no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Cornell) Briggs (abt. 1621 - abt. 1661)

Sarah Briggs formerly Cornell
Born about in Englandmap [uncertain]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married about 1641 in Rhode Islandmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 40 in Newport, Rhode Islandmap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 13 Dec 2010
This page has been accessed 3,552 times.

Contents

Disputed Origins

Sarah Cornell has been shown as the child of George Cornell and his wife Susan (Casse) Cornell. However, they both died well before Sarah's birth, 1616 and 1567, respectively. Due to this, they have been removed from her profile as parents.

There was also speculation that Sarah Cornell was the daughter of Thomas Cornell and Rebecca Briggs. The Saffron Walden, county Essex, parish register contains the following entry: Sarah, daughter of Thomas and Rebecca Cornell, baptized 30 Mar 1623.[1] The Sarah who was daughter of Thomas Cornell, according to the original Austin's Genealogical Dictionary of Rhode Island, married Thomas Willett in 1643, and Charles Bridges in 1647.[2] Torrey and other sources report a Sarah Cornell marrying (1) Thomas Willett in 1643, (2) Charles Bridges in 1647, and (3) John Lawrence in 1682.[3]

According to the New York Genealogical and Biographical Record,

"It is stated in the record of the proceedings in the suit of Charles Bridges and Sarah, his wife, plaintiffs, against Thomas Pell, defendant, before the court of Assize, September 29, 1665, that Thomas Cornell left a will appointing his widow his executrix, and that by virtue of her authority as such executrix, she sold and conveyed to their two daughters, of whom the plaintiff, Sarah Bridges, was one, and Rebecca Woolsey, wife of George Woolsey, was the other, the lands known as Cornell's Neck, Westchester County."[4]

NOTE: This serves to show that the Sarah Cornell of this profile cannot be the same Sarah Cornell as was the daughter of Thomas Cornell.

Sarah Cornell is the Sarah who was the daughter of Thomas Cornell. Her profile is well sourced.

Biography

Sarah Cornell(?) was born in in about 1621, estimating based on her having children starting in 1642.

John Briggs married Sarah Cornell "sister of Thomas" according to this source: [5]

A Sarah Cornell MAY have been the first wife of John Briggs, married before 1642 in Newport or Portsmouth, Rhode Island. The entry in Torrey reads "BRIGGS, John (1609-1690) & 1wf ________/?Sarah Cornell? by 1642 Newport/Warwick, RI/Portsmouth, RI"[6]

Sarah (Cornell?) Briggs died, presumably, by 1662 when John Briggs married a possible second wife, Constant (Mitchell) Forbes (wife of John Forbes).[6]

In conclusion, there is very little source data to support Sarah's supposed last name at birth of Cornell.

Sources

  1. Moriarity, G. Andrews "Additions and Corrections to Austin's Genealogical Dictionary of Rhode Island" The American Genealogist 35:107. New Haven, CT: D. L. Jacobus, 1937-. (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2009 - .)
  2. Austin, John Osborne The Genealogical Dictionary of Rhode Island: Comprising Three Generations of Settlers who Came Before 1690 (with Many Families Carried to the Fourth Generation), published 1887. Reference page 55
  3. Torrey's New England Marriages prior to 1700, (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015. Reference page 1676
  4. New York Genealogical and Biographical Record 10:181. New York, NY: New York Genealogical and Biographical Society, 1870-. (Online database: AmericanAncestors.org, New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2011.)
  5. Wilbour, Benjamin Franklin. Little Compton Families (Genealogical Publishing Co., 1997, 1998, 2000, 2003) Vol. 1, Page 57
  6. 6.0 6.1 Torrey's New England Marriages Prior to 1700, (Online database. AmericanAncestors.org. New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2008.) Originally published as: New England Marriages Prior to 1700. Boston, Mass.: New England Historic Genealogical Society, 2015. Reference page 204

Acknowledgments

  • Thanks to Lynden Rodriguez for starting this profile. Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by Lynden and others.




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Sarah's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 9

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I agree with Daphne.
posted by Bill Catambay
Cornell-67 and Cornell-2416 appear to represent the same person because: There is not enough information on one to contradict the information on the other. They need merged.
posted by Orinda (Hamon) Spence
The issue comes down to John Briggs calling Rebecca Cornell his "sister Cornell" via dream. Some interpret that to mean that she was his sister (in law) by virtue of his marriage to her sister Sarah. I don't think there's enough evidence to support that said Sarah was a Cornell nor the sister of Rebecca:

If his testimony put Rebecca's son to death (which it did), then it's less likely that said son was his wife's nephew (his wife would probably not have liked having her husband send her nephew to his death).

Thus, I believe we should remove the "Cornell" origins from her profile with appropriate explanations.

It is far more likely that John was really Rebecca's blood brother, and she of maiden name Briggs. John's wife Sarah, this profile, has unknown origins as far as I can tell.

Both couples are my ancestors, so I'd really like to get this cleaned up!

edit: I mixed up the relationships. earlier

posted by Daphne Maddox
Cornell-2277 and Cornell-67 appear to represent the same person because: Same vitals. Same spouse. Detach any parents in resulting merged profile. They have not been proved.
posted by Jillaine Smith
What sources support her origins? Without any sources to support her origins, she should be detached from ANY parents; her birth year should be estimated based on her (estimated ?) marriage to John Briggs.
posted by Jillaine Smith
I think we need some leadership to jump in here and help sort this out. It's not just because of one postponement, but an ongoing circumstance of debates over dates/locations where the assertions of those events are not backed by reliable sources. It may be time to remove all assertions from the Briggs/Cornell profiles which are not supported certainly by evidence and then see how many assertions remain which are contradictory. (Removing said assertions would also be consistent with our pledge.) Cornell-2277, for instance, has zero reliable sources, and yet her asserted birth date is preventing a merge.
posted by Daphne Maddox
Cornell-2277 and Cornell-67 are not ready to be merged because: Birth dates are too far apart in years. Waiting for more information.
posted by Orinda (Hamon) Spence
Cornell-2277 and Cornell-67 appear to represent the same person because: they are duplicates of duplicate husband and duplicate children
posted by Daphne Maddox

C  >  Cornell  |  B  >  Briggs  >  Sarah (Cornell) Briggs