no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Narcissa Leigh (Farris) Logan (1818 - 1900)

Narcissa Leigh Logan formerly Farris
Born in Knox, Kentucky, United Statesmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 22 Jun 1840 in Knox, Kentucky, United Statesmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 82 in Pine Mountain, Whitley, Kentucky, United Statesmap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Ken Parman private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 9 Dec 2014
This page has been accessed 247 times.

Biography

Wife of William Ward Logan, married in Knox County on 22 Jun 1840. Appears to have died sometime after the 1880 census.

Sources

  • 1880 US Fed Census living in the home of her married daughter Emily Logan Golden.
  • Unclassified: "Kentucky, U.S., Birth Records, 1847-1911". Ancestry Sharing Link Ancestry Record 1213 #300044699 (accessed 1 October 2021). Name: Narcissa Faris; Gender: Female; Spouse: William Logen; Child: John W Logen.




Is Narcissa your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Narcissa by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Narcissa:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Farris-765 and Farris-616 appear to represent the same person because: These are the same person. The later profile contained errors and had no sources. I would like to see this merge completed so that I can add her husband and children. I removed the erroneously added spouse who was actually her brother in law.
posted by Liane Smith
Agree these are most likely the same person.
posted by Ken Parman
Farris-765 and Farris-616 are not ready to be merged because: Not enough information on Farris-765 to make a decision without some research.
posted by Ken Parman
Farris-765 and Farris-616 appear to represent the same person because: Please review these potential duplicates

Thank you.

posted by Philip Smith

F  >  Farris  |  L  >  Logan  >  Narcissa Leigh (Farris) Logan