have the right great-granny. I will recheck my sources but it isn't conclusive either way from what I recall.

Sarah is 14 degrees from Claude Monet, 14 degrees from Gigi Tanksley and 14 degrees from Victoria of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.

C  >  Churchill  |  B  >  Blakey  >  Sarah (Churchill) Blakey