no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Finley (abt. 1745 - 1830)

James Finley
Born about in Tinkling Springs, Augusta County, Colony of Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1775 in Augusta, Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 85 in Tyes Ferry, Whitley, Kentucky, United Statesmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: James McGehee private message [send private message] and Paul Kerbow private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 30 Dec 2013
This page has been accessed 600 times.

Contents

Biography

He is the son of James Finley and Agnes Reid. [1]

James was born on 8 May 1745 in Tinkling Springs, Augusta County, VA, American Colonies. He was the son of James Finley Jr.[2][3][4]

James served in the military on 5 August 1777 in Virginia, USA.[5]

In 1820 James (age about 74) was living in Whitley, Kentucky, United States.[6]

In 1830 James (age about 84) was living in Whitley, Kentucky, USA.[7]

James Finley: 14 December 1830 in Rockholds, Whitley County, Kentucky, USA.

James died at the age of 85 on 14 December 1830 in Tyes Ferry, Whitley, Kentucky, United States.

James was buried after 14 December 1830 in Rockholds, Whitley County, Kentucky, United States of America.

External media links: (These may require a subscription to view)

  • James & Keziah Martin Finley Headstone 1 (jpg file): Media
  • James and Keziah Martin Finley (jpg file): Media
  • Finley, James and Kesiah Martin (jpg file): Media
  • James Finley (jpg file): Media

Research Notes

Issues to be checked

  • Find A Grave source was linked to an incorrect James Finley and has been deleted. Sources will be replaced pending further research.

Generated by WikiTree AGC. This section should be removed when all issues have been looked at.

  • A burial fact had no date. Changed its date to be after the death date.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1583600910'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1580973123'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1584823822'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1580855502'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1580855508'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1580876988'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1581305869'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.
  • There is no source with source id 'S1581810190'. GEDCOMPare typically does this when there is a source which is a record for a different person (such as the spouse). The ref is still added but is missing the source repository data.

Sources

  1. Entered by Sir William Arbuthnot, Monday, December 30, 2013.
  2. Birth: Missing source ID S1583600910. Citing: Source number: 1247.021; Source type: Family group sheet, FGSE, listed as parents; Number of Pages: 1 Ancestry Record 7836 #409178 (accessed 7 June 2021)
  3. Birth: Missing source ID S1580973123. Citing: Ancestry Record 5769 #1529559 (accessed 7 June 2021)
  4. Birth: Missing source ID S1583600910. Citing: Source number: 8145.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: JJ2 Ancestry Record 7836 #409177 (accessed 7 June 2021)
  5. Military: Missing source ID S1584823822. Citing: Ancestry Record 4282 #1799963 (accessed 7 June 2021)
  6. Residence: Missing source ID S1580855502. Citing: 1820 U S Census; Census Place: Whitley, Kentucky; Page: 116; NARA Roll: M33_28; Image: 131 Ancestry Record 7734 #1402936 (accessed 7 June 2021)
  7. Residence: Missing source ID S1580855508. Citing: 1830; Census Place: Whitley, Kentucky; Series: M19; Roll: 42; Page: 270; Family History Library Film: 0007821 Ancestry Record 8058 #1106338 (accessed 7 June 2021)
See also:

Acknowledgments

Thank you to Sir William Arbuthnot for creating Finley-729 on 30 Dec 13. Click the Changes tab for the details on contributions by Sir William and others.






Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree: It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with James:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
See Finley-691 - some of the text in this profile mentions a Keziah - that James (Finley-691) married Keziah Martin. The James who married Keziah and the James who married Mary Henderson are two different people.

edit - corrected WikiTree ID - I meant Finley-691. Sorry for any confusion.

posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
edited by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Finley-3509 and Finley-729 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, same spouse, similar birth and death dates.
posted by Paul Kerbow
Hi Megan,

I'm not sure what you are asking. Please elaborate.

posted on Finely-19 (merged) by James McGehee
Hi there, this profile is Finley-19 and the one for his son is Finley-2037 so there's obviously an issue in carrying the line through. What's going on here? Do you need more proof of paperwork or what? Thanks!
posted on Finely-19 (merged) by [Living Finley]

F  >  Finley  >  James Finley