no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Holmes (1660)

John Holmes
Born in Stamford, Fairfield, Connecticutmap
Ancestors ancestors
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Jennifer Pettigrew private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 10 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 580 times.

Biography

John Holmes died young.

John Holmes was born 18 Oct 1660 in Stamford, Connecticut, the son of John Holmes. [1]

According to Jacobus, this John Holmes died young. [2]

Sources

  1. "Connecticut Births and Christenings, 1649-1906," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F749-LQX : 3 December 2014), John Homes, 18 Oct 1660; citing ; FHL microfilm unknown.
  2. History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield, Vol. 1, by Donald Lines Jacobus, Genealogical Publishing Com, 1991, p. 291

See also:

Profile history:

  • WikiTree profile Holmes-1283 created through the import of CBT.ged on Jul 9, 2011 by Chuck Tryon. See the Changes page for the details of edits by Chuck and others.
  • Source: S-2141137667 Repository: #R-2141141864 Title: Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Note: This information comes from 1 or more individual Ancestry Family Tree files. This source citation points you to a current version of those files. Note: The owners of these tree files may have removed or changed information since this source citation was created. Page: Ancestry Family Trees Note: Data: Text: http://trees.ancestry.com/pt/AMTCitationRedir.aspx?tid=15668154&pid=124 No REPO record found with id R-2141141864.




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of John's ancestors' DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 do not represent the same person because: Holmes-1283 died young while Holmes-5650 married and had children. One is likely attached to the wrong parents
posted by S (Hill) Willson
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 do not represent the same person because: This is the fourth time this merge has been proposed (see comments on Holmes-1283). The first three times, I set it to an unmerged match because Holmes-1283 died young and Holmes-5650 married and had children, therefore they cannot be the same John Holmes. Setting them to a rejected match until someone can provide primary/reliable source indicating which one was the son of John Holmes-1284 and Rachel Waterbury.
posted by Fred Prisley
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 are not ready to be merged because: These may be two different John Holmes. I don't believe the profiles should be merged without a primary or reliable secondary source that shows that this John Holmes is the son of John Holmes-1284 and Rachel Waterbury-72.
posted by Fred Prisley
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate same date of birth, siblings, parents etc etc.
posted by Chris Hoult
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 are not ready to be merged because: These profiles should not be merged until the issues with Holmes-5650 are resolved. Holmes-5650 appears to be a combination of two different John Holmes: one who died young, per Jacobus, and one who married Sarah Clark. Unless a source is found that connects the John Holmes who married Sarah Clark to parents John Holmes and Rachel Waterbury, this merge should not be made.
posted by Fred Prisley
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 appear to represent the same person because: These appear to be the same person. Complete match on family details
posted by Chris Hoult
Holmes-5650 and Holmes-1283 appear to represent the same person because: Clear duplicate same family details
posted by Chris Hoult
Holmes-9259 and Holmes-1283 do not represent the same person because: John Holmes-1283 died young and would not have been married. Need a reliable/primary source to confirm that the John Holmes who married Sarah Clark and had a daughter named Rachel was the same John Holmes who was the son of John Holmes and Rachel Waterbury.
posted by Fred Prisley
Holmes-9259 and Holmes-1283 appear to represent the same person because: This appears to be the same person. Same DOB and same siblings.
posted by Norma Bostwick

H  >  Holmes  >  John Holmes