Source: S167 Title: U.S. Public Records Index Publication: Name: The Generations Network, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2009; Repository: #R1 NOTEMerlin Data Publishing Corporation, comp, Historical Residential White Page, Directory Assistance and Other Household Database Listings, : Merlin Data Publishing Corporation, 215 South Complex Drive, Kalispell, MT 59901
Source: S202 Title: U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1 Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2010; Repository: #R1 NOTEVoter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings
Source: S210 Title: U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 2 Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2010; Repository: #R1 NOTEVoter Registration Lists, Public Record Filings, Historical Residential Records, and Other Household Database Listings
Greg Hays's DNA has been tested for genealogical purposes. It may be possible to confirm family relationships by comparing test results with Greg or other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Family Tree DNA Y-DNA Test 37 markers, haplogroup R-M173, Ysearch 78AD4, FTDNA kit #B33760
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Family Tree DNA mtDNA Test HVR1 and HVR2, haplogroup V-C72T, FTDNA kit #514075
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share DNA with Greg:
AncestryDNA, GEDmatch A170026, Ancestry member greghays4 +
Family Tree DNA Family Finder, FTDNA kit #B33760 +
Autosomal DNA Test, GEDmatch 1436021
Hyde-3484 - Thanks for asking. Yes, it's the same person. The family name of the Newton, MA clan of Hyde was subjected to misspellings by the successive town clerks, and can appear as: Hid, Hids, Hide, Hides, Hyde, or Hydes. A few of them have stuck.
Greg -- I'm puzzled by your comment on my page that the publicly accessible FamilySearch site is a preferable source to Find My Past. As a researcher, I prefer to access original records, and for my profiles that you are commenting on (even as I am trying to create them), original records are _not_ available on Family Search. Instead, what I find there are transcriptions, and these often have errors.
My thanks, though, on your other suggestions, and willing to step in and offer ideas.
Greg -- re: your comment on sources for the profiles I've just started, I would very much appreciate your help on how much to include. For example, although I've simply listed "England Select Marriage" or "Yorkshire Births (FindmyPast)", the location, name and place information is sufficients for other researchers to find the record. But again, concrete examples would be useful as I am finding my way.
I’m Susie the new leader of the England Project. We are contacting all existing members of the project to find out how you are currently involved, and how you would like to be involved moving forward. Please have a look at the England Project page for more information, and then contact either myself or Gillian to let us know what you’d like to do, or if you have any questions. We can then list your interests, help you join the team in the Google group forum for England, and give you any help you might need to get going. If we don’t hear back from you we’ll assume you no longer want to be a part of the England Project at this time.
Many thanks and I look forward to hearing from you,
Hi Greg, I just left you a message on Eleanor Brice's profile. I have noticed that you have at least one other profile located at that top level Kent category. If you have a chance to review those and any others and relocate if possible, that would be fantastic. Thanks so much. Gillian