no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Jean Colart (1635)

Jean Colart
Born in Francemap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Hope Ryan private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Apr 2010
This page has been accessed 803 times.

When this person was created on 14 April 2010 through the import of Jamie 2010_2010-04-10.ged, certain information could not be interpreted. Could you help clean this up?

EVEN

EVEN
TYPE Record Change
DATE 26 FEB 2007

Did not import EVEN.





Is Jean your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Jean's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Dear Paul and other/future profile managers or living relations:

1) What primary sources evidences this person ever existed, and is genealogically certain to be the father of the connected Francoise Collard?

2) If the family descendants are in La Rochelle --> Acadia (Canada) why is he married to a... Belgian? Why do they christen their daughter with a homonym LNAB instead of just keeping Colart?

3) Who is responsible for " Jamie 2010_2010-04-10.ged" and are they active here on WikiTree today?

Observation: This feels like GED dross and a robo-merge. It should be either proven, and sourced; or the connections removed, and bio purged of all non-genealogy (or perhaps entire profile deleted).

Thoughts?

posted by Isaac Taylor
This notional family group Colart m. van Bellinghen is spammed on Ancestry.com as a robosuggestion totally devoid of actual sources. It's just being webcrawled on random websites, apparently. We should aim higher and not contribute to the vicious cycle of self-perpetuating unsourced internet jibjab.
posted by Isaac Taylor
I agree with all your points. If I had a wishlist, it would be that some arborist take a look at all profiles from before 2013 with managers that are no longer active/or only made a few profiles/or downloaded GED with no further work.
posted by Nina Pyne

C  >  Colart  >  Jean Colart