no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Thomas Howe (1681 - 1753)

Thomas Howe
Born in Watford, Hertfordshire, Englandmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 28 Jun 1709 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died at age 71 in Montgomery, Pennsylvania, British Colonial Americamap
Problems/Questions
Profile last modified | Created 9 Apr 2019
This page has been accessed 322 times.

Biography

Thomas was born in 1681. He passed away in 1753.[1]

Christening

Thomas Howell, England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975[2]

  • Fact: Burial (1753) Trappe, Montgomery, Pennsylvania, United States of America
  • Fact: Residence Scotter, Lincolnshire, England

Sources

  1. Find a Grave, database and images (https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/132869504/thomas-howe: accessed 02 October 2022), memorial page for Thomas Howe (unknown–1 Apr 1753), Find a Grave Memorial ID 132869504, citing Augustus Lutheran Church Cemetery, Trappe, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, USA; Maintained by Bill Daugherty (contributor 47160704).
  2. "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975", database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JMPY-WNB : 18 September 2020), Thomas Howell, 1681.

See also:

Residence Place:
Gender: Male
Christening Date: 04 Apr 1681
Christening Date (Original): 04 APR 1681
Christening Place: OSWESTRY,SHROPSHIRE,ENGLAND
Birthplace:
Birth Date:
Name Note:
Death Date:
Father's Name: William Howell
Race:
Father's Birthplace:
Father's Age:
Mother's Name:
Indexing Project (Batch) Number: C02071-2
Mother's Birthplace:
Mother's Age:
System Origin: England-ODM
GS Film number: 908231
Reference ID:
  • Citing this Record: "England Births and Christenings, 1538-1975," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JMPY-WNB : 11 February 2018, Thomas Howell, 04 Apr 1681); citing , index based upon data collected by the Genealogical Society of Utah, Salt Lake City; FHL microfilm 908,231.
  • Thomas How mentioned in the record of Katheren
Name: Thomas How
Sex: Unknown
Wife: Katheren
Other information in the record of Katheren from England, Essex Parish Registers
Spouse's Name:
Thomas How
Find A Grave Index
Name: Thomas Howe
Event Type: Burial
Event Date: 1753
Event Place: Trappe, Montgomery, Pennsylvania, United States of America
Photograph Included: N
Death Date: 01 Apr 1753
Affiliate Record Identifier: 132869504
Cemetery: Trappe Evangelical Congregational Cemetery




Is Thomas your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Thomas by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Thomas:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hi John,

Trees are not considered a reliable source for Pre-1700 profiles but you can often find the source in trees.

Please see Help:Sources FAQ

Thanks, David

posted by David Selman
Howdy David.

It's a bit murky as to my involvement in this profile. My Howe line doesn't go back this far as of yet, and, for the life of me, I'm not sure why I'm the PM. I was obviously involved in a merge back in Jan, and that is where all of the tree info came from. I'm going to have to refer to my notes to see what I can find. Sorry for any inconvenience.

John

posted by John Vaskie
i agree and have no problems with the merge.
posted by John Vaskie
Howe-10221 and Howe-9840 appear to represent the same person because: Clearly the same person with the same birth, death, and similar wife to be merged, also. There are differences to be worked out with the wife, but there is no reason to hold back on the Thomas Howe merge.
posted by Walter Howe

H  >  Howe  >  Thomas Howe