Dennis Hankins Sr.
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Dennis Hankins Sr. (abt. 1715 - 1740)

Dennis Hankins Sr.
Born about in Craven, NCmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married about 1737 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 25 in Craven, NCmap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Jim Hankins private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 22 Feb 2018
This page has been accessed 2,083 times.

Biography

Dennis was born about 1715. He passed away in 1740.

He was the original owner of Lot 143 in Georgetown, SC

Research Notes

If this is your ancestor, there's a Facebook page for you:

https://www.facebook.com/groups/209300911784/

For right now this is where the bus stops for Hankins of Carolina Colony descendants.

However, from the Elizabeth Haven Kocher papers we have these tantalizing clues from Ray's Index to N.C historical and geneological registers: In 1837 in Chowan, N.C. the estate of Thomas Hankins was divided. On another page of the book are listed John G. Hankins and Sarah Elizabeth Hathaway (dau. of Rev. Thomas V. and wife Caroline E.A.R. Hankins).

In the Carolina Geneoligist there is an account of plats for lands granted before the revolutionary war but which were not recorded before 1775. David Hankins and Dennis Hankins are listed.

Records searching on familysearch brings up a handful of "David Hankins" in the 1700s in the area of southern Pennsylvania/Northern Maryland. This is Quaker country, and we know some of the later Hankinses married Quakers. Is it out of the question to think that our Carolina Hankinses relocated from the Quaker area and that the Glasgow legend perhaps pre-dates a soujourn with the Quakers?

The Quakers kept pretty good records. It might be worth checking them out.

New information about a son of Hankinson-466 potentially casts a light on the origins of Hankins-1129, who I see as the leading candidate to be his father. The former's son James married a local Monmouth woman who was the daughter of an Irish immigrant named Dennis. Since her father Dennis would have arrived in Monmouth within a few years of Hankinson-466's arrival, it stands to reason that Hankins-1129 was perhaps named after a family friend and that there was family intermarriage down the line. At least one Hankinson shortened his name, perhaps Hankins-1129 also did.


Sources

  • Smith, Henry A. M. "Georgetown: The Original Plan and the Earliest Settlers." The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine 9, no. 2 (1908): 85-101. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27575190.

More like this:





Is Dennis your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Dennis by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Dennis:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Based on DNA, I am attaching Hankins-59 and Mary Clevenger as the father.
posted by Anonymous Hankins
His father is said to have died in 1700. Pushing his birth date back before that would seem to give him a less truncated lifespan.
posted by Anonymous Hankins
I've provisionally linked Hankinson-467 as the father rather than 466. My reason for doing so is that he is poorly documented and he went to South Carolina, like his nephew who is copiously documented and some of whose children shortened to Hankins. Richard's offspring also used Hankerson. The reasons for the surname changes are unclear. All of these individuals fit fairly neatly with respect to a trio of family legends, one of which was provided by slaves.

https://www.ancestry.co.uk/boards/surnames.hankinson/63/mb.ashx

posted by Anonymous Hankins
I'm starting to believe that Hankinson-466 is the father. There are more reasons than I want to explain right now, some of them are explained on his profile.
posted by Anonymous Hankins
Hankins-1129 and Hankins-1160 appear to represent the same person because: Hankins 1129 is more or less a stub.
posted by Anonymous Hankins

Rejected matches › Dennis Hawkins

H  >  Hankins  >  Dennis Hankins Sr.

Categories: Hankins Family Brick Walls