no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Ferdinand Gulick (1756 - 1836)

Ferdinand Gulick
Born in Sussex, New Jerseymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 1779 in Virginiamap [uncertain]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 79 in Darbyville, Pickaway, Ohio, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 19 Jun 2017
This page has been accessed 412 times.


Biography

1776 Project
Private Ferdinand Gulick served with 2nd Regiment, Hunterdon Militia, New Jersey Militia during the American Revolution.
Daughters of the American Revolution
Ferdinand Gulick is a DAR Patriot Ancestor, A048288.

Ferdinand (or Fernendus) Gulick was born Nov. 15, 1756 in Sussex Co., NJ. He married Hannah Bell Leigh (Lee) (b. July 26, 1755 or 1758; d. Oct. 2, 1820) in 1779 (or 1780) and they had children named Jessie, Samuel, Joseph, John, Amos, Elisha, Daniel, Stephen, William, Mary (Polly), Anna, and Rhoda.[1]

Ferdinand served in the Revolutionary six different times; two months in 1775 under Capt. Sherrard, NJ; one month as a private under Capt. Chris. Johnson; one month in 1775 as a private under Capt. Gronindyke and Col. Chambers; one month as a private in 1778 as a private under Capt. Daniel Brink; one month in 1778 as a private under Capt. Henry Gulick and Col. Beavers; and four months in 1781 as a private under Capt. Henry in Va. He is included in the DAR records (Lineage Book Vol. 149, p. 180). No doubt his service record in the National Archives would give greater details but is known he was in the battle of Millstone Creek, Monmouth Co., NJ. A Pension was Approved 10/27/1832 and a claim was allowed. He came from NJ in Nov. 1778 to Loudoun Co., VA. He and Hannah lived there in 1795. He moved to Hampshire Co., Va., and there remained until the Spring of 1827 when he moved to Muhlenburg Tp., Pickaway Co., Ohio where he applied for his Rev. War Pension on Oct. 27, 1832. Ferdinand died June 4, (prob.) 1836. He is buried in Coleman Hill Cemetery See DAR.[2]

Genealogy Notes

"It has been said by some that Hannah Lee was the sister of Light Horse Lee but this may not be. According to the Lee family Biography and Comp. of Am. Gen. page 685 of Vol. ??, Hannah, Ferdinand's Wife, was born 1775, and Hannah, sister of Light Horse Harry, was born 1766, and married 1787, Corbin Washington, son of John Augustine Washington."[3] Neither one of the persons above is a likely candidate for someone who was married in 1779.

Ferdinand Gulick and Hannah Bell Leigh had 12 known children: Jessie Gulick, 1779–1784; Samuel Gulick, 1779–; Anna Gulick, 1780–1808; Mary Polly Gulick, 1780–1781; Joseph Gulick, 1780–1871; John Gulick, 1783–1854; Amos Gulick, 1783–1858; Elisha Gulick, 1784–1879; Daniel Gulick, 1787–1818; Rhoda M Gulick, 1788–1830; Stephen Gulick, 1792–1846; William Gano Gulick, 1794–1876.

Ferdinand was born about 1740.

Sources

  1. The Gulick Book, Vol. 1 (revised), by Paul I. Gulick.
  2. Ibid. The Gulick Book.
  3. Ibid. The Gulick Book.

Daughters of the American Revolution, DAR Genealogical Research Databases, database online, (http://www.dar.org/ : accessed June 13, 2019), "Record of Ferdinand Gulick", Ancestor # A048288.

  • Book of Gulicks of the USA




Is Ferdinand your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Ferdinand by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Ferdinand:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Gulick-534 and Gulick-285 appear to represent the same person because: This is the same person.
posted by Duane Poncy
Gulick-285 and Gulick-426 appear to represent the same person because: The date of birth is identical, and the date of birth is the same except for the year. I'm fairly certain these are the same people.
posted by Duane Poncy