Edward Foster migrated to New England during the Puritan Great Migration (1621-1640). (See Great Migration Begins, by R. C. Anderson, Vol. 1, p. 690) Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: pgm
Edward Foster's parentage and origin are unknown. Anderson states that his origin is unknown and does not discuss his parentage.[1] Based on the date of his marriage (1635), he was probably born sometime in 1606-1614, presumably in England. Based on his date of marriage, Anderson states that Edward was probably born about 1610.[1]
Cutter states that Edward was the son of a man named Timothy Foster and born in Kent, England;[2] however, no evidence was provided for either part of that assertion and none has been found. A search on familysearch.org and ancestry.com finds no birth or baptismal records for either an Edward Foster, son of Timothy Foster, born in England in 1600-1615 or an Edward Foster born in Kent, England in 1600-15. In the absence of reasonable corroborative evidence, Cutter's assertions that Edward was the son of a Timothy Foster and his assertion that Edward was born in Kent must be viewed as unsupported. (Cutter also states that Elgin (Hatherly) Hanford married Timothy Foster, and was Edward's step-mother, which is almost certainly incorrect. See discussion in the profile for Elgin (Hatherly) Sillis)
Some family trees state that Edward was baptized on January 24, 1590/1 in Frittenden, Kent. There is indeed a record of an Edward Foster, son of a John Foster, being baptized in Frittenden on that date.[3] However, there is no reason to believe that that record relates to this profile's Edward Foster, and the fact that that date of baptism is a full 20 years before Edward's estimated date of birth based on his date of marriage suggests that it does not.
Immigration; Settlement in Scituate
Anderson states that he migrated to New England in 1632.[1] He settled initially in Plymouth for a few years. He was included in a list of Plymouth residents in 1632.[4] He soon moved to Sciituate, however, and was one of nine who had built houses in that town prior to September 1634.[1]
Marriage and Children
Edward and Lettice Hanford were married on April 8, 1635 by Captain Standish at Mr. Cudworth's in Scituate.[5][1]
Edward and Lettice had the following children, all baptized in Scituate:
Timothy, bpt. March 7, 1635/6 in Scituate,[6][7][1] buried December 5, 1637[8][1]
Timothy, bpt. April 22, 1638 in Scituate,[6][9][1] m. 1st October 13, 1663 Ruth (Tileston) Denton in Dorchester,[1] m. 2d March 9, 1681/2 Relief (Holland) Dowse in Dorchester[1] Savage states that this Timothy died soon and another was born in 1640, but no evidence for this appears.[1]
Elizabeth, b.1644 in Scituate, m. 1st November 9,1665 Ephraim Huet in Scituate, m. 2d January 17, 1681/2 James Ray in Hingham, d. February 15, 1683 in Hingham
Will, Death and Estate
Edward made his will on November 24, 1643. In his will, he names his wife Lettice as executrix and bequeaths one-third of his lands to his son Timothy at age twenty-one, one -third to his unborn child, and one-third to his wife.[1][10] Edward died sometime after the date of his will and February 22, 1643/4 when the inventory of his estate was taken.[1][10]
1633. Assessed 9s in Plymouth tax of March 25, 1633[1]
1634. Assessed 9s in Plymouth tax list of March 27, 1634[1]
1637. Admitted as a Freeman on January 3, 1636/7[1]
1637. Member of Plymouth grand jury of January 3, 1636/7[1]
1637. Included in list of Freemen dated March 7, 1636/7[1]
1637. Member of Plymouth grand jury of March 7, 1636/7[1]
1637. Member of committee to assess charge for sending soldiers against the Pequots, June 7, 1637[1]
1637. Edward Forster of Scituate assessed 12d for selling less than a Winchester quart for 2d[1]
1638. As one of the freemen of Scituate who petitioned Plymouth court on January 1, 1637/8 for a grant of land, he was included among those who were given "all that upland & neck of land lying between the North & South Rivers" along with some meadow[1]
1638. Member of Plymouth grand jury of September 4, 1638[1]
1639. One of a committee of eight Scituate men granted "a plantaion called Seppekann, and the land thereabouts, for the seating of a township for a congregation there," January 22, 1638/9[1]
1639. Scituate member of colony committee to survey highways, March 5, 1638/9[1]
1639. Deputy for Scituate to Plymouth General Court, June 4, 1639[1]
1639. In Scituate section of 1639 list of Plymouth Colony freemen
1640. Member of Plymouth grand jury of March 3, 1639/40[1]
1640. Deputy for Scituate to Plymouth General Court, June 2, 1640[1]
1640. Committee to lay out lands at Scituate, November 30, 1640[1]
1641. Deputy for Scituate to Plymouth General Court, June 1, 1641[1]
1643. On June 2, 1643 sold to George Russell of Hingham "my lot of land both marsh land & upland lying in Scituate at the first herring brook . . . being ten acres more or less[1]
1643. In Scituate section of 1643 Plymouth list of men able to bear arms[1]
Chase, PGM uses the Disputed Origins header for multiple purposes, including alerting readers and project volunteers to profiles at risk of being attached to incorrect parents. We also use it to educate descendants who have fallen prey to bad genealogy. And we use it for tracking purposes. We also keep and link (from the bio) to profiles of disputed parents --even fictional ones-- because if we deleted them, they'd just get recreated. Seen it happen way too many times.
Jillaine - Your post raises some interesting general issues. I have reservations about the benefits of requiring the use of Disputed Origins section any time there are inconsistencies in sources. Most PGM profiles involved disputed facts, and I think it is generally preferable to deal with them organically in the applicable sections of the bio, rather than separate them out above the bio in a "Disputed" section. Also, while I agree that if a disputed parent was a real person with a real profile, it would be good to link to that profile, in cases like here where there is no evidence of the person's existence except as a made-up parent, there is no reason for the parent's profile to even exist or if it does, for anyone to look at it, since it could only repeat the discussion in this profile
Chase, thanks for your work on this profile. Typically when there is disputed information on a PGM profile, we (the project) like to see/add a section above the biography with a = Disputed Origins = section. In that section, we link to the parents and then disconnect them. You're doing such a nice job on this profile, would you please add that? Thanks.