Joachim ten Waert Date/ Datering: 22-4-1660 Name/ Voornaam: Joachim Last name / Achternaam: ten Waert subsricption place/ Inschrijfplaats: Amersfoort Subscr. date/ Inschrijfdatum: 22-4-1660 Role/ Rol: Churchmember / Lidmaat date/ Datum: 22-4-1660 place/ Plaatsnaam: Amersfoort Religion/ Kerkelijke gezindte: Reformed/ Hervormd Bijzonderheden: with certification from Bunschoten/ met attestatie van Bunschoten; with his (house) wife/ met zijn huisvrouw: Bertraad Baltus[2]
Marriage
Note on the marriage record: 53A: Joachim wil zijn trouwbelofte gestand doen, maar de kerkenraad weigert de geboden af te kondigen omdat zijn voogden hun toestemming weigeren. Hij verzoekt het stadsbestuur de onwillige voogden tot andere gedachten te brengen. Geen datum.
Translation: (The reason for the civil marriage): "Joachim wants to honor his marriage proposal, but the Church Council/board refuses to post the marriage proclamation because his ( Joachim's) foster parents refuse to give their permission. He then petitions the town council to change the position of the unwilling foster parents. No date (for that) given.
Pls see further notes under Barteraet Baltus
Sources
↑ bronverwijzing: DTB 6, p.37 Archief van de Burgerlijke Stand: doop-, trouw- en begraafboeken van Amsterdam (retroacta van de Burgerlijke Stand) Doopregister: NL-SAA-24453608
DTB Archief Eemland 13, Registration # 13, page 53. The note given on page 53A.
Acknowledgements
This person was created through the import of small2.ged on 30 November 2010. The following data was included in the gedcom. You may wish to edit it for readability.
This person was created through the import of small2.ged on 30 November 2010.
Ten Weerdt-1 and Gillis-809 appear to represent the same person because:
Hi Gus,
Guess we can merge them now, read your posts again, added some info to your Jochem ten Weerdt profile already, and with one of his sisters marrying a Provoost and the ten Waert mentioned in his Bio (as other Last name) . His correct LNAB is Gillis (PPP) so direction is Ten Weerdt-1 into Gillis-809.
Thanks and Merry Christmas :)
Bea
Hi Bea: In the subsequent baptismal A'foort records Bartra (or Bartjen) is referred to as a Baltus (or Bastus), but the marriage certificate gives her an interesting name, no question. I have no further genealogical information, however, and I am not searching for it either. I'm interested in finding a link on the Van Weert side in connection with my uniquely old Y-dna (R1b1a2a1a*).
If you want to follow the Tamwaert's, check the Jan van Delden and/or the Henk Beers Kwartierstaten.
I spotted a Tamwaart in relation to a Dutch settler Provo(o)st in Connecticut, didn't realize the signifcance, made no proper note and can't recollect where to search. Could give me the link I'm looking for.....
A Jochem Gillesen Tanweert, originally from A'dam, is listed to have married Bartraed Baltes de Cuillen in Amersfoort on April 1, 1642. Source: Het Utrechts Archief, DTB Archief Eemland 13, Registration number # 38e, Page 104. If this is the missing spouse, you will find their offspring on WikiTree under Tenwert, Tenweert, Tanwaert, etc. Bartra is listed as a Baltus.
Hi Gus,
Guess we can merge them now, read your posts again, added some info to your Jochem ten Weerdt profile already, and with one of his sisters marrying a Provoost and the ten Waert mentioned in his Bio (as other Last name) . His correct LNAB is Gillis (PPP) so direction is Ten Weerdt-1 into Gillis-809. Thanks and Merry Christmas :) Bea
If you want to follow the Tamwaert's, check the Jan van Delden and/or the Henk Beers Kwartierstaten. I spotted a Tamwaart in relation to a Dutch settler Provo(o)st in Connecticut, didn't realize the signifcance, made no proper note and can't recollect where to search. Could give me the link I'm looking for.....