no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Sarah (Hood) Jarvis (1770 - abt. 1830)

Sarah Jarvis formerly Hood aka O'Brien
Born in Harford, Marylandmap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1771 in Marylandmap
Wife of — married 28 Jun 1798 in Harford, Maryland, United Statesmap
Descendants descendants
Died about at about age 60 in Lewis, West Virginia, United Statesmap
Profile last modified | Created 22 Jul 2019
This page has been accessed 312 times.

Biography

This profile is part of the Barnes Name Study.

Sarah O'Brien ... [1]

Sarah was born about 1770. Sarah Dnk ... She passed away about 1830. [2]

Name

Sarah Hood O'Brien

Sarah was born in 1770. She passed away in 1830.

Sources

  1. Entered by Kim Wright, Oct 30, 2011
  2. Entered by Shirley Doney, Aug 16, 2011






Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 10

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hood-7415 and Hood-4931 appear to represent the same person because: Same person
posted by Harold Whitbread
Comparing Kit A590119 (*Bud Barnes) [Migration - F2 - A] and Kit A905477 (veronica alward) [Migration - F2 - A]

Largest segment = 6.6 cM

Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 6.6cM (0.183 Pct) Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 7.5

1 shared segments found for this comparison.

posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Donald Barnes
Comparing Kit A590119 (*Bud Barnes) [Migration - F2 - A] and Kit A752610 (Katie Jarvis) [Migration - F2 - A

Largest segment = 6.3 cM

Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 6.3cM (0.176 Pct) Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 7.6

1 shared segments found for this comparison.

posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Donald Barnes
Comparing Kit A590119 (*Bud Barnes) [Migration - F2 - A] and Kit A605848 (*CherokeeMadWoman) [Migration - F2 - A]

Largest segment = 5 cM

Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 5cM (0.14 Pct) Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 7.7

1 shared segments found for this comparison.

posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Donald Barnes
Comparing Kit A590119 (*Bud Barnes) [Migration - F2 - A] and Kit A738136 (*Bob Tiffner) [Migration - F2 - A]

Largest segment = 9.2 cM

Total Half-Match segments (HIR) 9.2cM (0.257 Pct) Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 6.1

1 shared segments found for this comparison.

posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Donald Barnes
John Hood Jr & his wife Hannah Barnes had 1 daughter Sarah b. Nov. 5, 1771& d. in 1831 BUT she wasn't married to a Jarvis or O'Brien. She married Walter Tolley Worthington & had 8 kids. Mary, Martha, Elizabeth, Comfort, Hannah, John H, Samuel & Charles. This info is from the Shipleys of Maryland website.

This link- https://books.google.com/books?id=vgINAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA472&lpg=PA472&dq=hannah+barnes+john+hood+genealogy&source=bl&ots=vDP-CRGmEi&sig=ACfU3U2LkluFpVK-eaFS80EolzMRfxoy9g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjeo-uRhrvzAhUSlHIEHfT8DxEQ6AF6BAgPEAM#v=onepage&q=hannah%20barnes%20john%20hood%20genealogy&f=false states that in John Hood Sr's will in 1785 mentions his grandaughter Sarah Hood. In 1795 John Sr's wife Elizabeth Shipley Hood mentions her granddaughter Sarah Worthington & in John Hood Jr's will of 1795 he mentions his daughter Sarah Worthington. There were several different Hood families in Maryland around this time. Maybe she belonged to one of them. I don't understand why you have her as Sarah Jarvis formerly Barnes? Was she a Barnes? If she was a Hood her name should be Sarah Jarvis formally Hood.

posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Nancy Yeager
I appreciate your comment on Sarah Barnes and will take that into consideration moving forward. When I took another look based on your question, I realized I've had lots of problems on this particular line for years, so for me, it's not a simple fix. I've found so many conflicting issues with John Jarvis II being connected to a Sarah - names of Sarah O'Brien, Sarah Ann Richards and Sarah Barnes. Unfortunately, I don't have the time right now to do the research that it will take...hours upon hours, to go back through all my records to try and sort things again. As for the record showing Sarah Barnes instead of Sarah Hood, you're correct, I'm not sure why it was listed that way. Thank you again, for your information to help sort this out. Also, thank you for the source book...lots of great information!
posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Kim (Burkhammer) Wright
edited by Kim (Burkhammer) Wright
Now this interesting to see. I must missed something. Do we have documentation she was listed as Barnes. I love to have copies of it for my files.

Billie

posted on Barnes-21578 (merged) by Billie (Bright) Keaffaber
Hood-4586 and O'Brien-98 appear to represent the same person because: Same information on each person ie. husband and parents
posted on O'Brien-98 (merged) by Robert Tiffner
Dnk-6 and O'Brien-796 appear to represent the same person because: Must be the same person, not sure what DNK stood for, but, believe that it is the same as unknown...
posted on O'Brien-98 (merged) by Robin Lee

H  >  Hood  |  J  >  Jarvis  >  Sarah (Hood) Jarvis

Categories: Barnes Name Study