no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Eggleston) Bliss (1683 - aft. 1742)

Sarah Bliss formerly Eggleston
Born in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 7 Mar 1702 in Enfield, Hartford, Connecticutmap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 58 in Windsor, Hartford, Connecticutmap
Profile last modified | Created 20 Jun 2011
This page has been accessed 493 times.

Contents

Biography

Sarah Eggleston, the daughter of Benjamin Eggleston and Hannah Osborn, was born April 20/1683 at Windsor.[1]

According to Ricker Sarah Eggleston married Jonathan Bliss on March 17, 1702, in Enfield. On January 12, 1708/9 Sarah Eggleston married Jonathan Stiles in Windsor. Were these two different women?

Birth

Date: 20 APR 1683
Place: Enfield, Hartford, Connecticut, USA

Death

Date: 1702

No more info is currently available. Can you add to this biography?

Sources

  1. Jacquelyn Ladd Ricker, “Ricker Compilation of Vital Records of Early Connecticut”, Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc., 2006, page 4384.

See also:

  • Savage New England Register, vol. 2.
  • "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch [1] : (11 February 2018), Sarah Egelston, 20 Apr 1683; citing; FHL microfilm unknown.
  • WikiTree profile Eggleston-90 created through the import of Hummel Bigelow Roots.ged on Jul 8, 2011 by Gail Hummel. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Gail and others.




Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Eggleston-90 and Eggleston-86 appear to represent the same person because: From the limited info in Eggleston-90 (namely dob & husband), these seem to represent the same person.
posted by Don Osborn
Did anybody notice that according to bio she died in 1689, but got married in 1702? I changed it to reflect the date of husband's will. Eggleston seems to have been a popular name.
posted by Sheri Havens
Eggleston-86 and Eggleston-717 appear to represent the same person because: clear duplicates
posted by Stephanie Stults
Eggleston-317 and Eggleston-86 appear to represent the same person because: clear duplicates
posted by Stephanie Stults

E  >  Eggleston  |  B  >  Bliss  >  Sarah (Eggleston) Bliss