no image

Elizabeth (Clerke) Foster (abt. 1591)

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Elizabeth Foster formerly Clerke
Born about in East Farliegh, Kent, Englandmap
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 5 Feb 1607 in East Farleigh, Kent, Englandmap
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Profile last modified 12 Aug 2017 | Created 10 Dec 2012
This page has been accessed 289 times.

Biography

Elizabeth married Richard Foster 5 Feb 1607 in East Farleigh, Kent, England. [1]

Sources

  1. "England Marriages, 1538–1973 ," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NLQ4-7BC : 10 December 2014), Richard Foster and Elizabeth Clarke, 05 Feb 1607; citing East Farleigh,Kent,England, reference , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 0845114 IT 1.


More Genealogy Tools



Sponsored Search




Is Elizabeth your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Elizabeth's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.

Login to post a comment.

On 5 Apr 2016 at 13:40 GMT Jayme (Mullins) Arrington wrote:

There are posts on both pages that are several months to several years old--I am going to detach this Elizabeth as a daughter of Clerke-22 and Saxby-9

On 4 Jul 2014 at 22:45 GMT Vic Watt wrote:

I can find no support for James and Mary having a second daughter Elizabeth, or a daughter who married a Richard Foster. SEE: The New England Historical and Genealogical Register. (NEHGR) Boston, MA: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 1847-. NEHGR 74(April 1920):131

https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id-AEOby-E5U0C&rdidbook--AEOby-E5U0C&rdot=1

On 17 May 2014 at 18:32 GMT Sandy Culver wrote:

Clerke-99 and Clerke-131 appear to represent the same person because: they have same parents and aligned data.

C  >  Clerke  |  F  >  Foster  >  Elizabeth (Clerke) Foster