She appears on the 1841 census with her parents, living in Maitland Street, Bothkennar, aged 15.[1]
On 14 November 1851 in Bothkennar[2] (Fisher home parish), and on 16 November 1851 in Airth[3] (Wright home parish), she married Robert Wright. Apparently it was quite normal to celebrate the marriage in the parish of each person.
Along with her husband, she arrived in Victoria, Australia in May 1852 on Success.[4]
She passed away in 1886, aged 60, and is buried in the Old Ballarat Cemetery.[5][6]
↑ "Scotland Marriages, 1561-1910," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XY7W-FXQ : 10 February 2018), Robert Wright and Margaret Fisher, 14 Nov 1851; citing Bothkennar,Stirling,Scotland, index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 1,041,972.
↑ "Scotland Marriages, 1561-1910," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:XY77-68N : 10 February 2018), Robert Wright and Margaret Fisher, 16 Nov 1851; citing Airth,Stirling,Scotland, index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 1,040,328.
↑ Ballarat Cemeteries record search, https://web.ballaratcemeteries.com.au/Deceasedsearch/DeceasedSearch.aspx# Last Name: Wright Given Name: Margaret Cemetery: Ballarat Cemetery Old Location: CN, Section 11, Grave 08 Date of Burial: 23 Apr 1886 Age at death: 50 years (although I believe this to be an error and should be 60 years.)
Victorian Edwardian Index 1902-1913
Is Margaret your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Margaret by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Margaret:
Fisher-16574 and Fisher-14240 appear to represent the same person because: I do not know what details are given in the Victorian Edwardian Index 1902-1913. Apart from the discrepancy in birth date (neither of which have a definite source) and very little other detail, the spouse the daughter are probably the same.