no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Holland (bef. 1644 - abt. 1707)

John Holland
Born before in Englandmap [uncertain]
Son of [uncertain] and [uncertain]
Husband of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died about after about age 63 in Nansemond County, Colony of Virginiamap [uncertain]
Profile last modified | Created 3 Aug 2011
This page has been accessed 6,399 times.
There are disproven, disputed, or competing theories about this person's parents. See the text for details.
The Birth Date is a rough estimate. See the text for details.
US Southern Colonies.
John Holland resided in the Southern Colonies in North America before 1776.
Join: US Southern Colonies Project
Discuss: southern_colonies

Contents

Biography

Birth

Assuming that he was about 20 years old when he was transported to Virginia, John Holland was probably born before 1644 in England. The first known record referring to him is the record of the headright granted on 20 February 1664 to Lt. Col. John Blake and Mr. Edward Ison for his transportation to Virginia. John was one of 50 persons transported by Blake and Ison, and was most likely transported as an indentured servant. [1] The details of his early life are unknown. The frequently repeated claims that he was born in 1628 in Jamestown and was the son of Gabriel Holland are disputed and almost certainly incorrect, as discussed in the Research Notes below.

Later Life

Likely after completing a period of 4-7 years indentured servitude, John Holland acquired land and appears to have prospered in Nansemond County, Colony of Virginia. On April 20, 1682, John Holland patented 760 acres in the Upper Parish of Nansemond at the miles end of Walter Bagley[2], and on April 16, 1683, he patented 200 acres in the same parish at a place called Kingsdale.[3] Another patent was granted him on April 20, 1694, for 500 acres on the east side of Capt. Johns Swamp. [4][5]

In 1704, John Holland appears on the Quit Rents of Virginia as the owner of 700 acres in Nansemond County. Also appearing on those lists in Nansemond County are Henry Holland (400 acres) and Joseph Holland (100 acres).[6] (Contrary to the false claims repeated in many accounts, these 1704 Quit Rents do not include any ages for the men listed. See discussion in the Disputed Origins section of the Research Notes below.)

Marriage

There is no known record identifying John Holland's spouse. Some unsourced online trees, including a prior version of this profile, identify her as Elizabeth Oudelant, but there is no known reliable source to support this claim.

Death

He reportedly died in 1707 in Nansemond County.[citation needed]

Children

John Bennett Boddie concluded that it was likely John was the father of at least four sons:[5]

  1. Henry
  2. James
  3. Joseph
  4. John

Some researchers have also claimed that he was the father of Michael Holland, but that claim is disputed and unlikely to be correct for the reasons discussed in Michael's profile.[7]

The following additional children have also been previously attached to this profile, with no supporting sources:

  1. Stephen
  2. Elizabeth
  3. Mary

Research Notes

Disputed Origins

Some researchers, apparently beginning with Kirk Davis Holland in his 1963 typescript Holland: A History of the Virginia Holland Familes from 1620 to 1963,[8] and also including Jeannette Holland Austin in her book The Georgia Frontier, published in 2005,[9] have claimed that he was born in 1628 in the Jamestown Colony and was the son of Gabriel Holland. Neither of these researchers cites any reliable source for these claims and they are almost certainly incorrect.

The claim that John was born in 1628 is based on the false statement by Jeannette Holland Austin that the 1704 Quit Rents of Virginia give the ages of the men listed, and state that John Holland of Nansemond County was 76 years old in 1704.[9] She apparently makes this statement in reliance upon Kirk Davis Holland, who also cites the 1704 Quit Rents and then makes the unsourced claim immediately afterward that the three Holland men of Nansemond County listed in those Quit Rents were ages 76 (John), 47 (Henry) and 20 (Joseph).[10] This claim is frequently repeated in other unsourced online trees, and was included in a prior version of this profile. However, the 1704 Quit Rents do not provide any ages for the men listed.[6] This claim is simply false.

The claim that John Holland was the son of Gabriel Holland is also disputed. Neither Kirk Davis Holland nor Jeannette Holland Austin cite any source for this claim. There are two men named Gabriel Holland known to have been in Virginia during the 1620s - the first was killed by Indians in an attack on the Berkley Hundred in 1621; the second, represented by Gabriel Holland, was married to a Mary (___) and lived in Jamestown but appears to have died before 1627 when his wife Mary was granted a patent in her own name on the Island of James City.[5] There is no known connection between this Gabriel Holland and the John Holland who was transported to Virginia by Blake and Ison and for whom they received a headright in Nansemond County on 20 February 1664.

Headright Details

John Holland was a headright of Lt. Col. Blake and Edward Isom granted on 20 February 1664. He was one of 50 persons transported by Blake and Isom, for whom they were granted 2500 acres of land in Nansemond County.[1] The index of this record in Cavaliers and Pioneers is as follows:

  • LT.COL JNO. BLAKE & MR. EDWARD ISON, 2500 acs. Nancimond Co., 20 Feb. 1664, p. 154 (28). Trans. of 50 pers: Jno. Holland, Jno Gaye, Eliz. Ludlow, Ambrose Right, Jno. Members, Joyce Arnall, Maudlin Jones, Mathew Castome, Richard Harris, Peter Rich, Robert White, John Wale, James Diddicut, A Negro boy, Henry Mills, Heny Stone, Wm. Warde, Wm. Harrison, Xtopher Ashly, Eliz. Baly, Jane Fisher, Alice King, George Coales, Danll Burton, Jno. Johnson, Richard Newman, John Hewes, Mary Cocke, Tho. Belcher, John Fowke, 3 Negroes, Arthur Hope, Alice Steward, Robt. Harrison, 2 Negroes, Giles Danby, Danll. Rock, John Steward,Wm. Jones, Thomas Spicer, James Kirkcomb, Hen. Cutterbooke, John Dodd, A Negro, Matthew Holter, Thomas Mills, Wm. Jnoson.

This record is misinterpreted by many researchers to support a claim that John Holland himself received 2500 acres in Nansemond County, and/or that he was responsible for transporting the emigrants referenced in this headright claim. This error appears to originate with Kirk Davis Holland.[11] This assertion is patently false. John Holland was one of the transported passengers, not a recipient of the headright. Kirk Davis Holland clearly had reviewed this index record in Cavaliers and Pioneers, so he either badly misinterpreted it or was intentionally misrepresenting it.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Nell Marion Nugent, Cavaliers and Pioneers: Abstracts of Virginia Land Patnes and Grants 1623-1666, (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1963), 484; images, Hathitrust, (https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/005994001 : accessed 19 Jun 2023).
  2. Patents, v. 7, 1679-1689 Image 172 of 729
  3. Patents, v. 7, 1679-1689 Image 261 of 729
  4. Patents, v. 8, 1689-1695 Image 362 of 464
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 John Bennett Boddie, Historical Southern Families, 23 vols., (1957, reprint Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1967), 1:269; images, Ancestry, (https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/48273/ : accessed 22 Jun 2023); Ancestry Sharing Link.
  6. 6.0 6.1 Annie Laurie Wright Smith, comp., The Quit Rents of Virginia 1704, (1957, reprint Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 1975), 45; images, Ancestry, (https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/48421/ : accessed 22 Jun 2023); Ancestry Sharing Link.
  7. See Disputed Parents section of the Research Notes in Michael's profile.
  8. Kirk Davis Holland, "Holland: A History of the Virginia Holland Familes from 1620 to 1963," (typescript, 1963); images, FamilySearch, (https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/records/item/726355-holland-a-history-of-the-virginia-holland-families-from-1620-to-1963 : accessed 19 Jun 2023), pps. 28, 189 & 203-204. Also available on Hathitrust here.
  9. 9.0 9.1 Jeannette Holland Austin, The Georgia Frontier, 3 vols, (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2005), 3:154.
  10. Kirk Davis Holland, "Holland: A History of the Virginia Holland Familes from 1620 to 1963," at 28.
  11. Kirk Davis Holland, Holland, at 28 ("Acting as Headright under Lt. Blake and Edward Ison, he patented 2500 acres in Nansemond County, Virginia, February 20, 1664, the first proved date. John Holland transported 60 persons from England to the Colony, Records of Virginia Company, Cavaliers and Pioneers by Nugent, page 444.")




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 15

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
I am a Holland descendent who grew up in the former Nansemond Coumty in the Holland area. Kingsale Rd ran by my house and as a kid, could look at the old house built in 1690 by Capt Henry Holland from the school bus window. My siblings and I sold some of the land that was owned by Hollands for 300 years last year. It was after this sale that I discovered this history.
posted by Phyllis Carr
Hi Phyllis. I am distantly related to the Carr family. Is this Holland related to the Fox Taylor family at all? The Hollands were aristocrats in Great Britain. Thanks
posted by Pamela (Taylor) Emery
For the reasons explained in the biography and research notes, the current parents Gabriel Holland and Mary Pincke are disputed and almost certainly incorrect. I propose to detach those parents. Please weigh in if you object.

Also, the children Stephen, Mary, and both Elizabeths are unsourced. I plan to detach those children also. If you disagree, please identify the source supporting the claim that those children should remain attached.

posted by Scott McClain
The current version of this profile includes a number unsourced and disputed claims, many of which originate in a 1963 typescript entitled Holland: A History of the Virginia Holland Familes from 1620 to 1963, by Kirk Davis Holland (https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/records/item/726355-holland-a-history-of-the-virginia-holland-families-from-1620-to-1963 and were repeated by Jeannette Holland Austin in her book The Georgia Frontier, published in 2005, but are unsourced and disputed. Some of the information originates with a Jasper Land Holland, whose work is highly suspect. For a detailed discussion of these claims, see The Truth About Gabriel Holland and The John Holland Family of Nansemond, A Burnt Virginia County. I plan to do some clean up on the profile to add sources and remove these disputed/false claims. If anyone is interested in collaborating on this effort, please weigh in.
posted by Scott McClain
edited by Scott McClain
Father of James Holland is John Holland of Nansemond
posted by Cynthia (Hicks) Curtis
Holland- 2594 and Holland-1028 seem to be duplicates.
Holland-3529 and Holland-1028 are not ready to be merged because: Possible match due to common spouse, but discrepancies with parents and siblings need to be resolved before a merge.
posted by Sam Bowden Jr
Holland-3529 and Holland-1028 appear to represent the same person because: Same parents, same spouse, and similar birth dates make it clear that these are INTENDED to represent the same person. Discrepancies should be resolvable by looking carefully at the sources.
posted by Ellen Smith
I set Holland-4701 and Holland-1028 as rejected after reading their biographies. The man who inherited land from his father in 1652 & died before 1656 cannot be the man who was listed as a headright in 1664 & nearly 20 years later patented land.
posted by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
Holland-1177 and Holland-1028 appear to represent the same person because: Same name, same wife, dates are estimated
posted by Bob Tonsmeire
Holland-1177 and Holland-1028 do not represent the same person because: They are two different persons.
posted by [Living Stewart]
Holland-1177 and Holland-1028 appear to represent the same person because: these are duplicate profiles, please merge into lowest number. thanks.
posted by [Living Stewart]
Holland-1529 and Holland-1028 appear to represent the same person because: these are duplicate profiles, please merge into lowest number.
posted by [Living Stewart]

Unmerged matches › John Holland Jr (1630-bef.1704)
Rejected matches › John Holland (bef.1761-abt.1849)

H  >  Holland  >  John Holland

Categories: Estimated Birth Date | Virginia Colonists