no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

James Harmon (abt. 1630 - aft. 1673)

James Harmon aka Harman
Born about in Englandmap [uncertain]
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died after after about age 43 in Saco, York, Massachusetts Baymap [uncertain]
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Michael Lewis private message [send private message] and Eric Rivers private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 2,502 times.

Biography

James Harmon was born around 1630, probably in England. Some have said that he is the son of Francis Harmon and Sarah Martin but no evidence has been offered for this belief.[1][2][3][4][5]

James first appears in Salem, Massachusetts Bay, arriving aboard the Happy Entrance whose master was Richard Margerum and Captain was Robert Harding. It appears that several Salem merchants had owned shares in the ship and that James and other crew had property rights in certain of her prize moneys from voyages Eastward for trade.[5] He began his troublemaking even before disembarking as can be seen in early court records of Essex County.[6]

October 1653 - James Harmon of the Happy Entrance fined for taking out of Mr. John Harvey's chest 101i., and for stealing a stuff coat worth 30s, and also for stealing from John Bartrum a round turned box of wood worth 2s., 6d., in which were ten pounds sterling in pieces of eight.
June 1654 - Capt. Robert Harding v. James Harman - Debt. Withdrawn.
James Harman v. Capt. Robert Harding - for withholding his part of 501i. share aboard the Happy Entrance, for concealing goods and his part of a watch.
November 1654 - Capt. Robert Harding v. James Harmon - for withholding the accounts of the ship.

After landing, he continued to appear before the court.

December 1654 - James Harmon - presented for quarreling and attempting the chastity of Damaris Laskins and Bathsuah Ramand was bound for good behavior with Mr. Elias Stileman surety. He broke his bond by fighting and was fined 10 shillings.

He moved on from Salem north to Saco, in the district of Maine, then a part of Massachusetts Bay. No Harmon's appeared on the list when Saco made a submission to the Massachusetts Bay government on July 5, 1653. James appeared in a rash of cases before the court in Saco.[7]

June 30, 1656 - James Harmon v. John Snelling - Debt - verdict for the defendant.
Richard Hitchcock v. James Harmon - action on an engagement made by him on John Snellings behalf - verdict for the plaintiff.
James Harmon - presented on suspicion of incontinency with Mary Clay - an act of separation decreed with a forfeit of 10 pounds.
James Harmon - presented for swearing an oath and afterwards for swearing two more - fined 30 shillings.
James Harmon - presented for contempt of authority and for abusing the officers with unseemly speeches - fined 20 shillings.

James married Sarah Clark, daughter Edward and Barbara Clark on May 6, 1658, in Saco.[8] That did little to stem the tide of court appearances (more complete list presented in the Davis text).

July 4, 1659 - Stephen Batson and Morgan Howell gave a bond that James Harmon shall appear before the next court to answer his charges from the June 30, 1656, court.
Richard Hitchcock and James Gibbons were allowed 12 shillings as witnesses against James Harmon and James was fined 2 pounds, ten shillings for his offences. James remitted 20 shillings "on hopes of his amendment."
July 3, 1660 - James Harmon - presented for stabbing and cutting his father-in-law, Edward Clark, with his knife and for often swearing and being drunk. He is to receive 20 lashes on the bare back for his "Incorageablenesse" to be administered by John Parker the gaoler and to give a bond for good behavior on which Lieut. John Davisse and Richard Whitte stand engaged.
Whereas the "suspitious words and carages" of James Harmon before the court seemed to "declare his Intentions to depart speedily out of the Countrey", part of his estate valued at 60 pounds was ordered to be held by Edward Clark for the benefit of Sarah Harmon and her child.
October 11, 1660 - The bond of James Harmon and Mary Clay, on the act of separation, was broken.

James appears to have fled, as suspected, but only so far as Essex County where he again appeared in court.

December 1661 - James Harmon fined in Salem for fighting with Peter Harvey.

He did not stay in Essex for long and he continued "a very intemperate and troublesome man" as referred to in the Bradbury text.

July 5, 1664 - On the complaint of James Harmon's wife he is bound in the sum of fifty pounds to be of good behavior toward all persons and especially toward his wife. She has liberty to given her to live with either with her mother or with James Gibbins, where her husband may go to her.
October 12, 1669 - James Harmon presented for abusing and beating his wife. To be whipped 10 stripes and to give a bond for twenty pounds.
July 5, 1670 - James Harmon convicted for being drunk.
Hames Harmon presented for swearing and multiplying oaths.
April 4, 1671 - James Harmon presenting for oppressing one of his children, Jayne Harmon, who is bound to James Gibbons for eight years.
July 1, 1673 - James Harmon presented for being overtaken in drink.

That is the last known record of James Harmon. His wife, Sarah, appears in Boston as a widow in 1680, so he must have died in the interim.

Children

The following are known to have been children of James and Sarah Harmon:

  • Child 1, b. 1659 or 1660 - this child could actually be the same as Jane if the accounting was sloppy but they are known to have a child mentioned in the July 3, 1660, court case.
  • Jayne, b. about 1661 - bound to James Gibbons for a term of eight years April 4, 1671, likely until her age of maturity.
  • James - his mother, Sarah, administered his estate in 1693.
  • Samuel - was a bondsmen for his mother 1693.
  • Barbara, b. December 6, 1667, recorded in Saco records.

Child 1 may have simply been Jayne given the state of the record keeping around the other children. Child 1 could have been John Harmon, who married Sarah Roberts, and he seems to fit here and no other likely place. Child 1 was NOT John Harmon, who married Elizabeth Cummings and secondly Deborah Johnson as was stated without proof in the Harmon text as he was deposed to have been born about 1639.

Footnotes:

  1. Folsom Pages 101, 109, 138, 183
  2. Bradbury Pages 67, 84
  3. Stackpole Page 320
  4. Harmon Page 137-138
  5. 5.0 5.1 Davis Page 6-9
  6. Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County, Massachusetts, 1636-1686 - Cited by many of the texts below including Anderson
  7. Province and Court Records of Maine - Cited by many texts included below including Anderson. The Davis text includes a quite thorough listing.
  8. The source document was torn so that the year could not be read but the relative position shows it must have been 1658 or 1659.

Sources





Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of James's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hello, tracing my roots has led me to here and the question of who James' father is. My Ancestry feed provided Nathaniel Harmon as the father of James, and Francis and Sarah as the parents of Nathaniel. I see discussion that Francis is not James' father - has there been additional research suggesting Nathaniel? I know Ancestry is not necessarily the best source, but from what it provides, I didn't know if they may have found updated records since the last of this discussion. Thanks!
posted by Andrew Mason
Harmon-1950 and Harmon-106 appear to represent the same person because: Lets try this again. The information is/was in the bio. Every date and place on this person is speculative. We have little clue as to his birth and birth place. He died after 1673, the last place he was known to be was Saco, Massachusetts (No Maine until much later)
posted by Anne B
Harmon-1950 and Harmon-106 do not represent the same person because: Non of the information is the same other than the name. Two different people.
posted by Michael Lewis
Eric these parents should be disconnected. Objections?
posted by Anne B
There is no evidence that James was son of Francis, Objections to disconnecting? 8/18/15

As I've researced this James, I've seen no suggestions by any of the sources that he was son of Francis I am disconnecting. update 9/3/15

posted by Anne B

H  >  Harmon  >  James Harmon