John Fitz Alan, otherwise d'Arundel,[1] Knt., 2nd Lord Arundel, "of Buckland, Colley (in Reigate), and West Betchworth (in Dorking), Surrey, Chancton (in Washington), Cudlow, and Todham, Sussex, etc."[2],[3]
Mother: Eleanor, younger daughter of John Mautravers, Knt., and his wife Gwenthlian, was "born about 1345 (aged 5 in 1350 and 19 in 1364)." Eleanor married (2) Robert Cobham, Knt., 9 August 1380. She died 12 January 1404/5.
John Arundel, K.B., Lord Arundel and Mautravers (born 1 August 1385, died 21 April 1421), was contracted to marry Elizabeth Talbot (they received dispensation to remain in the unconsummated marriage in 1405). He married Eleanor Berkeley before 1407.[8][9]
Thomas Arundel, Knt., 3rd son, married Joan, daughter of Henry Moyne. Thomas "died overseas about 1430-1"; his widow married John Burden, Esq.[10]
John was with the army in Scotland in 1383 and with the English Fleet in 1388, "under his uncle, Richard de Arundel, Earl of Arundel, Admiral of Engand, in Earl Richard's successful operations against the western coast of France."[4]
Sir John, 2nd Lord Arundel died on 14 August 1390[11] and was buried at Missenden Abbey, Buckinghamshire. Elizabeth le Despenser, who had survived her second husband, William le Zouche, "died 10 (or 11) April 1408. She left a will dated 4 April 1408, requesting burial at Tewkesbury Abbey, Gloucestershire, near her brothers."[3]
Research Notes
FitzAlan or Arundel?
Cokayne's The Complete Peerage calls him "John Fitz Alan, other-wise d'Arundel".[1] His father's IPM includes only de Arundel[5] (no Fitz Alan); in his own IPM, he is "de Arundell".[11]
Richardson notes that the family dropped the use of "Fitz Alan" as a surname completely after the death of Earl Richard in 1302 (see Earl Richard's profile).[12]
Lord, not Earl
This John de Arundel is called by Richardson the 2nd Lord Arundel.[4] Cokayne does not assign him any title, calling him "John Fitz Alan, otherwise d'Arundel," although Cokayne shows John's father as "John, Lord Arundel, sum. to Parl. as such 1377-79"[1] (i.e., 1st Lord Arundel).
This John's son John, K.B., "was heir male of his cousin, Thomas Arundel, K.G., K.B., Earl of Arundel and Surrey,... by which he inherited the earldoms of Arundel and Surrey" in 1415.[8] Cokayne numbers "John d'Arundel" (born 1 Aug. 1385), K.B., as the 13th or 6th Earl of Arundel,[9]Thomas (1381-1415) as 12th or 5th Earl of Arundel (1400), and Thomas's father, Richard, as the 11th or 4th Earl of Arundel (1376).[13]
Wikipedia calls this John, his father & his son, "Baron Arundel" (2nd, 1st, and 3rd, respectively).[14] Wikipedia also calls this John "2nd Baron Maltravers jure matris''. Richardson does not refer to this John ([FitzAlan-600]) as Lord of Maltravers, or Baron Maltravers, in either Magna Carta Ancestry or Royal Ancestry. In both works, Richardson's entry for son John (b 1385) starts with "de jure Lord of Maltravers" and ends with Lord of Arundel and Maltravers. That John's son John is also Lord of Arundel and Maltravers. (See Magna Carta Ancestry,I:32-35 ARUNDEL 9, 10, 10.i.)
Locations from an unsourced biography - born at Arundel, Sussex, died at Stoke - remain in the datafields, but the marriage location of "Groby, Leicestershire" (from an unsourced biography on his wife's profile, 26 March 2020) was deleted.
John's mother, Eleanor, née Mautravers, was a descendant of Saher de Quincy,[15] one of barons who had stood surety for Magna Carta in 1215.[16] See below for the status of John's WikiTree connections to surety barons.
Sources
↑ 1.01.11.2 G. E. Cokayne, ed. V. Gibbs. The Complete Peerage, volume 1 (1910), page 253; online at Family Search (sign-in required): page 253 (292 of 537), accessed 26 March 2020.
↑ Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City: the author, 2013), volume II, pages 596-618 FITZ ALAN.
↑ 3.03.13.2 Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), volume I, pages 32-33 ARUNDEL 9.
↑ 4.04.14.24.3 Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry (2013), I:151-152 ARUNDEL 10.
↑ 5.05.15.25.3 M. C. B. Dawes, A. C. Wood and D. H. Gifford. "Inquisitions Post Mortem, Richard II, File 8," in Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 15, Richard II, (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1970), 77-93. British History Online, accessed March 25, 2020, http://www.british-history.ac.uk/inquis-post-mortem/vol15/pp77-93.
↑ Douglas Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry (2011), I:30-32 ARUNDEL 8.
↑ Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry (2013), II:451-453 DESPENSER 13.
↑ 8.08.1 Douglas Richardson, Magna Carta Ancestry (2011), I:33-36 ARUNDEL 10.
↑ 9.09.1 Cokayne, The Complete Peerage, volume 1 (1910), page 247; online at FamilySearch (sign-in required): page 247 (286 of 537), accessed 24 March 2020.
↑ Douglas Richardson, Royal Ancestry (2013), I:580 BROWNE 11.
↑ 11.011.1 M. C. B. Dawes, M. R. Devine, H. E. Jones and M. J. Post. "Inquisitions Post Mortem, Richard II, File 65," in Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem: Volume 16, Richard II, (London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1974), 377-389. British History Online, accessed March 25, 2020, http://www.british-history.ac.uk/inquis-post-mortem/vol16/pp377-389.
↑Earl Richard's profile, accessed 26 March 2020, includes more information than excerpted here from footnote 25 in Douglas Richardson's Royal Ancestry, II:599-600 FITZ ALAN 9, the entry for "Richard Fitz Alan (or de Arundel), Knt., 8th Earl of Arundel," which says in part that he (the 8th Earl), "his father and grandfather all employed the surname Fitz Alan.... Following Earl Richard's death in 1302, the family dropped [Fitz Alan]. Last known use of Fitz Alan by any member of this family dates c. 1312-3... Thereafter, all further references to this family employ the surname Arundel [or de Arundel ] to the complete exclusion of the surname Fitz Alan."
Note that the last statement refers to further references in Richardson's Royal Ancestry.
↑ Cokayne, The Complete Peerage (1910), online at Family Search (sign-in required): pages 244-246 (283-285 of 537) (accessed 26 March 2020).
Cokayne, G.E., Gibbs, V., ed. The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom (The St. Catherine Press, London, 1910-). See also WikiTree's source page for Complete Peerage.
Richardson, Douglas. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham. 2nd edition. Salt Lake City: the author, 2011. See also WikiTree's source page for Magna Carta Ancestry.
Richardson, Douglas. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham. Salt Lake City: the author, 2013. See also WikiTree's source page for Royal Ancestry.
Benolte, Thomas; Philipot, John; & Owen, George. The Visitations of the County of Sussex: 1530 and 1633-4. London: The Harleian Society, 1905. Vol LIII, p 83.
Acknowledgements
See the Changes tab for details of edits to this profile. Thanks to everyone who contributed.
Magna Carta Project
This profile was reviewed/approved for the project in March 2020. ~ Noland-165 26 March 2020.
Nelson Gateways (John and Margaret) (MCA III:225-230 NELSON). See the trails HERE.
See Base Camp for information about Magna Carta trails. See the project's glossary for project-specific terms, such as a "badged trail".
Additional Gateway Ancestors descended from John de Arundel and his wife Elizabeth le Despenser are also documented by Richardson (see Magna Carta Ancestry, footnote 38, II:76 DESPENSER 8.ii; the same Gateways are listed for his son Thomas, at footnote 37).
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Basil Stewart :
AncestryDNA Paternal Lineage (discontinued) 47 markers, haplogroup R1b, Ancestry member BasilStewart, MitoYDNA ID A10718[compare]
I've finished updating the profile. Only question is one that's for those more acquainted with English nobility than I am: Should his "last name at birth" be changed?
Thanks Liz. In terms of his 'last name at birth' there was a discussion on the soc-genealogy-medieval discussion group about Richardson's proposal that the family dropped the use of FitzAlan. I can't quite remember if others provided examples where they did use the name FitzAlan, but there definitely wasn't complete agreement (which isn't unusual on that site). Might have to see if I can find the discussion again.
Thanks John. I put the basics from Royal Ancestry in the Research Notes section. The profiles for Earl Richard (d 1302) and his son quote more of the footnote I quoted from here.
The Magna Carta Project recently was added as a manager, as the profile is in a trail that was developed for the project several years ago (before projects had the ability to be profile managers).
I will be using the Magna Carta project's checklist to review and update this profile, to include addressing the database errors.
If anyone has information or is familiar with additional sources that should be added, please contact me or post a comment to the profile.
Thanks Liz, in terms of sources, it looks like this is actually sourced from Marlyn Lewis' website, even though it's not actually cited, so trying to check the appropriate Richardson volumes and The Complete Peerage might be the first step?
Given we have a precise birth and death date for John FitzAlan it probably means there are primary sources that confirm those dates. Probably an inquistion post mortem to prove he was 21 if he inherited as a minor would give his birth date, and an ipm after he died that date. I can have a look later today, if no one can do this in the meantime.
yup. checking/replacing the "via Lewis" citations of Richardson is why it's in the Magna Carta Project "Needs Source Check" category! Doing that will go a long way toward improving this profile, so it's first on my list. FamilySearch still crashes my computer, so I'll check CP after that. If you could look for an IPM, that'd be great!
In the five pages that Douglas Richardson devotes to Richard Arundel, his wives and children, I can find no hint of any unknown daughters. Richard was one of the most powerful men in the kingdom, and his wives were the daughters of equally powerful men. Why would he have unknown offspring?
There is no source for this profile, and if proof cannot be shown for the existence of this unknown daughter, the profile should be removed. There is no spouse and no descendants, so this would have virtually zero impact on the tree.
edited by John Atkinson
I will be using the Magna Carta project's checklist to review and update this profile, to include addressing the database errors.
If anyone has information or is familiar with additional sources that should be added, please contact me or post a comment to the profile.
Thanks! Liz
Given we have a precise birth and death date for John FitzAlan it probably means there are primary sources that confirm those dates. Probably an inquistion post mortem to prove he was 21 if he inherited as a minor would give his birth date, and an ipm after he died that date. I can have a look later today, if no one can do this in the meantime.
There is no source for this profile, and if proof cannot be shown for the existence of this unknown daughter, the profile should be removed. There is no spouse and no descendants, so this would have virtually zero impact on the tree.
Please respond and help us improve WikiTree.
Thank you,
April Dauenhauer
Source: