Richard (Clark) Clarke
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Richard (Clark) Clarke

Richard Clarke formerly Clark
Born [date unknown] in Englandmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married Aug 1643 (to 1674) in Rowley, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Descendants descendants
Died before in Rowley, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Puritan Great Migration Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 17 Mar 2013
This page has been accessed 1,453 times.
The Puritan Great Migration.
Richard (Clark) Clarke migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640).
Join: Puritan Great Migration Project
Discuss: pgm

Biography

16?? -- Richard Clarke emigrated from England to Massachusetts Bay Colony.

December 1638 -- Richard Clarke was not listed on the passenger list of the ship "John of London" on which Rev. Ezekiel Rogers and his group sailed from England to Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colony. They then spent the winter at Salem. [1]

August 1643 -- Richard Clarke and Alice Unknown married at Rowley, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colony. They were the second couple married at Rowley, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colony. [2][3]

Sometime between 1643 and 1650 -- Richard Clarke bought the house lot of Thomas Elithorp on Bradford Street, Rowley, Essex County, Massachusetts Bay Colony. [4]

Richard Clarke was a town officer. [5]

1656 & 1660 -- Richard Clarke was an overseer. [6]

1666 -- Richard Clarke was a selectman. [7]

The death of neither Richard nor Alice Clarke was recorded at Rowley, but his death occurred before 22 Feb 1673 when an inventory of his estate was taken and valued at £43.3.10 less debts of 21.7.0 total 21.16.10 of March 31, 1674. His wife Alice was not mentioned, it is probable that her death preceded his.[8]

Richard Clarke's Will on file at Salem, Essex County, Massachusetts dated 7 Feb 1673 and proved 31 March 1674: "Having disposed of my children in marriage and not having much to dispose yet that all Love may be continued betwixt my son and daughter my will is that my son John Clarke shall have all my stocke in cattell horses sheepe and swine and two thirds of all my provisions and implements of husbandry he paying all my debts and funeral expeses. Itme my will further is that my daughter Esther Hobkinson shall have all my household goods (excepting the Read Ruge that is upon my bed which I give unto my son John), and the other third part of my provision and implements of husbandry. My will further is that my son John shall be the sole executor of this my last will: unto which I set my hand this 7th day of February 1673." [9][8] [10]

Children in Rowley town records:[11]

  1. Judah b. 5 4m 1644; bur 28 July 1660
  2. Hester b. 10 8m 1645; m. 11 May 1666 Jonathan Hopkinson
  3. Mary b. 22 10 m 1648; bur 14 Jun 1660
  4. John b. 26 1m 1650; m. Mary Poore
  5. Martha b. 10 1m 1656; bur 16 Jun 1660


Sources

  1. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 7 - 10.
  2. Early Settlers of Rowley, Massachusetts, page 77.
  3. Vital Records of Rowley, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849, Volume 1 (The Essex institute, 1928 - Registers of births, etcp. 270
  4. Early Settlers of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 77 & 112.
  5. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 7 - 10.
  6. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 7 - 10.
  7. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 7 - 10.
  8. 8.0 8.1 Essex County, MA: Probate File Papers, 1638-1881.Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2014. (From records supplied by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Archives.) Link at AmericanAncestors ($)
  9. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 7 - 10.
  10. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts, pages 7 - 10.
  11. Vital Records of Rowley, Massachusetts, to the End of the Year 1849 pp 48, 49; p. 453; p. 270
  • George Brainard Blodgette and Amos Everett Jewett. Early Settlers of Rowley, Massachusetts. 1933. Reprint. ed by the New England History Press, Somersworth, New Hampshire. 1981. Page 77. Also available at: [1]
  • Great Migration Newsletter, V.1-20.(Online Database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2018.) Reference Vol 18, page 19 via $American Ancestors which says that he and his wife had a prescence in the town of Rowley between 1639-1643 , and suggests that he may have been part of Rogers' company on page 29 of the same volume of the publication.
  • Thomas Bellows Peck. Richard Clarke of Rowley, Massachusetts: and his descendants in the line of Timothy Clark of Rockingham, Vermont. Boston, Massachusetts. 1905. Pages 7 - 9. Published in Vol 58 NEHGR (1904) pp 267-274 Also published under separate cover by Press of D. Clapp & son, 1905 At Google Books




Is Richard your relative? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Richard's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Clark-42288 and Clark-11473 appear to represent the same person because: merge using information on Clark-11473. Alices need merge also.
posted by Anne B
I believe this set of profiles has been misinformed by the Ancestry trees. Here's a correct profile for [[Clark-11473|Richard Clark died 1673 Rowley]. His wife was Alice Unknown not Alice Hallett. (I'm think there was an Alice Hallett, but was married to someone else) This Richard's parents are unknown. They are certainly not the Mayflower passenger All four profiles need to be disconnected and merged into appropriate profiles. Objections?
posted on Clark-42288 (merged) by Anne B
Lets remove the middle initial. Middle names were not in use at this time.
posted by Anne B