Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:
I think the either the parents are wrong on here or the find a grave is wrong. The find a grave is also on Folsom-216, which has the same spouse as find a grave. This bio refers to a different spouse, and the birth/death dates are different from the find a grave attached.
Got it. So it looks like the find a grave attached here is for his brother (Folsom-216), the last son of Deacon John and Abigail. He is in that book source on pg 24, just before No. 4. If I am right, then the find a grave should be removed from this profile. Please check the book and decide. Thank you!
I think the either the parents are wrong on here or the find a grave is wrong. The find a grave is also on Folsom-216, which has the same spouse as find a grave. This bio refers to a different spouse, and the birth/death dates are different from the find a grave attached.
https://books.google.com/books?id=x-dCdmnX6FcC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30&dq=josiah+folsom+sarah+bradley&source=bl&ots=aNWwlHGwiE&sig=ACfU3U3tY-w4RFXtoDIeQ_khIur0yvtRkQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiY77n3nKDpAhXTbc0KHauLBC4Q6AEwB3oECBAQAQ#v=snippet&q=No.%209%20Jn.&f=false
the bio is correct, so it must be FAG that's wrong