no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hugh Craig (1858)

Hugh Craig
Born in Glasgow, Scotlandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1885 [location unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Darin Craig private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 12 Nov 2008
This page has been accessed 914 times.

Biography

Hugh Craig was born in Glasgow. He was the son of George and Isabella Craig.

At the time of the 1861 Census, he was 3 and living with his parents and siblings at 183 Stirlings Road in Glasgow.

Sources

  • "Scotland, Births and Baptisms, 1564-1950," index, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/FQFM-YCS : accessed 28 Aug 2012), George Craig in entry for Hugh Craig, 30 Mar 1858; citing reference , FHL microfilm 6035516.
  • 1861 Scotland Census - Source Citation: Parish: Glasgow Inner High; ED: 83; Page: 7; Line: 22; Roll: CSSCT1861_97. Source Information: Ancestry.com. 1861 Scotland Census [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2006. Original data: Scotland. 1861 Scotland Census. Reels 1-150. General Register Office for Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland.




Is Hugh your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hugh by comparing test results with other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hugh:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 1

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Buck-903 and Craig-4 do not represent the same person because: No way.
posted by Anonymous Schubert

C  >  Craig  >  Hugh Craig