no image

Ann (Dixon) Cox (1781 - 1844)

Privacy Level: Open (White)
Ann Cox formerly Dixon
Born in Chatham, North Carolina, United Statesmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married in Ross County, Ohio United Statesmap
Died in Wyoming, Stark, Illinois, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 3 Feb 2014
This page has been accessed 125 times.

Biography

Ann was born in 1781. She was the daughter of Jesse Dixon and Lydia Winters. She passed away in 1844.[1] [2]

Daughter of Jesse & Lydia Dixon, wife of Nathan W. Cox, m. Nov 10, 1806, Ross County.

Spouse:

  • Nathan W Cox (1785 - 1840)*

Children:

  • Enoch Cox (1807 - 1887)*
  • Joseph Harvey Cox (1814 - 1897)*
  • Nancy Ann Cox Graves (1826 - 1898)*

Disputed Info

Ann was born about 1786. Ann is the child of Jesse Dixon and Lydia Winters. [3]

Sources

  1. Pusey: Descendants of Jesse Dixon and Lydia Winters
  2. FindAGrave
  3. First-hand information as remembered by Kathy Stewart, Sunday, February 2, 2014. Replace this citation if there is another source.

See also:

  • Add sources here.
  • Ann Dixon Cox
  • Birth 7 Dec 1781 Chatham County, North Carolina, USA
  • Death 28 Jun 1844 (aged 62) Wyoming, Stark County, Illinois, USA
  • Find A Grave: Memorial #31176994
  • Burial: Sheets Cemetery - Stark County Illinois
  • Photo: Has a photo of gravestone on gravesite
  • Inscription: Aged 62 y. 6 m. 21 d.


More Genealogy Tools



Sponsored by MyHeritage




Search
Searching for someone else?
First: Last:

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ann by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share DNA with Ann:

Have you taken a DNA test for genealogy? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Collaboration
  • Login to edit this profile.
  • Private Messages: Contact the Profile Managers privately: David Dixon and Kathy King. (Best when privacy is an issue.)
  • Public Comments: Login to post. (Best for messages specifically directed to those editing this profile. Limit 20 per day.)
  • Public Q&A: These will appear above and in the Genealogist-to-Genealogist (G2G) Forum. (Best for anything directed to the wider genealogy community.)

On 5 Jul 2018 at 14:06 GMT Glenn Dixon wrote:

Dixon-6190 and Dixon-3537 appear to represent the same person because: Looks like we have a couple of merges to do here. I have a lot of connections to Ann's Dixon side of the family, you have a lot of connection to Nathan's Cox side. I just started working on Nathan today, but had bad death date so it didn't trigger a match.

any way, let's start with Ann - Please approve so I can do the merge, or you can do it yourself, either way. Thanks!

On 3 May 2018 at 23:24 GMT Jo Gill wrote:

Dixon-7486 and Dixon-3537 appear to represent the same person because: same parents, same siblings



Ann is 15 degrees from SJ Baty, 18 degrees from Orville Redenbacher and 17 degrees from Victoria of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.

D  >  Dixon  |  C  >  Cox  >  Ann (Dixon) Cox