Died
at about age 95
in Mystic, Stonington, New London, Connecticut, United States
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified
| Created 21 Oct 2010
This page has been accessed 299 times.
Biography
Mary Esther Fish, born 12 Aug 1868 at Mystic, Connecticut, was the first child of Asa Fish (1844-1907) with Joanna (Brown) (1846-1925)[1],[2]. Mary was counted with her birth family during her childhood in New London and Stonington, Connecticut [3],[4].
She married Jan 30, 1895 Edwin B. Horton (17 Oct 1870 - 9 Jan 1927 [5]) of Attleboro, Massachusetts. The following children of this family are documented:
Dean Harris Horton (18 November 1895 [6] – March 1975)
Lydia Leming Horton (13 July 1900 – 26 July 1986); married George J. Truss
Alice Bradwell Horton (21 September 1902 [8] – 1 January 1984); married George Banks
Charles Douglass Horton (28 May 1906 – 12 September 1978); married Bertha L. Anderson
Mary Esther Horton (26 December 1908 – 8 February 1988); married Raymond Brooks
Henry Irving Horton (29 September 1913 – 11 March 1995)
This family was counted in the 1900 census record of Washington, DC [9]. By 1905 they were in Pawtucket, Rhode Island [10], then in 1910 in Providence [11], then back to New London [12]. Mary had been widowed by 1927, thereafter returned to residence in Stonington [13],[14]
Mary Esther (Fish) Horton died in 1964. Her grave is in Elm Grove Cemetery, Mystic, New London County, Connecticut, USA [15].
Notes
Reason behind their frequent relocations probably related to military or naval food supply service. In the 1900 census the occupation of Edwin Horton was 'provisions'. Subsequent records state butcher, butcher's market.
Edwin's middle name may have been Beniah, Bernan, Upward trace on his ancestry probably would lead to Pearline Ann (Corbin) & Beniah A. Horton as his grandparents.
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her ancestors' mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary: