He married (1) Princess Betsy Coqua Bell.He married (2) Annie Ratliff on 1780 in Franklin Co., TN.
John COKER was born about 1765 in Laurens Co., SC. He appeared on the census in 1800 in Laurens Co., SC. His wife is listed as Nancy. He appeared on the census in 1810 in Laurens Co., SC. Listed with Dicy. He died on 26 Jul 1847. (68) He was married to Dicey/Nancy DIAL? before 1789.
Children of John Coker and Princess Betsy Coqua Bell are:
John Coker, b. May 10, 1789, Laurens Co., Sc, d. November 1851, San Antonio, TX.
James Coker, b. 1797, Laurens Co., Sc, d. 1879, Cherokee Co., TX.
Joseph Coker, b. August 14, 1798, Lawrence Co., SC, d. March 10, 1881, San Antonio, TX.
William Coker, b. 1794, d. date unknown.
Sources
Father Joseph Coker's Will Referring by name to John (as youngest son), mother and most male siblings and dated 7 Mar 1792. Estate records and wills, 1788-1912: "South Carolina Probate Re... Bound Volumes, 1671-1977" Catalog: Estate records and wills, 1788-1912 Wills, v. Al 1788-1802 Wills, v. B1 1803-1823 Wills, v. C1-D1 1802-1819 Image path: South Carolina Probate Records, Bound Volumes, 1671-1977 > Laurens > Wills, 1788-1802, Vol. A1 > image 226 of 354; citing Department of Archives and History, Columbia. FamilySearch Image: 939L-JD3Z-LB (accessed 25 March 2023)
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:
Coker-3212 and Coker-678 appear to represent the same person because: I created Coker-3212 because I found conflicting info. My Bad. I should have dug deeper and I would have realized that Coker-678 was the better profile.
I recommend merging these to get rid of the Coker 3212 as its not needed and could cause confusion.
I recommend merging these to get rid of the Coker 3212 as its not needed and could cause confusion.