Contents |
Thomas Hunt, son of Richarde Hunt, was baptised 18 Apr 1613 at Pilton, Northamptonshire, England.[1] Richard Hunte was married at Pilton, Northamptonshire, to Dorothy Swales on 08 March 1606.[2] Richard Hunte apparently died a poor man,[citation needed] and thus, it is not surprising that his son Thomas would become an indentured servant.
But it seems even more likely that he was Thomas Hunt (son of Tho Hunt) baptised 14 Feb 1612/3 at Titchmarsh, Northamptonshire.[3] Titchmarsh is even closer to Keyston than Pilton is. There’s a burial 8 Jun 1619 at Titchmarsh for Thomas Hunt;[4] it could be either father or son. If it was immigrant Thomas Hunt’s father, it could explain why he became an indentured servant. Thomas Hunt who was buried in June 1619 is most likely the father, because the youngest child of this family was baptised in February 1618/19. Like Pilton, Titchmarsh is close to Keyston, Thrapston, Sudborough, and Islip (mentioned in John G. Hunt).[5]
Thomas is a common name in this Hunt family, but it appears Thomas the immigrant doesn’t have any children or grandchildren named Richard or Dorothy. This too makes it more likely that the immigrant was Thomas Hunt (Jr.) of Titchmarsh.
The existence of these two records doesn’t mean that immigrant Thomas Hunt’s father was either Thomas Hunt of Titchmarsh or Richarde Hunt of Pilton. However, it is very interesting to note that Edward Jones of Titchmarsh appears in an 1639 apprenticeship record at Boston. There are no similar records of anyone coming to New England from Pilton.
Note: Northamptonshire is the neighbouring county of Huntingdonshire.
Thomas Hunt, the “Immigrant,” was born about 1613-1615, in the vicinity of Keyston, Huntingdonshire (now Cambridgeshire), England.[6][7][8] Other birth place possibilities are the neighbouring towns of Thrapston, Sudborough, and Islip, all in Northamptonshire, England.[5] However, Titchmarsh, Northamptonshire, seems the most likely birth place (as discussed above).
Thomas Hunt immigrated in 1639 from England to the New Haven Colony as an indentured servant to William Leete of Keyston.[7] William Leete lived at Keyston, Huntingdonshire after his marriage to Ann Pain in 1636.[9] Leete and company sailed from London, England about 20 May 1639 and arrived at Quinnipiack, Connecticut between the 6th and 10th Jul 1639. They settled at New Haven, about 16 miles away.[10] (Thomas Hunt’s name does not appear in ships’ passenger lists, or Anderson’s The Great Migration Directory, 2015.)[11] Thomas was admitted to New Haven "on sufferance," probably because he is a strong supporter of the Church of England.[5][7][8] William Leete went on to serve as Governor of the Colony of New Haven from 1661 to 1665 and Governor of the Colony of Connecticut from 1676 to 1683.[12]
Thomas Hunt married Cicely Clarke about 1639 at New Haven, Connecticut.[5][8][13] One otherwise well-sourced narrative mentions, without giving an "authority", a different maiden name for Cicely: "Pasley".[14] Thomas Hunt’s wife, Sisely, signs a deed 9 Apr 1691.[15]
Sycillie Clark arrived in Boston on the ship Planter in 1635, at age 16, with the Tuttle family, with whom she moved to New Haven Colony in 1639. Since the Tuttles came from Ringstead, Northamptonshire, it seems that Sycillie was from there as well, and may have been a servant to the family.[16]
Following is a timeline for Thomas and Cicely Hunt:[5][7][8]
1 Mar 1643 - Goodman Hunt and his wife were banished from the New Haven Colony because of their friendship with William Harding, a local sawyer who had been banished by an earlier court for his lewdness.[5][17]
Mr. Harding himself was convicted of
Soon after 1 Mar 1643 - Thomas and Cicely Hunt were in Stamford, Connecticut.
1658 - The family moved to Newtown, now Elmhurst, in the New York City borough of Queens.
1660-61 - The family still in Newtown, and Thomas found in records of Stamford in 1660.
1661-62 - The family returned to Westchester in Connecticut (which later became part of the borough of the Bronx, New York City), where Thomas and his son Josiah were among the founders of St. Peter's Church.[7] That same year, Thomas was made a “freeman” of Westchester by the Connecticut general court (Westchester at that time was claimed by Connecticut).[18]
1663 - On 8 Oct 1663, at General Assembly in Hartford, the court accepted "the town of West Chester as a member of this Corporation," appointed "Mr. Edward Gishop [Jessup] a Commissioner for the Towne of West Chester" and made free "Tho: Hunt, John Quinby, Rob: Huested, Nicholas Bayley, Rich: Ponton, Samˡˡ Mills, Mr. Rich: Mills" — all of Westchester (Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut, Vol 1, p. 409ff)
1664 - Thomas Hunt was one of 24 deputies representing various Connecticut towns at the General Assembly in Hartford of 13 Oct 1664. But nothing suggests he was representing Rye. On the contrary, the "Court orders that Lnt [John] Bud continue in his place of Comr for Hasting and Rye." Thomas Hunt was, of course, representing Westchester as above (Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut, Vol 1, p. 431ff)
1665 - Thomas Hunt was in court, vs. Pomoquecee Indians in an action of taking a canoe.
1670 - Thomas in court again, when he accused "in the behalf of the town" a woman, Harryson, of being a witch, which was eventually ordered off.
Thomas Hunt purchased fifty morgen of land, known as Throckmorton's Neck from Augustine Hermans, who had bought it from the original owner, John Throckmorton. Under Hunt’s ownership, it becomes known as Grove Farm. This property, approximately 106 acres, is patented to him by Governor Richard Nicholls of New York, 4 Dec 1667.[7]
Thomas Hunt’s home at Grove Farm. |
Thomas Hunt did not purchase his Westchester farm in 1652. This would have been early for the area and early for Thomas, who was not recorded in Westchester until the 1663 freemanship cited above. Instead, Thomas Hunt bought the land no earlier than 1661, and probably between March 1661 and March 1662, as a natural part of the move from Newtown.
The mistatement again owes to Bolton, but this time only indirectly. According to Bolton, in October 1652, Augustine Hermans bought the land patented by John Throckmorton and "soon after his purchase, conveyed fifty morgen [actually just 35 morgen] of land situated on Throckmorton's Neck, to Thomas Hunt" (ibid, p. 266). Bolton chose the phrase "soon after" because he didn't know the precise date of the transaction, not because it happened the next day.
On 30 Oct 1666, at court in New York, Augustine Hermans, on behalf of Thomas Hunt, challenged John Archer’s “Claime to Certaine Parcel of Land, wch this plt: hath sold to Thomas hunt, Lying uppon Trockmortons Neck.” In his testimony, Hermans stated that he signed a sales agreement for the land with Archer "in the yeare 1658." However, Archer failed to keep his side of the bargain, so “in the yeare 1661,” Hermans “made a Collatteral agreemt with this deft: by wch the sd Covenant for the sd Land was made void, provided this plt should pay to this deft 36 gildrs Wampum (wch several times was Tendered to him).” Archer himself confirmed Herman’s account. The cancellation or attempted cancellation cleared the way for the subsequent sale to Thomas Hunt which, therefore, occurred no earlier than 1661 (The Records of New Amsterdam, ed. Fernow, Vol 6, pp. 42-3).
We also know the sale occurred before 21 Mar 1662, for on 21 Mar 1667/8, Gov. Nicolls cited a complaint by Thomas Hunt that a new fence would "debarre him from a watering place for his Cattle in the Summer tyme which he hath made use of for the space of six yeares past and upwards" (Books of General Entries of the Colony of New York 1664-1673, p. 156).
In 1668, Thomas Hunt Jr. purchased his father-in-law, Edward Jessup’s, share of the West Farms Patent from Edward’s widow, Elizabeth.[14][15]
There are lots of Land Assessment records for Thomas (between 1686 and 1696) here: https://www.familysearch.org/search/record/results?q.deathLikeDate.from=1694&q.deathLikeDate.to=1696&q.deathLikePlace=New%20York&q.givenName=Thomas&q.surname=Hunt
On 18 Aug 1688 Thomas Sr. deeded 100 acres of land to his son Thomas.[19][20] That land has since become known as Hunt's Point, now part of The Bronx in New York City.[14]
Thomas and Cecily had at least one daughter and four sons:[7][8][15]
Thomas Hunt died 8 Feb 1694-5.[5][8][15] He is buried in the family burial ground at Hunt's Point, The Bronx, New York.[21]
Hunt family burial ground. |
Thomas Hunt Jr. came in possession of half the lands in West Farms by marriage to Elizabeth, daughter of Edward Jessup.[15] This property is held by his descendants for one hundred and sixty years. On the extremity of Hunt's Point is the ancient burial ground of the family. It is made famous by being the last resting place of poet Joseph Rodman Drake.[21]
Thomas made his will on 6 Oct 1694 at Grove Farm, Throgs Neck, Westchester County, New York. In this will, proved on 27 Feb 1694-5 at New York City,[21][22] are mentioned four sons: Thomas (the eldest), Joseph, John, and Josiah; a daughter, Abigail Pinckney; a granddaughter Abigail, the child of Thomas; and three chlldren of Josiah: grandson Josiah, to whom he bequeaths the Grove Farm; and granddaughters Abigail and Martha.[15][21]
Thomas Hunt left his Grove Farm to his grandson Josiah who left it to his son Jacob who died without heirs and title passed to Jacob's brother Caleb and then to Caleb's son Gilbert, who died without children leaving a Will which authorized his mother, brothers, and unmarried sisters to live on the farm for 12 years after which it was to be sold and the proceeds divided. The property was sold by Gilbert's brother Marmaduke in 1760, and then purchased in 1775 by John Ferris who was married to Marianne (usually seen as Miana or Myana) Hunt.
As noted in the comments section, Y-DNA results are now available and show that this Hunt family is part of Haplogroup I-M253. Source: Group 027, line 14: https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Huntsurname/default.aspx?section=yresults
Suggestions of connections to a Thomas Hunt, prominent in Shrewsbury, Shropshire[23] are not evidenced by any persuasive sources.
Some sources show Cicely's maiden name as Pasely, but research has produced no evidence of a Cicely Pasely or any other name variations. It has been noted that Thomas came to this country as an indentured servant, and Cicely may also have been a servant. Both people Thomas and Cicely were associated with lived in New Haven by 1639. Circumstantial evidence makes the Hunt Clark marriage a likely scenario. It is a known fact that Thomas married a woman named Cicely.
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Thomas is 18 degrees from Emeril Lagasse, 19 degrees from Nigella Lawson, 22 degrees from Maggie Beer, 41 degrees from Mary Hunnings, 27 degrees from Joop Braakhekke, 23 degrees from Michael Chow, 18 degrees from Ree Drummond, 22 degrees from Paul Hollywood, 16 degrees from Matty Matheson, 17 degrees from Martha Stewart, 30 degrees from Danny Trejo and 22 degrees from Molly Yeh on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
First, he was never of Rye. No record establishes his residence there; none even suggest it. Writing in 1848, Robert Bolton, historian of Westchester, casually dubbed our subject "Thomas Hunt of Rye" (History of Westchester County, Vol 2, p. 536). In 1871, Charles Baird, historian of Rye, challenged, "I find nothing to bear out the statement... The name does not appear among the names of our early settlers" (History of Rye, p. 438). Yet the claim recurs. The profile timeline makes three mentions of Rye:
1. "1652 - Thomas first appeared on record at Rye, New York."
In 1652, no colonist was recorded in the area later called Rye. As Baird puts it, "The Hunt Genealogy represents this ancestor of the West chester family as going from Stamford to Rye 'by 1652' – a period when Rye certainly was not."
2. "1663 - Thomas Hunt listed as a 'freeman' at Rye."
On 8 Oct 1663, at General Assembly in Hartford, the court accepted "the town of West Chester as a member of this Corporation," appointed "Mr. Edward Gishop [Jessup] a Commissioner for the Towne of West Chester" and made free "Tho: Hunt, John Quinby, Rob: Huested, Nicholas Bayley, Rich: Ponton, Samˡˡ Mills, Mr. Rich: Mills" — all of Westchester (Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut, Vol 1, p. 409ff)
3. "1664 - Thomas Hunt elected representative of Rye"
Thomas Hunt was one of 24 deputies representing various Connecticut towns at the General Assembly in Hartford of 13 Oct 1664. But nothing suggests he was representing Rye. On the contrary, the "Court orders that Lnt [John] Bud continue in his place of Comr for Hasting and Rye." Thomas Hunt was, of course, representing Westchester as above (Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut, Vol 1, p. 431ff)
Second, Thomas Hunt did not purchase his Westchester farm in 1652. This would have been early for the area and early for Thomas, who was not recorded in Westchester until the 1663 freemanship cited above. Instead, Thomas Hunt bought the land no earlier than 1661, and probably between March 1661 and March 1662, as a natural part of the move from Newtown.
The mistatement again owes to Bolton, but this time only indirectly. According to Bolton, in October 1652, Augustine Hermans bought the land patented by John Throckmorton and "soon after his purchase, conveyed fifty morgen [actually just 35 morgen] of land situated on Throckmorton's Neck, to Thomas Hunt" (ibid, p. 266). Bolton chose the phrase "soon after" because he didn't know the precise date of the transaction, not because it happened the next day.
On 30 Oct 1666, at court in New York, Augustine Hermans, on behalf of Thomas Hunt, challenged John Archer’s “Claime to Certaine Parcel of Land, wch this plt: hath sold to Thomas hunt, Lying uppon Trockmortons Neck.” In his testimony, Hermans stated that he signed a sales agreement for the land with Archer "in the yeare 1658." However, Archer failed to keep his side of the bargain, so “in the yeare 1661,” Hermans “made a Collatteral agreemt with this deft: by wch the sd Covenant for the sd Land was made void, provided this plt should pay to this deft 36 gildrs Wampum (wch several times was Tendered to him).” Archer himself confirmed Herman’s account. The cancellation or attempted cancellation cleared the way for the subsequent sale to Thomas Hunt which, therefore, occurred no earlier than 1661 (The Records of New Amsterdam, ed. Fernow, Vol 6, pp. 42-3).
We also know the sale occurred before 21 Mar 1662, for on 21 Mar 1667/8, Gov. Nicolls cited a complaint by Thomas Hunt that a new fence would "debarre him from a watering place for his Cattle in the Summer tyme which he hath made use of for the space of six yeares past and upwards" (Books of General Entries of the Colony of New York 1664-1673, p. 156).
In sum, we can track Thomas Hunt straightforwardly, as these things go, from England to Quinnipiac to Stamford to Middelburg/Newtowne to Westchester. He did not bounce back and forth between Stamford and Rye nor between Westchester and Rye. He did not buy land in Westchester then tarry in Stamford and Newtowne for a decade before moving there.
edited by Alton Fyncher
Also, there is a record of a daughter Sarah Hunt, born Bet. 1635 - 1640 Stratford, Fairfield Co., Connecticut; died Aft. 1681 in Westchester Co., New York; who married John Ferguson Abt. 1650 in Stratford, Fairfield Co., Connecticut. See my profile pages.
edited by Ellen Gustafson
I am now even more convinced of a Titchmarsh connection for our Hunts. Dorothy Tuttle (of the Tuttles connected with Cicely Clarke-Hunt) was married to James Bill (of Ringstead), whose father Robert Bill was born at Titchmarsh. This clearly shows a connection between Ringstead and Titchmarsh. Thomas Hunt very likely knew Cicely Clarke before they left England.
The elder "Thomas Hunte of Tichmarsh ... Shepheard" drafted his will 28 May 1619. He was buried 8 Jun 1619 and his will was proved 19 Jun 1619 (Peterborough Consistory Court, Vol 9, p. 369 [Family History DGS 8084250]). Thomas' will named "Elizabeth Hunt my eldest daughter," "Alice Hunt my second daughter," "Anne Hunt my youngest daughter," "my foure sones Robt, Willm, Thomas, and John," "my wife Alice Hunt" (executrix) and "my Brother Willm Hunt" (supervisor).
There is no obvious marriage record for Thomas Hunt and wife Alice, but all of their children were baptized at Tichmersh and in the order implied by the will: Elizabetha bp 15 Aug 1602, Aloisia bp 6 Jan 1604/5, Robertus bp 2 Aug 1607, Williamus bp 8 Apr 1610, Thomas bp 14 Feb 1612/3, Anna bp 22 Oct 1615, Johannes bp 25 Feb 1618/9
edited by Alton Fyncher
The primary source is a photograph of the 1613 baptism for Thomas Hunt at Pilton, Northamptonshire (currently listed as Source 4). The only place I could find it was behind a pay wall: Northamptonshire, England, Church of England Baptisms, Marriages and Burials, 1532-1812 for Thomas Hunt Pilton Parish Registers 1569-1812: https://www.ancestry.com/interactive/9198/268P-1-1569-1812_00035/9491508
I have created a profile for Richard Hunt of Pilton and attached him as the "uncertain" father of Thomas Hunt. Information about Richard Hunt and Dorothy Swales can thus be added to that profile. By the way, they were married at Pilton on 08 March 1606.
Thomas Hunt (baptized 1613, Pilton, Northamptonshire) is most likely the immigrant ancestor, and being from a poor family, he became an indentured servant to William Leete of Keyston (just 5 miles away). I have added this information to the biography.