Ruth Elizabeth Giggey was born in 1836, in Saint John, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada. She married David Hunter on 4 October 1855, in Saint John, St. John, New Brunswick, Canada. They were the parents of at least 4 sons and 5 daughters. Ruth was twice married:
1) David HUNTER 4 October 1855, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
2) 2nd Wife of Noah SCRIBNER 20 May 1887 New Brunswick, Canada
She lived in Studholm, Kings, New Brunswick, Canada in 1891 and Kings, New Brunswick, Canada in 1901. She died on 20 January 1911, in Perry Point, Kingston, Kings, New Brunswick, Canada, at the age of 75, and was buried in Kiersteadville Cemetery, Keirsteadville, Kings, New Brunswick, Canada.
Ruth Elizabeth GIGGEY descends from the Loyalist, John GIGGEY.
"Canada Census, 1871," database, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M4MN-SMQ : 7 April 2022), Ruth Hunter in household of David Hunter, Springfield, Kings, New Brunswick, Canada; citing 1871; citing National Archives of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.
"Canada, New Brunswick Provincial Marriages 1789-1950," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:QVBF-V714 : 20 February 2021), Noah Scribner and Ruth Hunter, 20 May 1887; citing Springfield, King's, New Brunswick, Canada, p. 67, Provincial Archives of New Brunswick, Fredericton; FHL microfilm 845,799.
Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/214625587/ruth-elizabeth-scribner: accessed 29 September 2023), memorial page for Ruth Elizabeth Giggey Scribner (1836–20 Jan 1911), Find a Grave Memorial ID 214625587, citing Kiersteadville Cemetery, Keirsteadville, Kings County, New Brunswick, Canada; Maintained by history in stone (contributor 49079785).
Is Ruth your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ruth by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ruth: