| Thomas Hayward is a part of Massachusetts history. Join: Massachusetts Project Discuss: massachusetts |
Note: This is not the profile for Thomas Hayward from Aylesford, Kent who emigrated on the Hercules with his wife Susanna and his five children. That Thomas Hayward was the Thomas Hayward who settled in Duxbury and Bridgewater.
Contents |
This is the profile for "old" Thomas Hayward who died in Ipswich, Massachusetts on April 15, 1686.
The list of persons enrolled at Sandwich to emigrate to New England in 1635 aboard the Hercules included a Thomas Hayward of Aylesford, Kent, his wife Susanna and five children. The versions of this list that were published before 1921, including the one in William Boys' 1792 History of Sandwich in Kent[1] and in Hotten's 1874 Original Lists of Persons of Quality,[2] did not include the names of the children. On the basis of the list in History of Sandwich in Kent, Jarvis Cutler Howard, in his 1884 Howard Genealogy, asserted that it was "highly probable" that Thomas Howard or Hayward of Ipswich was the Thomas Hayward who emigrated aboard the Hercules.[3] In 1921, however, a complete version of the list of persons enrolled for passage on the Hercules was published in the NEHGR, which included the names of children and apprentices and listed Thomas and Susanna Hayward's children as Thomas, John, Elizabeth, Susan and Martha.[4] Since this list of children's names matches the names of the children of Thomas Hayward of Cambridge, Duxbury and Bridgewater, it has now been established that he, and not Thomas Hayward of Ipswich, was the Thomas Hayward who immigrated on the Hercules.[5]
Unfortunately, most of what was thought to have been known about Thomas Hayward of Ipswich was based on the mistaken belief that he was the Thomas Hayward who was on the Hercules passenger list. Since the information from that list has been found not to relate to Thomas Hayward of Ipswich, there is no evidence as to his origin, his wife's name, his occupation, where he emigrated from, or the number of children (if any) he emigrated with.
Set forth below are the only records that have been found that is known to relate to this profile's Thomas Hayward/Haward/Howard.
According to Hammatt, an account of Robert Lord in 1678 indicates that Thomas may have been a hatter and was charged for "recording a marriage and birth" and for "recording three births."[9] Hammatt's description of the account as relating to Thomas has not been confirmed, as others have been unable to find the record of the account. However, the fact that William Hayward was a hatmaker and the fact that, in 1678, Thomas would have been well beyond the age of recording births, suggest that the record that Hammatt was referring to may have actually related to William Hayward.
There are no references to Thomas Hayward/Haward/Howard in Ipswich town records, based on a search of Ancient Records of the Town of Ipswich, for Ipswich town records up through 1650,[10] and a manual review of the transcription of Ipswich town records on ancestry.com, for Ipswich town records from 1650 through 1686.[11]
There are no reference to Thomas Hayward/Haward/Howard in any of the five volumes Shurtleff's Records of the Governor and Company of the Massachusetts in New England, which go up through 1686.[12]
A search in December 2019 for records of Thomas Hayward/Haward/Howard in the Essex County, MA: Early Probate Records, 1635-1681 and Essex County, MA: Probate File Papers, 1638-1881 databases found no matching records.
The only reference in the Records and Files of the Quarterly Courts of Essex County that probably relates to Thomas Hayward/Haward/Howard of Ipswich is the 1678 record referenced above. (Note that there are a number of records, however, that appear to relate to Thomas Howard/Howard of Lynn/Salem, who was a much younger man.)
Thomas' parentage is unknown. Some genealogies make Thomas to be the son of John Howard of Norfolk County, England, and his wife Elizabeth, who was baptized April 4th, 1614 in Brockdish, Norfolk County, [13] This proposition seems highly speculative absent additional evidence. A search on familysearch.org in December 2019 for Thomas Hayward/Haward/Howard born in England in 1600-1620 returned 90 baptismal records.
Based on the fact that Thomas' presumed son William was probably born sometime in 1634-1640, it is likely that Thomas was born sometime in 1605-1615, with about 1610 being a reasonable midpoint estimate. Based on this estimated date of birth, he was probably born somewhere in England.
No evidence has been found for the name of Thomas' wife. The claim that her name was Susanna was based on the mistaken belief that Thomas was the Thomas Hayward included on the list of Hercules passengers. Assuming that Thomas the father of William Hayward/Howard of Ipswich, then, based on William's estimated date of birth (sometime in 1634-1640), Thomas was probably married sometime in 1630-1639, with about 1634 being a reasonable midpoint estimate. Since there is no evidence placing Thomas in New England prior to 1678, he was most likely married in England.
In his Howard Genealogy, Jarvis Cutler Howard listed the following as "very likely" Thomas' children:
Ramon Meyers Tingley, in his 1935 Some Ancestral Lines, listed the following 6 children for Thomas:
Tingley, however, cited no sources, except citing the Kinnie Genealogy for Ann's marriage, and assumed that Thomas was the Thomas who immigrated aboard the Hercules.[14] None of the births, marriages or deaths Tingley listed are included in Vital Records of Ipswich, except for William Howard's death in 1709.[15]
Based on the meager evidence, the cases for Thomas' parentage of William and Hannah appear the strongest, but still not particularly strong. The evidence that suggests that Thomas was William's father is (1) the fact that when Thomas died in 1686 he was referred to as "old Thomas Hayward" indicates that Thomas was probably the correct age to have been William's father, (2) the fact that both Thomas and William lived in Ipswich and Thomas was the only Hayward/Haward/Howard known to have been living in Ispwich who could have been William's father, and (3) the absence of evidence that makes Thomas's paternity of William unlikely. The probability that Thomas was William's father would be much higher if Hammatt's statement that an account of Robert Lord in 1678 indicates that Thomas was a hatter could be relied upon.[9] However, since Hammatt states that the 1678 record relates to recording births, the record referrred to by Hammatt may well relate to this profile's William Hayward rather than Thomas Hayward. If William was in fact Thomas' son, since William's will directs his sons to take care of his sister Hannah Howard,[16] Hannah was probably also Thomas' child.
The case for Thomas' parentage of John Howard/Haward of Rowley is weaker and appears based purely on the proximity of Rowley to Ipswich. Therefore Thomas' parentage of John appears to be merely possible.
No evidence in favor of Thomas' parentage of the other children mentioned by Tingley has been found.
A cenotaph erected in memory of Thomas "Howard" in the Old Burial Ground in Ipswich states that Thomas immigrated in 1634.[17] However, no reliable evidence supporting that date of immigration has been found, and the statement was no doubt based on the mistaken belief that Thomas was the Thomas Hayward who emigrated aboard the Hercules in March 1634/5.
Since there is no evidence placing Thomas' presumed son William in New England prior to about 1665, no evidence placing his presumed daughter Hannah in New England until 1677 and no evidence placing Thomas himself in New England until 1678, perhaps the most likely scenario for Thomas' immigration to New England is that, first, his son William emigrated to New England in or shortly before 1665, then, after William became established in Ipswich, his elderly father, Thomas, and spinster sister, Hannah, joined him in about 1675.
No evidence has been found that establishes where Thomas (or William or Hannah) were living prior to their emigration to New England, although they were very probably living somewhere in England.
"Old" Thomas Hayward died in Ipswich, Massachusetts on April 15, 1686.[7][8][9]
Thomas was born "1601" so he would be 23 years when John HAYWARD was born so he is NOT his.................
Burial: Founders Cemetery, Norwich, New London County, Connecticut Memorial ID: 126577133 Married Mary Wellman 1866, Thomas w/b 39 years old.
"Thomas Howard, born 1 Jan 1601 in Kent, England, died 15 Apr 1686 (aged 85) in Ipswich, Essex County, Massachusetts"
Parents: John Howard, 1578–1642 [citation needed]
Siblings
Children
[11] [6] [14] [9] [17] [13] [15] [8] [10] [12] [5] [4] [16] [7] [3] [2] [1]
See also:
This week's connection theme is Game Show Hosts. Thomas is 17 degrees from Chuck Woolery, 13 degrees from Dick Clark, 24 degrees from Richard Dawson, 29 degrees from Cornelia Zulver, 31 degrees from Magnus Härenstam, 34 degrees from Steve Harvey, 19 degrees from Vicki Lawrence, 14 degrees from Allen Ludden, 17 degrees from Michael Strahan, 16 degrees from Alex Trebek, 16 degrees from Ian Turpie and 31 degrees from Léon Zitrone on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
WHY??? did the family Descendants change their name to HOWARD from HAYWARD???? as per the 3 sons linked who are known as Howard. too confusing. f-a-g is also Howard on the cenotaph.. would be great to find out WHO paid to have that done and where they got their sources...waste of a ton of money back then to get it WRONG don't you think?
This profile is just tooooo confusing.. I don't see a SOURCE that wins my trust... the history books are MIXING the 2 names..
Any one mind if we undo the merge.... Jack I know you can do that, if you agree of course. thank you Carole and I will let YOU have the f-a-g mixup
edited by Carole Taylor
Yes, I think descendants of Thomas adopted the spelling of Howard. I find spelling changes between the first and second generation were not uncommon. Another case of Hayward changing to Howard was John Haward/Hayward/Howard who married the daughter of Thomas Hayward of Bridgewater. His children also adopted the name Howard.
edited by Chase Ashley
Old Burying Ground: Ipswich, Essex County, Massachusetts memorial ID 80703369
IS NOT the one you have working on here??? married to a Susanna? then I guess I will keep going on the research I have for the HOWARD FAMILY THIS is the family I am working on..............
edited by Carole Taylor
The theory doesn't even seem to have been widely adopted by internet family trees.
See Directory p. 157 Thomas Hayward.
See GM here: https://www.americanancestors.org/databases/great-migration-immigrants-to-new-england-1634-1635-volume-iii-g-h/image?pageName=288&volumeId=7118
One consequence is that I don't think we know what his wife's name was and another is that it revives the possibility that he was the son of John Howard b in 1614.
I don't think there is any firm evidence he was PGM. Anderson doesn't list him in his GM Directory.
To me it appears to be a history book History of Portage County, Ohio: Containing a History of the County" page 596,